Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 10, Issue 11, pp 1623–1634 | Cite as

Behavioral responses of elm bark beetles to baited and unbaited elms killed by cacodylic acid

  • D. P. O'Callaghan
  • P. M. Atkins
  • C. P. Fairhurst
Article

Abstract

Diseased elms, treated with various doses of cacodylic acid in northwest England, became attractive to elm bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). This attraction seemed to be independent of pheromone baits. However attractive the trees became, they were unsuitable to the beetles as breeding sites since significantly more beetles visited the trees than were stimulated to penetrate and attempt to breed. It seems as if colonization of trap trees by the bark saprophytePhomopsis oblonga following cacodylic acid treatment made the trees unsuitable to beetles for breeding.

Key words

Cacodylic acid pheromone Phomopsis oblonga Dutch Elm disease elm bark beetles Scolytus scolytus Scolytus multistrialus Coleoptera Scolytidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blight, M.M., Mellon, F.A., Wadhams, L.J., andWenham, M.J. 1977. Volatiles associated withScolytus scolytus beetles on English Elm.Experienlia 33:845–847.Google Scholar
  2. Blight, M.M.,King, C.J.,Wadhams, L.J., andWenham, M.J. 1980. Studies on chemically mediated behaviour in the large elm bark beetle,Scolytus scolytus (F). (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Field Trials 1979.Forestry Commission R&D Paper 129. 34 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Doskotch, R.W., Chatterji, S.K., andPeacock, J.W. 1970. Elm bark derived feeding stimulants for the smaller European elm bark beetle.Science 167:380–382.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, K. 1981. Studies on the effects of cacodylic acid, Ceratotect and Lignasan on the growth ofCeratocystis ulmi andPhomopsis oblonga in vitro. B.Sc. thesis.University of Salford. Google Scholar
  5. Elkinton, J.S.,andWood, D.L. 1980. Feeding and boring behaviour ofIps Paraconfusus on the bark of host and nonhost tree species.Can. Entomol. 112:797–809.Google Scholar
  6. Elkinton, J.S., Wood, D.L., andBrowne, L.E. 1981. Feeding and boring behavior of the bark beetle,Ipsparaconfusus, in extracts of ponderosa pine phloem.J. Chem. Ecol. 7:209–220.Google Scholar
  7. Fairhurst, C.P., andKing, C.J. 1983. The effect of climatic factors on the dispersal of elm bark beetles, pp. 40–46, D. A. Burdekin (ed.).in Research on Dutch Elm Disease in Europe. Forestry Commission Bulletin. H.M.S.O., London, p. 60.Google Scholar
  8. Gore, W.E., Pearce, G.T., Lanier, G.N., Simeone, J.B., Silverstein, R.M., Peacock, J.W., andCuthbert, R.A. 1977. Aggregation attractant of the European elm bark beetle,Scolytus Multistriatus. Production of individual components and related aggregation behavior.J. Chem. Ecol. 3:429–446.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, J.N.,Burdekin, D.A., andBrasier, C.M. 1977. Dutch elm disease, Forestry Commission, Forest Record 115, H.M.S.O. 12 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, B.L., Baker, J.E., andMorris, D.M. 1967. Juglone (5-Hydroxy-1, 4-napthoquinone) fromCarya ovata, a deterrent to feeding byScolytus multistriatus.J. Insect Physiol. 13:1453–1459.Google Scholar
  11. Jobling, J., andMitchell, A. 1974. Field recognition of British elms. Forestry Commission Booklet 42. H.M.S.O., London. 25 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Lanier, G.N. 1981. Pheromone baited traps and trap trees in the integrated management of bark beetles in urban areas, pp. 115–131,in E.R. Mitchell (ed.). Management of Insects Pests with Semiochemicals. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Lanier, G.N. 1982. Dutch elm disease: A postscript.Arnoldia 42:78–87.Google Scholar
  14. Norris, D.M. 1977. Role of repellents and detterents in feedingof Scolytus multistriatus, pp. 115–230,in P.A. Hedin (ed.). Host Plant Resistence to Pests. Am. Chem. Symp. Ser. No. 63.Google Scholar
  15. O'callaghan, D.P. 1982. Low-level utilization of breeding material by elm bark beetles in northwest England. Forestry Commission Report on Forest Research 1982, H.M.S.O. London, pp. 58–60.Google Scholar
  16. O'callaghan, D.P., andFairhurst, C.P. 1983. Evaluation of the trap-tree technique for control of Dutch elm disease in northwest England, pp. 23–28,in D.A. Burdekin (ed.). Research on Dutch Elm disease in Europe. Forestry Commission Bulletin, H.M.S.O., London, p. 60.Google Scholar
  17. O'callaghan, D.P., Gallagher, E.M., andLanier, G.N. 1980. Field evaluation of phero mone-baited trap-trees to control elm bark beetles vectors of Dutch elm disease.Environ. Entomol. 8:181–185.Google Scholar
  18. Peacock, J.W., Lincoln, A.C., Simeone, J.B., andSilverstein, R.M. 1971. Attraction ofScolytus multistriatus to virgin-female produced pheromone in the field.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64:1143–1149.Google Scholar
  19. Pearce, G.T., Gore, W.E., Silverstein, R.M., Peacock, J.W., Cuthbest, R.A., Lanier, G.N., andSimeone, J.B. 1975. Chemical attractants for the smaller European elm bark beetle,Scolytus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)J. Chem. Ecol. 1:115–124.Google Scholar
  20. Švihra, P., andKoehler, C.S.. 1981. Attraction of flyingScolytus multistriatus to cut wood of three elm species in California.Environ. Entomoi. 10:565–566.Google Scholar
  21. Webber, J.F. 1981. A natural biological control for Dutch elm disease.Nature 292:449–451.Google Scholar
  22. Wood, D.L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones and allomones in the host selection behavior of bark beetles.Annu. Rev. Entomoi. 27:441–446.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. P. O'Callaghan
    • 1
  • P. M. Atkins
    • 1
  • C. P. Fairhurst
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of SalfordSalfordEngland

Personalised recommendations