Skip to main content
Log in

Exploratory notes on criminality and emotional ambivalence

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most social and behavioral science theories, depictions of ordinary criminals tend to ignore the emotional states of offenders and the possible relationship between emotionality and criminal behavior. Theorists who do consider emotions tend to presume that crime is motivated by subconscious desires to remove guilt by being punished. This paper challenges this presumption using evidence from life-history data on criminal careers. We argue that the failure to consider the emotions of offenders leads to simplistic explanations of criminal behavior. Ordinary property offenders actually experience a great deal of emotional ambivalence concerning crime. By ambivalence we mean that despite appearent social and emotional satisfactions gained from crime, most offenders experience guilt or an enduring sense of shame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsen, David 1944 Crime and the Human Mind. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1960 The Psychology of Crime. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aichhorn, August 1963 Wayward Youth. New York, Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Franz and Hugh Staub 1956 The Criminal, the Judge, and the Public. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Franz and William Healy 1935 Roots of Crime. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell, Robert C. 1945 “A critical review of the development of the personal document method in sociology 1920–1940.” In Louis Gottschalk, C. Kluckhon, and Robert C. Angell (eds.), The Use of Personal Documents in History, Anthropology, and Sociology. Bulletin 53, New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard 1960 “Notes on the concept of commitment.” American Journal of Sociology 64: 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Claude 1965 Manchild and the Promised Land. New York: Signet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, Marshall B. and Richard Quinney 1973 Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloward, Richard and Lloyd Ohlin 1960 Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Albert K. 1955 Delinquent Boys: The Subculture of the Gang. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman 1970 The Research Act. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 On Understanding Emotion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Jack D. 1970 “Deviance and respectability: The social construction of moral meanings.” Pp. 3–30 in Jack D. Douglas (ed.), Deviance and Respectability. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Jack D. and John M. Johnson (eds.) 1977 Existential Sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell, Joseph 1965 Emotion in the Thought of Jean-Paul Sartre. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Charles E. 1973 Alternative Theories of Deviance. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Southern Illinois University.

  • 1976 Theoretical Approaches to Deviance. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 “The use of life-histories in testing theories of criminal behavior.” Qualitative Sociology 1: 122–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund 1948 The Ego and the Id. In the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19. London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1961 Beyond the Pleasure Principle. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, Erich 1941 Escape From Freedom. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Don C. 1968 Changing the Lawbreaker: The Treatment of Delinquents and Criminals. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Daniel 1964 “Criminality theories and behavioral images.” American Journal of Sociology 61: 441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving 1979 Gender Advertisements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidigger, Martin 1982 The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, Travis 1969 The Cause of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie 1983 The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, C. and W. Kelly 1945 “The concept of culture.” In Ralph Linton (ed.), The Science of Man in World Crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, Theodore D. 1981 “Social construction and positive approaches to the sociology of emotions.” American Journal of Sociology. 87: 33C.

  • Lemert, Edwin H. 1951 Social Pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, David 1964 Delinquency and Drift. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisenhelder, Thomas 1975 The Nonprofessional Property Offender. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida.

  • 1982 “Hope: A phenomenological prelude to critical social theory.” Human Studies 5: 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert 1938 “Social structure and anomie.” American Sociological Review 3: 672–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1968 Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Walter 1958 “Lower class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency.” Journal of Social Issues 14: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettler, Gwynn 1978 Explaining Crime. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piers, Gerhart and Milton Singer 1971 “Shame.” Pp. 154–74 in H. Morris (ed.), Guilt and Shame. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runyan, Wm. McKinley 1982 “In defense of the case study method.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 53(July): 440–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Marvin and Stanford Lyman 1968 “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33: 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Clifford and Henry McKay 1931 The Jack-Roller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shott, Susan 1979 “The sociology of emotions.” In S. McNall (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology. New York: St. Martins. 540–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shover, Neal 1983 “The later stages of ordinary property offender careers.” Social Problems 31(December): 208–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werthman, Carl 1967 “The function of social definitions in the development of delinquency careers.” Task Force Report: Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime. U.S. Government Printing Office, Pp. 170.

  • Wolfgang, Marvin and F. Ferracuti 1967 The Subculture of Violence. London: Travistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yochelson, Samuel and Stanton E. Samenow 1976 The Criminal Personality. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual conference of Society for Life History Research in Psychopathology at Radcliffe College, Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 31–June 2, 1983. We are grateful to Donna Bishop, Pamela Richards, and three anonymous reviewers forQualitative Sociology for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frazier, C.E., Meisenhelder, T. Exploratory notes on criminality and emotional ambivalence. Qual Sociol 8, 266–284 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989487

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989487

Keywords

Navigation