Political Behavior

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 305–322 | Cite as

Generations, status and party identification: A theory of operant conditioning

  • Keith R. Billingsley
  • Clyde Tucker


Five political generations in the U.S. national electorate are identified utilizing the theory of operant conditioning. The party identification of 11,312 white registered voters from the 1980New York Times/CBS News poll series is examined for these generations within social status (education) groupings.


Social Status Operant Conditioning National Electorate Party Identification Political Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramson, Paul (1971). Social class and political change in Western Europe: A cross-national longitudinal analysis.Comparative Political Studies 4:131–155.Google Scholar
  2. Abramson, Paul (1972). Generational change in Britain and Italy: A cohort analysis of social class and partisan choice. Paper presented at the International Studies Association, Hotel Adolphus, Dallas, March 14–18.Google Scholar
  3. Abramson, Paul (1975).Generational Change in American Politics. Lexington Mass.: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  4. Abramson, Paul (1976). Generational change and the decline of party identification in America: 1952–1974.American Political Science Review 70 (June):469–478.Google Scholar
  5. Abramson, Paul (1978). Class voting in the 1976 presidential election.Journal of Politics 40 (Spring):1066–1072.Google Scholar
  6. Abramson, Paul (1979a). Developing party identification: A further examination of life-cycle, generational and period effects.American Journal of Political Science 23 (February):78–96.Google Scholar
  7. Abramson, Paul (1979b). Comment: On the relationship between age and party identification.Political Methodology 6 (Fall):447–485.Google Scholar
  8. Alford, Robert (1963).Class and Society. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  9. Andersen, Kristi (1979).The Creation of a Democratic Majority, 1928–1936. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bandura, Albert (1977).Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, Paul (1974). A socialization theory of partisan realignments. In Richard Niemi and associates (eds.),The Politics of Future Citizens. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Beck, Paul (1979). The electoral cycle and patterns of American politics.The British Journal of Political Science 9 (April):129–156.Google Scholar
  13. Beck, Paul (1984). Young vs. old in 1984: Generations and life stages in presidential nomination politics.PS 17 (Summer):515–524.Google Scholar
  14. Berelson, Bernard R., et al. (1954).Voting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Books, John W., and Reynolds, JoAnn B. (1975). Note on class voting in Great Britain and the United States.Comparative Political Studies 8 (October):360–376.Google Scholar
  16. Butler, David E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1969).Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  17. Campbell, Angus, et al. (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Claggett, William (1981). Partisan acquisition versus partisan intensity: Life cycle, generation and period effects, 1952–1976.American Journal of Political Science 25 (May):193–214.Google Scholar
  19. Claggett, William (1972). Generational effects, the political environment and parental and non-parental agents of partisan acquisition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Milwaukee, April 28–May 1.Google Scholar
  20. Converse, Philip E. (1956). The shifting role of class in political attitudes and behavior. In Elanor Maccoby et al.,Readings in Social Psychology (3rd ed.), pp. 388–399. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  21. Converse, Philip E. (1969). Of time and partisan stability.Comparative Political Studies 2 (July): 139–171.Google Scholar
  22. Converse, Philip E. (1972). Change in the American electorate. In Angus Campbell and Philip Converse (eds.),The Human Meaning of Social Change. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Converse, Philip E. (1976).The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort-Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Converse, Philip E. (1979). Rejoinder to Abramson.American Journal of Political Science 23 (February):97–100.Google Scholar
  25. Crittenden, J. (1962). Aging and party affiliation.Public Opinion Quarterly 26 (Winter): 648–657.Google Scholar
  26. Cutler, Neal E. (1969). Generation, maturation and party affiliations: A cohort analysis.Public Opinion Quarterly 33 (Winter):494–519.Google Scholar
  27. Cutler, Neal E. (1970). Generational succession as a course of foreign policy attitudes: A cohort analysis of American opinion, 1946–1966.Journal of Peace Research 7:33–47.Google Scholar
  28. Glenn, Norval (1973). Sources of the shifts to political independence: Some evidence from a cohort analysis.Social Science Quarterly 53 (December):494–515.Google Scholar
  29. Glenn, Norval, and Hefner, Ted (1972). Further evidence on aging and party identification.Public Opinion Quarterly 36 (Spring):31–47.Google Scholar
  30. Inglehart, Ronald (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies.The American Political Science Review 65 (December):991–1017.Google Scholar
  31. Jennings, M. Kent, and Neimi, Richard (1974).The Political Character of Adolescence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Knoke, David (1976).Change and Continuity in American Politics: The Social Bases of Political Parties. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ladd, Everett Carll, and Hadley, C. D. (1973). Party definition and party differentiation.Public Opinion Quarterly 37: 21–34.Google Scholar
  34. Mannheim, Karl (1952). The problem of generations. In Paul Kegskemiti (ed.),Essays on the sociology of Knowledge (2nd ed.), pp. 276–322. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  35. Pomper, Gerald M. (1975).Voter's Choice: Varieties of American Electoral Behavior. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
  36. Shively, W. Phillips (1977). Information costs and the partisan life cycle. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September.Google Scholar
  37. Shively, W. Phillips (1979a). The development of party identification among adults: Exploration of a functional model.American Political Science Review 73 (December):1039–1054.Google Scholar
  38. Shively, W. Phillips (1979b). The relationship between age and party identification: A cohort analysis.Political Methodology 6 (Fall): 437–446.Google Scholar
  39. Shively, W. Phillips (1979c). Reply to Abramson.Political Methodology 6 (Fall):457–461.Google Scholar
  40. Skinner, B. F. (1953).Science and Human Behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Trilling, Richard J. (1976).Party Image and Electoral Behavior. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith R. Billingsley
    • 1
  • Clyde Tucker
  1. 1.Advanced Computational Methods CenterUniversity of GeorgiaAthens

Personalised recommendations