Skip to main content
Log in

Bark beetle olfaction. III. Antennal olfactory responsiveness ofDendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman andD. brevicomis Le Conte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to aggregation pheromones and host tree terpene hydrocarbons

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electroantennograms from males and females ofDendroctonus frontalis andD. brevicomis in response to serial dilutions of the pheromonesexo brevicomin and frontalin and the host terpene hydrocarbons 3-carene and α-pinene show no significant differences in the threshold concentration for response to the compounds for either sex or species. The intensity of response was greater to higher concentrations of the pheromones (10 to >104 μg) than the terpene hydrocarbons, suggesting the presence of more receptors on the antennae for pheromones than terpene hydrocarbons. Antennal olfactory responses to the compounds did not correlate to published data on behavioral responses by the beetles to the compounds in both field and laboratory studies. Adaptation experiments indicated that forD. frontalis, both frontalin andexo brevicomin share the same receptors on the antennae. The results indicated that the terpene hydrocarbons share some, but not all, of the same receptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedard, W.D., Tilden, P.E., Wood, D.L., Silverstein, R.M., Brownlee, R.G., andRodin, J.O. 1969. Western pine beetle: Field response to its sex pheromone and a synergistic host terpene, myrcene.Science 164:1284–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedard, W.D., Silverstein, R.M., andWood, D.L. 1970. Bark beetle pheromones.Science 167:1638–1639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckh, J. 1969. Electrical activity in olfactory receptor cells, pp. 34–51,in C. Pfaffman (ed.). Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste, New York, 1968. Rockefeller University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckh, J., Kaissling, K.E., andSchneider, D. 1965. Insect olfactory receptors. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 30:263–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, L.E., andWood, D.L. Personal communication.

  • Kaissling, K.E. 1971. Insect olfaction, pp. 351–431,in L. Beidler (ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. IV. Chemical Senses 1 Olfaction. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling, K.E., andPriesner, E. 1970. Die Riechschwelle des Seidenspinners.Naturwissenschaften 57:23–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzer, G.W., Fentiman, Jun. A.F., Page, Jun. T.F., Foltz, R.L., VitÉ, J.P., andPitman, G.B. 1969. Bark beetle attractants: Identification synthesis and field bioassay of a new compound isolated fromDendroctonus.Nature 221:477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T.L. 1970. Electrophysiological investigations on response to pheromones in bark beetles.-Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24:275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T.L. 1971. Bark beetle olfaction. I. Electroantennogram responses of the southern pine beetle (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to its aggregation pheromone frontalin.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64:266–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T.L. 1974. Pheromone perception, pp. 35–61,in M. Birch (ed.),Pheromones. North Holland Publishing Company.

  • Payne, T.L., Shorey, H.H., andGaston, L.K. 1970. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths: Factors influencing antennal responsiveness in males ofTrichoplusia ni.J. Insect Physiol. 16:1043–1055.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, G.B., andVité, J.P. 1971. Predator-prey response to western pine beetle attractants.J. Econ. Entomol. 64:402–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, G.B., Vité, J.P., Kinzer, G.W., andFentiman, A.F. 1969. Specificity of population-aggregating pheromones inDendroctonous.J. Insect Physiol. 15:363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, J.A.A., andVité, J.P. 1969. Bark beetle attractants: Mechanism of colonization byDendroctonus frontalis.Nature 224:1222–1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. 1957. Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen von Chemo- und Mechano-rezeptoren der Antenne des SeidenspinnersBombyx mori.L. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 40:8–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. 1969. Insect olfaction: Deciphering system for chemical messages.Science 163:1031–1037.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, R.M., Brownlee, R.G., Bellas, T.E., Wood, D.L., andBrowne, L.E. 1968. Brevicomin: Principal sex attractant in the frass of the female western pine beetle.Science 159:889–891.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vité, J.P., andPitman, G.B. 1969. Aggregation behavior ofDendroctonus brevicomis in response to synthetic pheromones.J. Insect Physiol. 15:1617–1622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vité, J.P., andPitman, G.B. 1970. Management of western pine beetle populations: Use of chemical messengers.J. Econ. Entomol. 63:1132–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vité, J.P., andRenwick, J.A.A. 1971. Inhibition ofDendroctonus frontalis response to frontalin by isomers of brevicomin.Naturwissenschaften 58:418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D.L. 1972. Selection and colonization of ponderosa pine by bark beetles, pp. 101–117,in H.F. Vanemden. (ed.), Insect/Plant Relationships. Symp. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research was supported by McIntire-Stennis Project 1525, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Paper No. 11382.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Payne, T.L. Bark beetle olfaction. III. Antennal olfactory responsiveness ofDendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman andD. brevicomis Le Conte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to aggregation pheromones and host tree terpene hydrocarbons. J Chem Ecol 1, 233–242 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987872

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987872

Key words

Navigation