Abstract
Flowering and pollination biology of the monoecious palmEuterpe precatoria was studied in the forest of the “Reserva Ducke” near Manaus, Brazil, during two annual flowering periods (middle of October to end of March) between 1991 and 1993. Individuals produced one to four bisexual inflorescences per flowering period. Inflorescences have staminate and pistillate flowers in triads. The anthesis of the whole inflorescence averaged 26 days, with the male phase extending over the first 17 days, followed by six days without any open flowers, and the female phase covering the last three days. The distinct dichogamy of the inflorescence results in obligate outcrossing. The pollen-ovule ratio is high (42000). Both male and female flowers emit an almond oil-like scent and produce nectar in septal nectaries. The concentration and total amount of sugar of the nectar of female flowers (37% and 0.021 mg) were significantly higher than that of male flowers (9% and 0.007 mg). The nectar is hexose-rich and with a moderately high amino acid concentration (68 µg/ml).Euterpe precatoria seems to be a generally entomophilous palm with a predominance of beetles and bees as potential pollinators. The most constant visitors were beetles of the familiesCurculionidae, Chrysomelidae, Staphylinidae, and bees of the familyHalictidae. The actual composition of the insect spectrum depends on climatic and biotic factors. Additionally, wind pollination may occur. Fruit development lasted four months and ripe fruits are swallowed by toucans who thus disperse the seeds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, A. B., Overal, W. L., Henderson, A., 1988: Pollination ecology of a forest-dominant palm (Orbignya phalerata Mart.) in Northern Brazil. — Biotropica20: 192–205.
Baker, H. G., Baker, I., 1983a: Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. — InJones, C. E., Little, R. J., (Eds): Handbook of experimental pollination biology, pp. 117–141. — New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
—, 1983b: A brief historical review of the chemistry of floral nectar. — InBentley, B., Elias, T., (Eds): The biology of nectaries, pp. 126–152. — New York: Columbia University Press.
Balick, M. J., 1985: The indigenous palm flora of Las Gaviotas, Colombia, including observations on local names and uses. — Bot. Mus. Leafl.30: 1–34.
Bannister, B. A., 1970: Ecological life cycle ofEuterpe globosa Gaertn. — InOdum, H. T., Pigeon, R. F., (Eds): A tropical rain forest. A study of irradiation and ecology at El Verde, Puerto Rico, pp. B299-B314. — Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA: U.S. Atomic Energy Comission.
Bernal, R., Ervik, F., 1996: Floral biology and pollination of the dioecious palmPhytelephas seemannii in Colombia: an adaptation to staphylinid beetles. — Biotropica (in press).
Bovi, L. A., Silva Dias, G. da, 1986a: Biologia floral do palmiteiro (Euterpe edulis Mart.). — In: Congresso Nacional da SBPC, Ouro Preto, Resumos, p. 33.
— 1986b: Sistema reprodutivo do palmiteiro (Euterpe edulis Mart.). — In: Congresso Nacional da SBPC, Ouro Preto, Resumos, p. 34.
Bullock, S. H., 1981: Notes on the phenology of inflorescences and pollination of some forest palms in Costa Rica. — Principes25: 101–105.
Burquez, A., Sarukhan, K., Pedroza, A. L., 1987: Floral biology of a primary rain forest palm,Astrocaryum mexicanum Liebm. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.94: 407–419.
Cohen, S. A., Michaud, D. P., 1993: Synthesis of a fluorescent derivatizing reagent, 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxisuccinimidyl carbamate, and its application for the analysis of hydrolysate amino acids via high-performance liquid chromatography. — Analytical Biochem.211: 279–287.
Daumann, E., 1970: Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung. — Feddes Repert.80: 463–590.
Ervik, F., 1993: Notes on the phenology and pollination of the dioecious palmsMauritia flexuosa (Calamoideae) andAphandra natalia (Phytelephantoideae) in Ecuador. — InBarthlott, W., Naumann, C. M., Schmidt-Loske, K., Schuchmann, K.-L., (Eds): Animal-plant interactions in tropical environments, pp. 7–12. — Bonn: Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig.
—, 1996: Flower biology and insect visitation of the monoecious palmPrestoea decurrens on the Pacific Coast of Colombia. — Principes40: 89–92.
—Feil, J. P., 1996: Reproductive biology of the monoecious understory palmPrestoea schultzeana in Amazonian Ecuador. — Biotropica (in press).
Esau, K., 1977: Anatomy of seed plants. 2nd edn. — New York: Wiley.
Fahn, A., 1982: Plant anatomy. 3rd edn. — New York: Pergamon Press.
Frankie, G. W., Haber, W. A., 1983: Why bees move between mass-flowering neotropical trees. — InJones, C. E., Little, R. J., (Eds): Handbook of experimental pollination biology, pp. 360–372. — New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Gerlach, D., 1984: Botanische Mikrotechnik. 3rd edn. — Stuttgart: Thieme.
Glassman, S. F., 1972: A revision ofB. E. Dahlgren's index of American palms. — Phanerogamarum Monographiae, 6, 294 pp. — Lehre: Cramer.
Gottsberger, G., Arnold, T., Linskens, H. F., 1989: Intraspecific variation in the amino acid content of floral nectar. — Bot. Acta102: 141–144.
—, 1990: Variation in floral nectar amino acids with aging of flowers, pollen contamination, and flower damage. — Israel. J. Bot.39: 167–176.
—, 1973: Die Zucker-Bestandteile des Nektars einiger tropischer Blüten. — Portugaliae Acta Biol., Sér.A 13: 1–8.
—, 1984: Amino acids and sugars in nectar, and their putative evolutionary significance. — Pl. Syst. Evol.145: 55–77.
Heel, W. A. Van, 1988: On the development of some gynoecia with septal nectaries. — Blumea33: 477–504.
Henderson, A., 1985: Pollination ofSocratea exorrhiza andIriartea ventricosa. — Principes29: 64–71.
—, 1986: A review of pollination studies in thePalmae. — Bot. Rev.52: 221–259.
—, 1995: Field guide to the palms of the Americas. — Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kahn, F., 1988: Ecology of economically important palms in the Peruvian Amazonia. — Advances Econ. Bot.6: 42–49.
Kornerup, A., Wanscher, J. H., 1981: Taschenlexikon der Farben. 3rd edn. — Zürich, Göttingen: Musterschmidt.
Küchmeister, H., Gottsberger, G., Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I., 1993: Pollination biology ofOrbignya spectabilis, a “monoecious” Amazonian palm. — InBarthlott, W., Naumann, C. M., Schmidt-Loske, K., Schuchmann, K.-L., (Eds): Animal-plant interactions in tropical environments, pp. 67–76. — Bonn: Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig.
Listabarth, C., 1992: A survey of pollination strategies in theBactridinae (Palmae). — Bull. Inst. Franc. Études Andines21: 1–16.
—, 1993: Pollination inGeonoma macrostachys and three congeners,G. acaulis, G. gracilis, andG. interrupta. — Bot. Acta106: 496–506.
—, 1994: Pollination and pollinator breeding inDesmoncus. — Principes38: 13–23.
Marques Filho, A. de O., Ribeiro, M. de N. G., Santos, H. M. dos, Santos, J. M. dos, 1981: Estudos climatológicos da Reserva Florestal Ducke — Manaus-AM. IV. Precipitação. — Acta Amazonica11: 759–768.
O'Brien, T. P., McCully, M. E., 1981: The study of plant structure. Principles and selected methods. — Melbourne: Termacarph.
Percival, M. S., 1961: Types of nectar in angiosperms. — New Phytol.60: 235–281.
Pinheiro, C. U. B., Balick, M., 1987: Brazilian palms. — Contr. New York Bot. Gard.17.
Roubik, D. W., 1989: Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. — New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scariot, A. O., Lleras, E., Hay, J. D., 1991: Reproductive biology of the palmAcrocomia aculeata in Central-Brazil. — Biotropica23: 12–22.
Schmid, R., 1983: Septal nectaries ofAsterogyne martiana and otherPalmae. — Principes27: 168–174.
—, 1985: Functional interpretations of morphology and anatomy of septal nectaries. — Acta Bot. Neerl.34: 125–128.
Schultes, R. E., 1974: Palms and religion. — Principes18: 3–21.
Silberbauer—Gottsberger, I., 1973: Blüten- und Fruchtbiologie vonButia leiospatha (Arecaceae). — Österr. Bot. Z.121: 171–185.
—, 1990: Pollination and evolution in palms. — Phyton (Austria)30: 213–233.
Smets, E. F., Cresens, E. M., 1988: Types of floral nectaries and the concepts “character” and “character-state” — a reconsideration. — Acta Bot. Neerl.37: 121–128.
Uhl, N. W., Moore, Jr., H. E., 1971: The palm gynoecium. — Amer. J. Bot.58: 945–992.
—, 1973: The protection of pollen and ovules in palms. — Principes17: 111–149.
Urpi, J. M., Solis, E. M., 1980: Polinización enBactris gasipaes H. B. K. (Palmae). — Rev. Biol. Trop.28: 153–174.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study is part of an unpublished doctoral thesis of the first author. The paper is dedicated to emer. Univ.-Prof. DrFriedrich Ehrendorfer at the occasion of his 70th birthday
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Küchmeister, H., Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I. & Gottsberger, G. Flowering, pollination, nectar standing crop, and nectaries ofEuterpe precatoria (Arecaceae), an Amazonian rain forest palm. Pl Syst Evol 206, 71–97 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987942
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987942