Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 8, Issue 7, pp 1043–1055 | Cite as

Composition, quantification, and periodicity of sex pheromone gland volatiles from individualHeliothis virescens females

  • Mary Mistrot Pope
  • L. K. Gaston
  • T. C. Baker
Article

Abstract

Sex pheromone gland volatiles from individualHeliothis virescens (F.) females were collected and analyzed on an SP-2330 capillary gas-liquid chromatography column for identification and quantification of the compounds emitted. Only four of the seven compounds previously reported as pheromone components appeared consistently in the volatile collections: 14:Ald, Z9-14:Ald, 16:Ald, and Z11-16:Ald. The female glands did not emit the same amounts of these compounds throughout a 24-hr period; they emitted maximum quantities between 6 and 11 hr after the onset of scotophase with the remainder of the photoperiod having minimal emission rates. Although the absolute quantities fluctuated, the percent compositions of the compounds remained about the same throughout the 24-hr period.

Key words

Heliothis virescens Lepidoptera Noctuidae Z11-16:Ald 16:Ald Z9-14:Ald 14:Ald sex pheromone emission gland volatiles blend composition pheromone emission rates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, T.C., Gaston, L.K., Pope, M.M., Kuenen, L.P.S., andVetter, R.S. 1981. A high efficiency collection device for quantifying sex pheromone volatilized from female glands and synthetic sources.J. Chem. Ecol. 7:961–968.Google Scholar
  2. Coffelt, J.A., Sower, L.L., andVick, K.W. 1978. Quantitative analysis of identified compounds in pheromone gland rinses ofPlodia interpunctella andEphestia cautella at different times of day.Environ. Entomol. 7:502–505.Google Scholar
  3. Hartstack, A.W.,Jr., Lopez, J.D.,Klun, J.A.,Witz, J.A.,Shaver, T.N., andPlimmer, J.R. 1980. New trap designs and pheromone bait formulations forHeliothis. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conference, 1980. pp. 132–136.Google Scholar
  4. Klon, J.A., andMaini, S. 1979. Genetic basis of an insect chemical communication system: The European cornborer.Environ. Entomol. 8:423–426.Google Scholar
  5. Klun, J.A., Bierl-Leonhardt, B.A., Plimmer, J.R., Sparks, A.N., Primiani, M., Chapman, O.L., Lepone, G., andLee, G.H. 1980. Sex pheromone chemistry of the female tobacco budworm moth,Heliothis virescens.J. Chem. Ecol. 6:177–183.Google Scholar
  6. Miller, J.R., andRoelofs, W.L. 1980. Individual variation in sex pheromone component ratios in two populations of the redbanded leafroller moth,Argyrotaenia velutinana.Environ. Entomol. 9:359–363.Google Scholar
  7. Roelofs, W.L., Hill, A.S., Cardé, R.T., andBaker, T.C. 1974. Two sex pheromone components of the tobacco budworm moth,Heliothis virescens.Life Sci. 14:1555–1562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shorey, H.H., andHale, R.L. 1965. Mass rearing of the larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial diet.J. Econ. Entomol. 58:522–524.Google Scholar
  9. Sparks, A.N., Raulston, J.R., Lingren, P.D., Carpenter, J.E., Klun, J.A., andMullinix, B.G. 1979. Field response of maleHeliothis virescens to pheromonal stimuli and traps.Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 25:268–274.Google Scholar
  10. Tumlinson, J.H., Hendricks, D.E., Mitchell, E.R., Doolittle, R.E., andBrennen, M.M. 1975. Isolation, identification, and synthesis of the sex pheromone of the tobacco budworm.J. Chem. Ecol. 1:203–214.Google Scholar
  11. Tumlinson, J.H.,Heath, R.R., andTeal, P.E.A. 1982. Analysis of chemical communication systems of Lepidoptera.In American Chemical Society Symposium, “Chemistry and Application of Insect Pheromone Technology.” National Meeting of ACS, Aug. 27, 1981. New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Mistrot Pope
    • 1
  • L. K. Gaston
    • 1
  • T. C. Baker
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Toxicology and Physiology Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiverside

Personalised recommendations