Skip to main content
Log in

The voter as juror: Attributing responsibility for economic conditions

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One assumption of Key's “reward-punishment” theory that has attracted comparatively little attention is that voters hold the incumbent party responsible for all manner of economic fluctuations. A brief review of the survey literature in economic voting indicates that this assumption is in need of revision. The handful of existing studies in political science on responsibility attribution suffers from a lack of conceptual clarity and a failure to develop a theory of the attribution process. This paper outlines a model of economic voting in which people act as intuitive jurors using various decision rules to evaluate the evidence surrounding the president's responsibility for national economic problems. The generalizability of the framework and directions for future research are discussed

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brickman, P., et al. (1982). “Models of Helping and Coping.”Amegican Pyychologist 37(4):368–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, R., and P. Sniderman (1977). “From Life Space to Polling Place.”British Journal of Political Science 7:337–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, P. J., and S. Feldman (1983). “Emotional Reactions to the Economy: I'm Mad as Hell and I'm Not Going to Take It Anymore.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

  • Converse, P. E. (1975). “Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In F. Greenstein and N. Polsby (eds.),Handbook of Political Science (Volume 4). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 75–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, T. E. (1980).The State of the Presidency (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiClerico, R. E. (1983).The American Presidency (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1975).An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elig, T. W., and I. H. Frieze (1979). “Measuring Causal Attribution for Success and Failure.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(4):621–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. (1982). “Economic Self-interest and Political Behavior.”American Journal of Political Behavior 26(3):446–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R., Jr. (1978).Home Style. Boston: Little-Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, F. D., and J. M. Jaspars (1980). “Attribution of Responsibility: From Man the Scientist to Man as Lawyer.” In L. Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. (1978). “Economic Retrospective Voting in American National Elections: A Micro-analysis.”American Journal of Political Science 22(2):426–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. (1981).Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen (1975).Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I., and B. Weiner (1971). “Cue Utilization and Attribution Judgment for Success and Failure.”Journal of Personality 39:591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, V. L. (1978). “Who Is Responsible? Toward a Social Psychology of Responsibility Attribution.”Social Psychology 41(4):316–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. L. (1980). “Intuitive Psychologist or Intuitive Lawyer? Alternative Model of the Attribution Process.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(5):767–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1968).Punishment and Responsibility. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A., and A. M. Honore (1959).Causation in the Law. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A., and A. M. Honore (1961). “Causation in the Law.” In H. Morris (ed.),Freedom and Responsibility. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J. R., and J. R. Alford (1981). “The Electoral Impact of Economic Conditions: Who Is Held Responsible?”American Journal of Political Science 25(3):423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. C., and S. Kernell (1981).Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (1982).Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O., Jr. (1966).The Responsible Electroate. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D. R. (1981). “Policy-oriented Voting in Response to Economic Issues.”American Political Science Review 75(2):448–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D. (1983).Macroeconomics and Micropolitics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, R. (1981). “Presidents, Popularity, and Public Opinion.Public Opinion Quarterly 45(1):1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, R., and D. R. Kiewiet (1979). “Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgements in Congressional Voting.”American Journal of Political Science 23(3):495–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, R., and D. R. Kiewiet (1981). “Sociotropic Politics: The American Case.”British Journal of American Politics 11:129–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, R., et al. (1980). “Presidential Prototypes.”Political Behavior 2(4):315–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G. D. (1971). “Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.”American Political Science Review 65(1):131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, H., and M. West (1981). “Economic Expectations in United States House and Senate Elections.”American Political Science Review 75(2):436–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. (1983).The Psychology of Control. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R., and D. Sears (1981). “Cognitive Links between Economic Grievances and Political Responses.”Political Behavior 3(4):279–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1983). “Economics and the French Voter: A Microanalysis.”Public Opinion Quarterly 47:347–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P. (1980). “Causal Attribution for Success and Failure: A Multivariate Investigation of Dimensionality, Formation, and Consequences.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(5):719–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., and E. Borgida (1975). “Attribution and the Psychology of Prediction.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32:932–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R., and L. Ross (1980).Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgments. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norpoth, H., and T. Yantek (1983). “Macroeconomic Conditions and Fluctuations of Presidential Popularity: The Question of Lagged Effects.”American Journal of Political Science 27(4):785–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. I. (1978).Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretz, P. (1981). “Why Is Inflation Seen as a Problem?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

  • Schlozman, K., and S. Verba (1979).Insult to Injury. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. J., A. H. Hastorof, and P. C. Ellsworth (1979).Person Perception (2nd ed.). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., and R. Shiffrin (1977). “Controlled and Automatic Information Processing.”Psychological Review 84:1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacks, J. (1981). “America's Fretful Mood.”Time, December 28, 1981, pp. 22–23.

  • Stigler, G. J. (1973). “General Economic Conditions and National Elections.”American Economic Review 63:160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., and J. Crocker (1980). “Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing.” In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, and M. P. Zanne (eds.),Social Cognitions: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., and S. Fiske (1978). “Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena.” In L. Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 11. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (1982). “Personalization in Attributing Responsibility for National Problems to the President.”Political Behavior 4(4):379–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T., and V. Devintz (1981). “Self-Serving Bias in Attribution of Responsibility: Cognitive Versus Motivational Explanation.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 17:408–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherford, S. M. (1983). “Economic Voting and the ‘Symbolic Politics’ Argument: A Reinterpretation and Synthesis.”American Political Science Review 77(1):158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., et al. (1972). “Perceiving the Causes of Success and Failure.” In E. E. Jones et al. (eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Social Behavior. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peffley, M. The voter as juror: Attributing responsibility for economic conditions. Polit Behav 6, 275–294 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989621

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989621

Keywords

Navigation