Skip to main content
Log in

Factors influencing male sexual response in the American cockroachPeriplaneta americana

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male sexual response inPeriplaneta americana is influenced by the presence or absence of sex pheromone, the length of time since last exposure to pheromone, the length of that exposure, and the photocycle. Females begin emission of sex pheromone 9 or more days after the molt to adult. The quantity emitted does not appear to be influenced by the photocycle. During the light phase of the photocycle, males only respond to high concentrations of pheromone. They recover quickly after brief exposures, but after prolonged exposures, a second exposure 24 h later elicited responses of lower intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, W.J., Burns, R.E., andEarth, R.H. 1974. Quantitative aspects of the male courting response in the cockroachByrsotria fumigata (Guérin) (Blattaria).Behav. Biol. 10:419–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, E.F., andBell, W.J. 1974. Ethometric analysis of pheromone receptor function in cockroaches.J. Insect Physiol. 20:993–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butz, A., andAronoff, A. 1970. Adult male response to the sex attractant of the virgin female American cockroach.Abstr. Natl. Meeting Entomol. Soc. Am., Miami Beach, Fla. p. 51.

  • Lipton, G.R., andSutherland, D.J. 1970. Activity rhythms in the American cockroach,Periplaneta americana.J. Insect Physiol. 16:1555–1566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persoons, C.J., Ritter, F.J., andLichtendonk, W.J. 1974. Sex pheromones of the American cockroach,Periplaneta americana. Isolation and partial identification of two excitants.Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam, Series C. 77:201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L.M., andWillis, E.R. 1952. A study of cockroach behavior.Am. Midl. Nat. 47:66–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, M.K. 1976. Quantitative analysis of male responses released by female sex pheromonein Periplaneta americana.Anim. Behav. 24:681–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, M.K., andBell, W.J. 1976. Chemo-anemotaxis: a behavioral response to sex pheromone in nonflying insects.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73 2524–2526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, M.K., Burk, T., andBell, W.J. 1976. Pheromone-stimulated locomotory and orientation responses in the American cockroach.Anim. Behav. 24:52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, M.L., andWharton, D.R.A. 1957. The production of sex attractant substance and of oöthecae by the normal and irradiated American cockroach,Periplaneta americana L.J. Insect Physiol. 1:229–239.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawkins, W.A., Rust, M.K. Factors influencing male sexual response in the American cockroachPeriplaneta americana . J Chem Ecol 3, 85–99 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988136

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988136

Key words

Navigation