Abstract
Does the economy hold the key to the ups and downs of the popularity of American presidents? This study, which is based on quarterly data from 1961 to 1980, employs stochastic models for time series (Box-Jenkins). For inflation, though not for unemployment, the findings confirm a significant effect at a lag of one quarter. The worries of political leaders about the inflation side of macroeconomic performance appear to be justified. Nevertheless, the influence of noneconomic factors such as international events, the Vietnam War, and Watergate proves even more potent. Moreover, presidential popularity is subject to a cycle whereby each president begins his service with an unearned popularity bonus that subsequently erodes. Economic performance is not found to be responsible for this inauguration-erosion cycle, but neither are rallies, wars, or scandal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almon, Shirley (1965). “The Distributed Lag between Capital Appropriations and Expenditures.”Econometrica 33:178–196.
Box, George E. P., and Gwilym M. Jenkins (1976).Time Series Analysis: Revised Edition. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Freeman, John R. (1983). “Granger Causality and the Time Series Analysis of Political Relationships.”American Journal of Political Research 27:325–355.
Geweke, J., R. Meese, and W. Dent (1979). “Comparing Alternative Tests of Causality in Temporal Systems: Analytic Results and Experimental Evidence.” Social Systems Research Institute Workshop Paper No. 7928. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Golden, David G., and James M. Poterba (1980). “The Price of Popularity: The Political Business Cycle Reexamined.”American Journal of Political Science 24:696–714.
Granger, Clive W. J. (1969). “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods.”Econometrica 37:424–438.
Granger, Clive W. J., and Paul Newbold (1974). “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.”Journal of Econometrics 2:111–120.
Hibbs, Douglas A., Jr., with R. Douglas Rivers and Nicholas Vasilatos (1982). “On the Demand for Economic Outcomes: Macroeconomic Performance and Mass Political Support in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany.”Journal of Politics 43:426–462.
Kelley, Stanley, Jr. (1983).Interpreting Elections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kenski, Henry (1980). “Economic Perception and Presidential Popularity.”The Journal of Politics 42:68–75.
Kernell, Samuel (1978). “Explaining Presidential Popularity.”The American Political Science Review 72:506–522.
Kernell, Samuel (1980). “Strategy and Ideology: The Politics of Unemployment and Inflation in Modern Capitalist Democracies.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Douglas Rivers (1984). “A Retrospective on Retrospective Voting.”Political Behavior, to appear.
Kirchgassner, Gebhard (1983). “Welche Art der Beziehung herrscht zwischen der objektiven wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung..? “In Max Kaase and Hans-Dieter Kingemann (eds.),Wahlen und Politisches System. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 222–256.
Koyck, L. M. (1954).Distributed Lags and Investment Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Kramer, Gerald H. (1971). “Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896–1964.”The American Political Science Review 5:131–143.
Kramer, Gerald H. (1983). The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate- versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections and Sociotropic Voting.”American Political Science Review 77:92–111.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (1980). “Economic Conditions and Executive Popularity: The French Experience.”American Journal of Political Science 24:306–323.
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1982). “No Room for The Ins: Elections around the World.”Public Opinion 5:41–43.
McCleary, Richard, and Richard A. Hay, Jr. (1980).Applied Time Series Analysis. London: Sage.
McDowall, David, Richard McCleary, Errol E. Meidinger, and Richard A. Hay, Jr. (1980).Interrupted Time Series Analysis. London: Sage.
Monroe, Kristen R. (1978). “Economic Influences on Presidential Popularity.”Public Opinion Quarterly 42:360–369.
Mueller, John E. (1970). “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.”American Political Science Review 64:18–34.
Mueller, John E. (1973).War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.
Nelson, Charles R., and G. Schwert (1982). “Tests for Predictive Relationships between Time Series Variables: A Monte Carlo Investigation.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 77:11–17.
Norpoth, Helmut, and Thom Yantek (1983). “Macroeconomic Conditions and Fluctuations of Presidential Popularity: The Question of Lagged Effects.”American Journal of Political Science 27:785–807. (a)
Norpoth, Helmut, and Thom Yantek (1983). “Von Adenauer bis Schmidt: Wirtschaftslage und Kanslerpopularitat.” In Max Kaase and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (eds.),Wahlen und Politisches System. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 198–221. (b)
Pierce, David A. (1977). “Relationships—and the Lack Thereof—between Economic Time Series, with Special Reference to Money and Interest Rates.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 72:11–26.
Pindyck, Robert S., and Donald L. Rubinfeld (1976).Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rivers, Douglas (1980). “Distributed-lag Models in Political Research.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Ill.
Schneider, Friedrich (1984). “Public Attitudes Toward Economic Conditions and Their Impact on Government Behavior.”Political Behavior 6:211–217 (this issue).
Smith, Hedrick (1984). “Times/CBS Poll Shows President in Strong Position as Glenn Fades.”The New York Times, 25 January 1984, p. 1.
Stimson, James A. (1976). “Public Support for American Presidents: A Cyclical Model.”Public Opinion Quarterly 40:1–21.
Whiteley, Paul (1984). “Economic Performance and Government Popularity in Britain.”Political Behavior, to appear.
Yantek, Thom (1982). “Public Support for Presidential Performance: A Study of Macroeconomic Effects.”Polity 15:268–278.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norpoth, H. Economics, politics, and the cycle of presidential popularity. Polit Behav 6, 253–273 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989620
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989620