Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 3–11 | Cite as

The effects of attire, location, and sex on aiding behavior: A similarity explanation

  • Wayne E. Hensley
Article

Abstract

This study examined two distinct theoretical explanations for the effect of attire on aiding behavior. The reinforcing value of attire itself predicted that well-dressed persons would always receive more assistance than poorly dressed persons. The reinforcing value of perceived similarity predicted that similar persons would receive more assistance than dissimilar persons. Female confederates (N=17) who were well-dressed or poorly dressed approached males and females in an airport or bus station asking for a dime to complete a telephone call. Well-dressed confederates received more money at the airport; poorly dressed confederates received more money at the bus station. These results were interpreted as support for the similarity hypothesis.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. Physical attractiveness. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.),Advances in expermental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  2. Bickman, L. Clothes make the person.Psychology Today 1974,4 49–51.Google Scholar
  3. Burgoon, J.K. & Saine, T.The unspoken dialogue. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Chaikin, A.L., Derlega, V.J., Yoder, J., & Phillips, D. The effects of appearance on compliance.Journal of Social Psychology 1974,92 199–200.Google Scholar
  5. Crassweller, P., Gordon, M.A., Tedford, W.H., Jr. An experimental investigation of hitchhiking.Journal of Psychology 1972,82 43–47.Google Scholar
  6. Darley, J.M., & Cooper, J. The “clean for Gene” phenomenon: The effect of students' appearance on political campaigning.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1972,2 24–33.Google Scholar
  7. Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R.M.Theories in social psychology. New York: Basic Books, 1965.Google Scholar
  8. Harris, M.B., & Bays, G. Altruism and sex roles.Psychological Reports 1973,32 1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison, R.P.Beyond words. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1974.Google Scholar
  10. Hastorf, A.H., Schneider, D.J., & Polefka, J.Person perception. Menio Park, California: Addison-Wesley, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. Knapp, M.L.Nonverbal communication in human interaction. (2nd ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. Leathers, D.G.Nonverbal communication systems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1976.Google Scholar
  13. Raymond, B.J. & Unger, R.K. Effect of deviant and conventional attire on cooperation.Proceedings of the American Psychological Association 1971,6 357–358.Google Scholar
  14. Rosenfeld, L.B. & Plax, T.G. Clothing as communication.Journal of Communication 1977,27 24–31.Google Scholar
  15. Schiavo, R.S., Sherlock, B., & Wicklund, G. Effect of attire on obtaining directions.Psychological Reports 1974,34 245–246.Google Scholar
  16. Suedfeld, P., Bochner, S., & Matas, C. Petitioner's attire and petition signing by peace demonstrators.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1971,1 278–283.Google Scholar
  17. Suedfeld, P., Bochner, S. & Wnek, D. Helper-sufferer similarity and a specific request for help: Bystander intervention during a peace demonstration.Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1972,2 17–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wayne E. Hensley
    • 1
  1. 1.the Department of Communication StudiesVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg

Personalised recommendations