Abstract
This paper analyzes how decentralized social movements manifest themselves on the local level, by studying twenty-five social movement organizations within the battered women's movement. Data consist of in-depth interviews with group members, the study focuses on six issues faced by the groups: how they recognized the need in their communities for alternative services for battered women; how they enlisted community support; how they defined themselves in terms of feminism and the participation of men, how they developed a working relationship with the battered women whom they wanted to help; how they structured their organizations; and how they established goals and strategies. Since the groups were at different stages of development, a dynamic analysis is made of each issue. Groups dealt with the issues on the basis of local resources, values, and other conditions. The movement's structure allowed this independence, which strengthened each group's ability to mobilize resources and accomplish goals. However, it also resulted in local decisions that were often inconsistent with movement goals and weakened the ability of movement leaders to control strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahrens, Lois (1980). “Battered women's refuges: Feminist co-operatives vs. social service institutions.”Radical America 14:41–47.
Ash, Roberta (1972).Social Movements in America. Chicago: Markham.
Ferraro, Kathleen J. (1981). “Processing battered women.”Journal of Family Issues 2:415–438.
Ferraro, Kathleen J. (1983). “Negotiating trouble in a battered women's shelter.”Urban Life 12:287–306.
Freeman, Jo (1983). “A model for analyzing the strategic options of social movement organizations.” Pp. 193–210 in Jo Freeman (ed.),Social Movements of the Sixties and Seventies. New York: Longman.
Gerlach, Luther P. and Virginia H. Hine (1970). People, Power, and Change. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Johnson, John M. 1981 “Program enterprise and official cooptation in the battered women's shelter movement.” American Behavioral Scientist24:827–842.
Loseke, Donileen R. and Spencer E. Cahill 1984 “The social construction of deviance: Experts on battered women.” Social Problems31:296–310.
McGrath, Colleen 1979 “The crisis of domestic order.” Socialist Review9:11–30.
Martin, Del 1976Battered Wives. San Francisco: Glide Publications.
Marx, Gary T. and Michael Useem 1971 “Majority involvement in minority movements: Civil rights, abolition, untouchability.” Journal of Social Issues27:81–104.
Morgan, Patricia 1981 “From battered wife to program client: The state's shaping of social problems.” Kapitalistate9:17–39.
Nall, Elizabeth 1977 Social Movement to Social Organization: A Case Study of a Women's Center. Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 12, 8009-A.
Reinharz, Shulamit 1984 “Alternative settings and social change.” Pp. 287–336 in Kenneth Heller, Richard Price, Shulamit Reinharz, Stephanie Riger, Abraham Wandersman (eds.) Psychology and Community Change: Challenges of the Future. 2nd Edition. Homewood, Illinois: Dorsey.
Schechter, Susan 1982 Women and Male Violence: The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women's Movement. Boston: South End Press.
Simmel, Georg 1950 “The stranger.” Pp. 402–408 in Kurt H. Wolff (ed.), The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press.
Sullivan, Gail 1982 “Funny things happened on our way to revolution.” Aegis: Magazine on Ending Violence Against Women34:12–32.
Thorne, Barrie 1971 Resisting the Draft: An Ethnography of the Draft Resistance Movement. Doctoral Dissertation, Brandeis University. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.
Tierney, Kathleen 1979 Social Movement Organization, Resources Mobilization, and the Creation of a Social Problem: A Case Study of a Movement for Battered Women. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
1982 “The battered women movement and the creation of the wife beating problem.” Social Problems29:207–220.
Walker, Lenore E. 1979 The Battered Woman. New York: Harper Colophon.
Wharton, Carol S.-- “Troubled relations within battered women's shelters: Daily patterns and conflicts.” Urban Life (in press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is grateful to Barrie Thorne, Kathleen Ferraro, the editors and two anonymous reviewers of QUALITATIVE SOCIOLOGY for their extensive reviews of earlier drafts of this paper. Support for writing the paper was provided by a summer fellowship from the Faculty Research Committee of the University of Richmond.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wharton, C.S. Establishing shelters for battered women: Local manifestations of a social movement. Qual Sociol 10, 146–163 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988526
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988526