Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 374–383 | Cite as

Partnership in rice research: Rationale, experience, and implications

  • Denning G. L. 
  • Bernardo F. A. 
Article

Abstract

Individuals and institutions cooperate with expectations of improved effectiveness and efficiency. In this paper, partnership in rice research is examined. We begin by identifying the underlying rationale for partnership vis-a-vis independent initiatives: that the benefits of working together exceed the corresponding costs. We argue that benefits are derived principally from shared interests and differences, while the major costs of partnership emerge from the need to negotiate roles and responsibilities and to exchange information. We then focus on IRRI's experience — its partners and the various collaborative mechanisms employed. Historically the national agricultural research systems have been IRRI's principal research partners. Of late the number and diversity of partners have grown, bringing significant challenges to IRRI's management approach and structure. Increased cooperation with rice farming communities, consumers, non-government organizations, advanced research institutions, and the private sector is anticipated. The emergence of research consortia as a partnership mechanism introduces the problem of “indirect management”, in which there is a separation of responsibility and accountability — both for IRRI and its partners. Several techniques to address this problem are suggested.

Keywords

Private Sector Exchange Information Management Approach Advanced Research Rice Farming 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Denning, G. L.: Intensifying Rice-based Cropping Systems in the Rainfed Lowlands of Iloilo, Philippines: Results and Implications. pp. 109–142. In: Tripp, R. (ed.), Planned Change in Farming Systems: Progress in On-Farm Research. John Wiley, Chichester 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Denning, G. L.: Farmers as Customers: A Service Management Approach to Designing an Agricultural Research and Development Institution. IRRI Discussion Paper Series No. 3. International Rice Research Institute, PO Box 933, 1099 Manila, Philippines 1994.Google Scholar
  3. IRRI: Annual Report for 1961–1962. International Rice Research Institute, PO Box 933, 1099 Manila, Philippines 1962.Google Scholar
  4. IRRI: International Rice Research Institute: 25 Years of Partnership. International Rice Research Institute, PO Box 933, 1099 Manila, Philippines 1985.Google Scholar
  5. IRRI: IRRI Toward 2000 and Beyond. International Rice Research Institute, PO Box 933, 1099 Manila, Philippines 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Lax, D. A.; Sebenius, J. K.: The Manager as Negotiator. The Free Press, New York 1986.Google Scholar
  7. PhilRice: Backgrounder on PhilRice. Information Bulletin Series No. 2 (1992). Philippine Rice Research Institute, Maligaya, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines 1992a.Google Scholar
  8. PhilRice: PhilRice Annual Report 1991. Philippine Rice Research Institute, Maligaya, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija, Philippines 1992b.Google Scholar
  9. Zandstra, H. G.; Price, E. C.; Litsinger, J. A.; Morris, R. A.: A Methodology for On-Farm Cropping Systems Research. International Rice Research Institute, PO Box 933, 1099 Manila, Philippines 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denning G. L. 
    • 1
  • Bernardo F. A. 
    • 2
  1. 1.International Programs Management OfficePhilippines
  2. 2.International ServicesInternational Rice Research InstituteManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations