Skip to main content
Log in

Different levels of morphometric variation in three heterogamous dogrose species (Rosa sect.Caninae, Rosaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Difficulties in delimiting well-defined entities in the dogroses (Rosa sect.Caninae) has resulted in very variable taxonomic treatments. The present study was undertaken to provide a background for taxonomy as well as plant breeding. Morphometric diversity was analysed on seedlings obtained from field collections in South Sweden of three species,Rosa dumalis, R. rubiginosa andR. villosa. A canonical variates analysis showed that the three species are relatively distinct whereas two subspecies ofR. dumalis were less well discriminated. Analyses of variance demonstrated that intraspecific variation is pronounced inR. dumalis and, to a lesser extent, inR. villosa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almquist, S., 1919: SverigesRosae. — Stockholm: Idun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, K., Heslop-Harrison, J. W., 1921: The status of the British rose forms as determined by their cytological behaviour. — Ann. Bot.35: 159–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst, H. T., 1948: Cytogenetic studies onRosa rubiginosa and its hybrids. — Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.52: 510–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, P., Melton, B., 1986: Self- and cross-compatibility relationships among genotypes and between ploidy levels of the rose. — J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.111: 122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerlind, F., 1940: Sind diecanina-Rosen agamospermische Bastarde? — Svensk Bot. Tidskr.34: 334–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1942: Kommt Agamospermie bei dencanina-Rosen vor? — Hereditas28: 224–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, Å., 1944: The constitution of theRosa canina complex. — Hereditas30: 405–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1942: Meiosis in someRosa-hybrids. — Bot. Not.95: 331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, C. C., 1925: Chromosomes and characters inRosa and their significance in the origin of species. — Exp. Genet.38: 534–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1931: Embryo-sac formation in diploid and polyploid species ofRosaceae. — Proc. Roy. Soc., London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci.109: 126–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jicinska, D., 1976a: Autogamy in various species of the genusRosa. — Preslia48: 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976b: Morphological features of F1 generation inRosa hybrids, 1. Hybrids of some species of the sect.Caninae withRosa rugosa. — Folia Geobot. Phytotax.11: 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroon, G. H., Zeilinga, A. E., 1974: Apomixis and heterogamy in rose rootstocks (Rosa canina L.). — Euphytica23: 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmgren, U., 1986: SläktetRosa i Sverige. — Svensk Bot. Tidskr.80: 209–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, R., 1975:Rosa L. — InStace, C. A., (Ed.): Hybridization and the flora of the British Isles, pp. 212–227. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, Ö., 1967: Drawings of Scandinavian plants 1–8.,Rosa L. — Bot. Not.120: 1–8, 137–143, 249–254, 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. J., 1990a: — SPSS© advanced statisticsTM user's guide. — Chicago: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1990b: — SPSS© base system user's guide. — Chicago: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nybom, H., Olsson, Å., Werlemark, G., 1996: Morphometric variation in Nordic dogroses (Rosa sect.Caninae, Rosaceae). — Acta Univ. Ups., Symb. Bot. Ups.31(3): 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratsek, J.-C., Flory, W. S. Jr.,Yarnell, S. H., 1941: Crossing relations of some diploid and polyploid species of roses. — J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.38: 637–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Täckholm, G., 1922: Zytologische Studien über die GattungRosa. — Acta Horti Berg.7: 97–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uggla, M., 1992: Development of rose hip cultivars and growing techniques for establishment of plantations. — In: Balsgård-Department of Horticultural Plant Breeding, Biennial Report 1990–1991, pp. 65–68. — Krístíanstad: SLU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weising, K., Nybom, H., Wolff, K., Meyer, W., 1994: DNA fingerprinting in plants and fungi. — Boca Raton: CRC Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werlemark, G., Carlson-Nilsson, U., Uggla, M., Nybom, H., 1995: Effects of temperature treatments on seedling emergence in dogroses,Rosa Sect.Caninae L. — Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. B, Soil Pl. Sci.45: 278–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielinski, J., 1985: Studia and radzajemRosa L. — Systematyka sekcjiCaninae DC. em.Christ. — Arbor. Körnickie30: 3–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nybom, H., Carlson-Nilsson, U., Werlemark, G. et al. Different levels of morphometric variation in three heterogamous dogrose species (Rosa sect.Caninae, Rosaceae). Pl Syst Evol 204, 207–224 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989206

Key words

Navigation