Abstract
Prior work on U.S. presidential elections has concluded consistently that voter evaluations of national economic conditions have had a greater impact on electoral outcomes than have perceptions of personal economic situations. Utilizing data from the 1984 National Election Study, we find confirmatory evidence for such a pattern. A more disaggreated examination of voters and their economic perceptions for that year, however, reveals some important refinements of earlier findings. Specifically, there is a sizable minority for whom personal economic conditions appear to matter more. Further, the role of noneconomic issue voting in distinguishing economic groups, a topic which has been largely ignored up to this point, is found to be quite pronounced — overriding, in several instances, the influence even of partisan and economic predispositions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Abramson, P., Aldrich, J., and Rohde, D. (1985).Change and Continuity in the 1984 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Bloom, H., and Price, H. (1975). Voter response to short-run economic conditions: the asymmetric effect of prosperity and recession.The American Political Science Review 69: 1240–1254.
Brody, R., and Page, B. (1972). Comment: the assessment of policy voting.The American Political Science Review 66: 450–458.
Conover, P., and Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy.American Journal of Political Science 30:50–78.
Downs, A. (1957).An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Feldman, S. (1982). Economic self-interest and political behavior.American Journal of Political Science 26: 446–466.
Feldman, S. (1984). Economic self-interest and the vote.Political Behavior 6: 229–251.
Keeter, S. (1985). Public opinion in 1984. In G. Pomper (ed.),The Election of 1984. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, pp. 91–111.
Key, V. (1949).Southern Politics. New York: Vintage.
Kinder, D., and Kiewiet, D. (1979). Economic discontent and political behavior: the role of personal grievances and collective economic judgments in congressional voting.American Journal of Political Science 23: 295–527.
Kinder, D., and Kiewiet, D. (1981). Sociotropic politics.British Journal of Political Science 11: 129–161.
Kinder, D., and Mebane, W. (1983). Politics and economics in everyday life. In K. Monroe (ed.),The Political Process and Economic Change, pp. 141–180. New York: Agathon Press.
Longman, P. (1982). Taking America to the cleaners.The Washington Monthly (November).
Quirk, P. (1985). The economy: economists, electoral politics, and Reagan economics. In M. Nelson (ed.),The Elections of 1984, pp. 155–188. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Schattschneider, E. (1975).The Semisovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
Weatherford, M. (1983). Economic voting and the “symbolic politics” argument: a reinterpretation and synthesis.The American Political Science Review 77: 158–174.
Wright, G., and Berkman, M. (1986). Candidates and policy in United States Senate elections.American Political Science Review 80: 567–590.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gopoian, J.D., Yantek, T. Cross-pressured economic voting in America: The 1984 election. Polit Behav 10, 37–51 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989379
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989379
Keywords
- Economic Condition
- Economic Situation
- Presidential Election
- Electoral Outcome
- National Election