Abstract
Accuracy of respondent recall has long been a concern in political science research. Earlier analyses of voter behavior discovered errors which included 10 to 25 percent of the sample. The present work examines an important attitudinal question which appears in each national election study: the time at which the respondent recalls making a final presidential vote choice. Data from the four-wave 1980 National Election Panel Study are used to validate the recall variable for that election campaign. A new variable — candidate preference patterns — is created which reflects consistency in individual voter preference. Only forty percent of the sample reflect consistent responses on the two measures. Furthermore, partisan strength and political involvement are found to be positively related to inconsistent behavior. Cognitive dissonance and the bandwagon effect are offered as explanations for these results.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Abramson, Paul R., and Claggett, William (1984). Race-related difference in self-reported and validated turnout.Journal of Politics 46:719–738.
Asher, Herbert B. (1974). Some consequence of measurement error in survey data.American Journal of Political Science 18:469–485.
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul, and McPhee, John (1954).Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bradburn, Norman H., Sudman, Seymour, and Associates (1979).Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Calahan, Don (1968). Correlates of respondent accuracy in the Denver Validity Study.Public Opinion Quarterly 32:607–621.
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren E. (1954).The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Clausen, Aage R. (1968). Response validity in surveys.Public Opinion Quarterly 32:588–606.
Gray, Percy G. (1955). The memory factor in social surveys.American Statistical Association Journal 50:344–363.
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Hurley, Patricia A. (1984). Nonvoters in voters' clothing: The impact of voting behavior misreporting on voting behavior research.Social Science Quarterly 64:199–206.
Himmelweit, Hilde T., Biberian, Marianne Jaeger, and Stockdale, Janet (1978). Memory for past vote: Implications of a study of bias in recall.British Journal of Political Science 8:365–384.
Katosh, John P., and Traugott, Michael W. (1980). The Consequences of validated and self-reported voting measures in studies of electoral participation. Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
King, James D., et al. (1981). The problem of respondent recall: A note on the consequences of using inaccurate survey data.Political Methodology 7:1–11.
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel (1944).The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Miller, W. E., Miller, A. H., and Schneider, E. J. (1980).American National Election Studies Data Sourcebook 1952–1978. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Niemi, Richard G., Katz, Richard S., and Newman, David (1980). Reconstructing past partisanship: The failure of the party identification recall questions.American Journal of Political Science 24:633–651.
Parry, Hugh J., and Crossley, Helen M. (1950). Validity of responses to survey questions.Public Opinion Quarterly 14:61–80.
Pierce, John C., and Lovrich, Nicholas P. (1982). Survey measurement of political participation: Selective effects of recall in petition signing.Social Science Quarterly 63:164–171.
Reynolds, H. T. (1977).Analysis of Nominal Data. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
Sigelman, Lee (1982). The nonvoting voter in voting research.American Journal of Political Science 26:47–56.
Traugott, Michael W., and Katosh, John P. (1979). Response validity in surveys of voting behavior.Public Opinion Quarterly 43:359–377.
Volgy, Thomas J., and Schwarz, John E. (1984). Misreporting and vicarious political participation at the local level.Public Opinion Quarterly 48:757–765.
Weir, Blair T. (1975). The distortion of voter recall.American Journal of Political Science 19:53–62.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plumb, E. Validation of voter recall: Time of electoral decision making. Polit Behav 8, 302–312 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988434
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988434
Keywords
- Cognitive Dissonance
- National Election
- Election Campaign
- Vote Choice
- Political Involvement