Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of attire, location, and sex on aiding behavior: A similarity explanation

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript


This study examined two distinct theoretical explanations for the effect of attire on aiding behavior. The reinforcing value of attire itself predicted that well-dressed persons would always receive more assistance than poorly dressed persons. The reinforcing value of perceived similarity predicted that similar persons would receive more assistance than dissimilar persons. Female confederates (N=17) who were well-dressed or poorly dressed approached males and females in an airport or bus station asking for a dime to complete a telephone call. Well-dressed confederates received more money at the airport; poorly dressed confederates received more money at the bus station. These results were interpreted as support for the similarity hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. Physical attractiveness. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.),Advances in expermental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickman, L. Clothes make the person.Psychology Today 1974,4 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J.K. & Saine, T.The unspoken dialogue. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaikin, A.L., Derlega, V.J., Yoder, J., & Phillips, D. The effects of appearance on compliance.Journal of Social Psychology 1974,92 199–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crassweller, P., Gordon, M.A., Tedford, W.H., Jr. An experimental investigation of hitchhiking.Journal of Psychology 1972,82 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J.M., & Cooper, J. The “clean for Gene” phenomenon: The effect of students' appearance on political campaigning.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1972,2 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R.M.Theories in social psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M.B., & Bays, G. Altruism and sex roles.Psychological Reports 1973,32 1002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R.P.Beyond words. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastorf, A.H., Schneider, D.J., & Polefka, J.Person perception. Menio Park, California: Addison-Wesley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M.L.Nonverbal communication in human interaction. (2nd ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leathers, D.G.Nonverbal communication systems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, B.J. & Unger, R.K. Effect of deviant and conventional attire on cooperation.Proceedings of the American Psychological Association 1971,6 357–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, L.B. & Plax, T.G. Clothing as communication.Journal of Communication 1977,27 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavo, R.S., Sherlock, B., & Wicklund, G. Effect of attire on obtaining directions.Psychological Reports 1974,34 245–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld, P., Bochner, S., & Matas, C. Petitioner's attire and petition signing by peace demonstrators.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1971,1 278–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld, P., Bochner, S. & Wnek, D. Helper-sufferer similarity and a specific request for help: Bystander intervention during a peace demonstration.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1972,2 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was competitively selected to be presented to the communication theory interest group at the Central States Communication Association convention in St. Louis, Missouri, April 5–7, 1979.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hensley, W.E. The effects of attire, location, and sex on aiding behavior: A similarity explanation. J Nonverbal Behav 6, 3–11 (1981).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: