Skip to main content
Log in

Receptor discrimination of enantiomers of the aggregation pheromone ipsdienol, in two species ofIps

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stimulation effect of the two enantiomers of the male-produced aggregation pheromone, ipsdienol, was tested by electrophysiological recordings from single olfactory cells in females of two species,Ips pini andI. paraconfusus. The results demonstrated two types of receptor cells, each specialized to one of the optical configurations. This suggests that separate acceptors (membrane receptors) for (+)- and (−)-ipsdienol are produced by the beetles' receptor cells. The dose-response curves obtained for the 92% “pure” enantiomers and racemic mixtures indicated no synergistic or inhibitory interaction of the enantiomers on the receptor cells. The results could be explained by activation of one acceptor type in each cell group.

I. paraconfusus apparently had the majority of its ipsdienol cells keyed to the (+)-enantiomer. Conversely, the westernI.pini had more cells tuned to (−)- than to (+)-ipsdienol. This difference is consistent with behavioral responses where these species are sympatric in California. The (+)- and (−)-ipsdienol are aggregation pheromone components ofI. paraconfusus anaI. pint, respectively, and the opposite enantiomers act as aggregation inhibiting allomones. More (−)- than (+)-ipsdienol cells were also obtained in the easternI. pint, even though this population produces more (+)- than (−)-ipsdienol (63∶35) and requires both enantiomers for aggregation behavior. However, the difference in the numbers of (+)- and (−)-ipsdienol cells recorded from the eastern population was insufficient for an acceptable level of statistical confidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angst, M.E., andLanier, G.N. 1979. Electroantennogram responses of two populations ofIps pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to insect-produced and host tree compounds.J. Chem. Ecol 5:129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M.C., andLight, D.M. 1977. Inhibition of the attractant pheromone response inIps pini and I.paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Field evaluation of ipsenol and linalool.J. Chem. Ecol. 3:257–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M.C., andWood, D.L. 1975. Mutual inhibition of the attractant pheromone response by two species ofIps. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)J. Chem. Ecol. 1:101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M.C., Light, D.M., andMori, K. 1977. Selective inhibition of response ofIps pini to its pheromone by the (S)-(−)-enantiomer of ipsenol.Nature 270:738–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M.C., Light, D.M., Wood, D.L., Browne, L.E., Silverstein, R.M., Bergot, B.J., Ohloff, G., West, J.R., andYoung, J.C. 1980. Pheromonal attraction and allomonal interruption ofIps pini in California by the two enantiomers of ipsdienol.J. Chem. Ecol. 6:703–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckh, J., andBoeckh, V. 1979. Threshold and odour specificity of pheromone-sensitive neurons in the deutocerebrum ofAntheraea pernyi andA. polyphemus (Saturnidae).J. Comp. Physiol. 132:235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, W.A. 1970. Molekulare Wechselwirkung bei der Erregung einzelner Riechzellen.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 70:105–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling, K.E. 1974. Sensory transduction in insect olfactory receptors, pp. 243–273,in L. Jaenicke (ed.). Biochemistry of Sensory Functions. 25th Mosbacher Colloquium. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, G.N., Birch, M.C., Schmitz, R.F., andFurniss, M.M. 1972. Pheromones ofIps pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Variation in response among three populations.Can. Entomol. 104:1917–1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, G.N., Claeson, A., Stewart, T., Piston, J.J., andSilverstein, R.M. 1980. The basis for interpopulational differences in pheromone biology.J. Chem. Ecol. 6:677–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, D.M., andBirch, M.C. 1979. Inhibition of the attractive pheromone Response inIps paraconfusus by R-(−)-ipsdienol.KOM Nawi 726:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustaparta, H., Angst, M.E., andLanier, G.N. 1978. Responses of single receptor cells in the pine engraver beetle,Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its aggregation pheromone, ipsdienol and the aggregation inhibitor, ipsenol.J. Comp. Physiol. 121:343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustaparta, H., Angst, M.E., andLanier, G.N. 1979. Specialization of olfactory cells to insect- and host produced volatiles in the bark beetle speciesIps pini(Say).J. Chem. Ecol. 5:109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohloff, G., andGiersch, W. 1977. Access to optically active ipsdienol from verbenone.Helv. Chim. Acta 60:1496–1500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritschel, W.A. 1973. Angewandte Biopharmazie. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft MBH, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, R.M. 1979. Enantiomeric composition and bioactivity of chiral semiochemicals in insects, pp. 133–146,in F.J. Ritter (ed.). Chemical Ecology: Odour Communication in Animals. Elsevier, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, R.M., Rodin, J.O., andWood, D.L. 1966. Sex attractants in frass produced by maleIps confusus in ponderosa pine.Science 154:509–510.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mustaparta, H., Angst, M.E. & Lanier, G.N. Receptor discrimination of enantiomers of the aggregation pheromone ipsdienol, in two species ofIps . J Chem Ecol 6, 689–701 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987679

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987679

Key words

Navigation