Skip to main content
Log in

Revision ofDoniophyton (Compositae, Barnadesioideae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This revision describes, illustrates and documents morphological variation inDoniophyton (Compositae, Barnadesioideae), restricted to Argentina and Chile. Two species are recognized,D. anomalum andD. weddellii (sp. nova), possessing distinct morphological and chromosomal features, elevational tolerances, and nearly allopatric distributions.Doniophyton weddellii occurs primarily in central to northern Andean Chile and Argentina from 1900–4000 m a. s. l.;D. anomalum is found principally in centralwestern Argentina and south into Patagonia at 0–1800 m a. s. l. Close relationship exists withChuquiraga of subfam.Barnadesioideae. It is hypothesized thatDoniophyton evolved out ofChuquiraga in the high central Andes between Chile and Argentina. It is suggested thatD. weddellii differentiated first, correlating with an aneuploid chromosomal decrease from n = 27 (inChuquiraga) to n = 25. Further evolution and chromosomal decrease to n = 24 resulted inD. anomalum, with accompanying migration into southern Andes and Patagonia. Nomenclatural changes result from examination of protologues and type specimens:Doniophyton anomalum replaces the commonly used nameD. patagonicum, and a new species,D. weddellii, is described for the taxon masquerading under the routinely used superfluous nameD. andicola.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bohm, B. A., Stuessy, T. F., 1995: Flavonoid chemistry ofBarnadesioideae (Asteraceae). — Syst. Bot.20: 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1996: Flavonoid chemistry ofCalyceraceae. — Canad. J. Bot.73: 1962–1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., 1994:Asteraceae: cladistics and classification. — Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: A new subfamily of theAsteraceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 414–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. L., 1939: Las compuestas del Parque Nacional del Nahuel Huapí. — Revista Mus. La Plata, Secc. Bot.2: 227–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1959: Revisión del géneroDasyphyllum (Compositae). — Revista Mus. La Plata, Secc. Bot.9: 21–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1962:Compositae. — InCorrea, M. N., (Ed.): Flora Patagónica,7, pp. 1–451. — Buenos Aires: INTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977:Mutisieae — systematic review. — InHeywood, V. H., Harborne, J. B., Turner, B. L., (Eds): The biology and chemistry of theCompositae, pp. 1039–1066. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolle, A. P. de, 1838:Chuquiraga. — In: Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis,7, pp. 9–10. — Paris.

  • Chung, I.-C., 1965: Revision ofBarnadesia (Compositae—Mutisieae). — Chicago: Published by the author.

  • Crawford, R. M. M., 1989: Studies in plant survival. — Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVore, M. L., Stuessy, T. F., 1995: The place and time of origin of theAsteraceae, with additional comments on theCalyceraceae andGoodeniaceae. — InHind, D. J. N., Jeffrey, C., Pope, G. V., (Eds): Advances inCompositae systematics, pp. 23–40. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Don, D., 1832: Descriptive catalogue of theCompositae contained in the herbarium of Dr.Gillies; with some additions from other sources. — Phil. Mag. Ann. Chem.11: 387–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezcurra, C., 1985: Revisión del géneroChuquiraga (Compositae-Mutisieae). — Darwiniana26: 219–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greuter, W., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Chaloner, W. G., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D. L., Jørgensen, P. M., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Trehane, P., McNeill, J., (Eds), 1994: International code of botanical nomenclature. — Königstein: Koeltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. V., Seberg, O., 1984: Paralectotype, a new type term in botany. — Taxon33: 707–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hieronymus, G., 1885: Icones et descriptiones plantarum. — Breslau.

  • —, 1886:Flotovia divaricata. — In: Descripción ilustrada de las plantas que crecen espontáneamente en la Republica Argentina. — Actas Acad. Nac. Ci. Córdoba2: 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, P. K., Holmgren, N. H., Barnett, L. C., (Eds), 1990: Index herbariorum. Part I: the herbaria of the world. 8th edn. — Regnum Veg.120.

  • Hooker, W. J., 1835: Contributions towards a flora of South America and the islands of the Pacific. — Companion. Bot. Mag.1: 29–38, 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, R. K., Palmer, J. D., 1987: A chloroplast DNA inversion marks an ancient evolutionary split in the sunflower family (Asteraceae). — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA84: 5818–5822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, F., 1893: Dos viajes botánicos al Río Salado superior. — Bol. Acad. Nac. Ci. Córdoba13: 171–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, P. C., 1960: Las especies de plantas descritas porR. A. Philippi en el Siglo XIX. — Santiago: University of Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra, O., Marticorena, C., 1972: Granos de polen de plantas chilenas. II.Compositae-Mutisieae. — Gayana Bot.21: 1–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesacreta, T. C., Stuessy, T. F., 1996: Autofluorescent walls of connective bases in anthers ofBarnadesioideae (Asteraceae), and systematic implications. — Taxon45: 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippi, R. A., 1863: Catálogo de las plantas recogidas, hecho por el Dr.R. A. Phillippi [sic]. — InCox, G. E.: Viaje a las rejiones septentrionales de la Patagonia. — Anales Univ. Chile23: 448–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramayya, N., 1962: Studies on the trichomes of someCompositae I. General structure. — Bull. Bot. Surv. India4(104): 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remy, J., 1848:Chuquiraga. — InGay, C.: Hist. Chile bot. [Flora chilena],3, pp. 275–280. — Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwabe, H., 1950: Anatomía foliar deDoniophyton Weddell (Compositae). — Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot.3(2): 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearn, W. T., 1993: Botanical Latin. 4th edn. — Devon: David & Charles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1971: Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. — London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuessy, T. F., Sagástegui, A. A., 1993: Revisión deArnaldoa (Compositae, Barnadesioideae), género endémico del norte del Peru. — Arnaldoa1(4): 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1996: Phylogeny and biogeography of the subfamilyBarnadesioideae with implications for early evolution of theCompositae. — InHind, D. J. N., Jeffrey, C., Pope, G. V., (Eds): Proceedings of the InternationalCompositae Conference. Kew, 1994,1, systematics, pp. 463–490. — Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weddell, H. A., 1855: Chloris Andina.1, part 1. — Paris: Bertrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulff, A. F., 1990: Estudios cromosómicos enBarnadesiinae (Mutisieae, Asteraceae). I.Chuquiraga y Doniophyton. — Darwiniana30: 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is dedicated with admiration and respect to emer. Univ.-Prof. DrFriedrich Ehrendorfer, one of the world's outstanding plant systematists, and a leading scientist and administrator of the Institute of Botany of the University of Vienna

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katinas, L., Stuessy, T.F. Revision ofDoniophyton (Compositae, Barnadesioideae). Pl Syst Evol 206, 33–45 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987939

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987939

Key words

Navigation