Abstract
The latest revisionism in the study of political tolerance has produced some of the most provocative well-designed research in the field of political science. In particular, the work by Sullivan, Piereson, and Marcus offers one of the most fully specified and rigorously executed models of public opinion formation. Yet this contemporary revisionism is flawed. This paper argues that these researchers misconceptualize tolerance, that this misconception contaminates their measurement process, that the resulting model is misspecified, and that the political conclusions offered are not supported in fact or principle. More generally this paper argues that the field of public opinion as a whole has been trapped by limited conceptions about the nature of cognitive constraint and by simplistic and inadequate methods for measuring and identifying this constraint. To remedy this, a developmental measure of cognitive moral stages is fashioned along lines suggested by Kohlberg. This measure satisfies a number of tests for both validity and reliability and appears to be one of the most powerful predictors of tolerance and intolerance — if not the most powerful single predictor.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, G. W. (1954).The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Alwin, D. F., and Jackson, D. J. (1982). The statistical analysis of Kohn's measures of parental values. In K. G. Joreskog and H. Wold (eds.).Systems under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction, Part I. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and McPhee, William N. (1954).Voting, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bishop, George F., Tuchfarber, A. F., and Oldenick, R. (1978). Change in the structure of American political attitudes: The nagging question of question wording.American Journal of Political Science 20: 250–269.
Blasi, Augusto (1980). Bridging cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature.Psychological Bulletin 88: 1–45.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. (1964).The American Voter (Abridged ed.). New York: John Wiley.
Cantril, Hadley, and Strunk, Mildred (eds.). (1951).Public Opinion: 1935–1946. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Coby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., and Liberman, M. (1983).A Longitudinal Study of Moral Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In David Apter (ed.),Ideology and Utopia. London: Free Press.
Cutler, Stephen J., and Kaufman, Robert L. (1975). Cohort changes in political attitudes: Tolerance of ideological nonconformity.Public Opinion Quarterly 39: 69–81.
Davis, James A. (1975). Communism, conformity, cohorts, and categories: American tolerance in (1954) and 1972–73.American Journal of Sociology 81: 491–513.
Deutsch, M., and Collins, M. (1951).Interracial Housing: A Psychological Evaluation of an Social Experiment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gibbs, J. C. (1977). Kohlberg's stages of moral judgment: A constructive critique.Harvard Education Review 47: 43–61.
Gibson, James L., and Bingham, Richard D. (1982). On the conceptualization and measurement of political tolerance.American Political Science Review 76: 603–620.
Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women's conception of the self and of morality.Harvard Educational Review 47: 481–517.
Greeley, Andre M., and Sheatsley, Paul B. (1974). Attitudes toward racial integration. In L. Rainwater (ed.),Inequality and Justice. Chicago: Aldine Press.
Haan, N., Smith, M. B., Block, J. (1968). Moral reasoning of young adults: Political social behavior, family background, and personality correlates.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10: 183–201.
Hagner, P. R. and MacIver, J. P. (1980). Attitude stability and change in the 1976 election. In J. Pierce and J. Sullivan (eds.).The Electorate Reconsidered. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Harman, H. H. (1976).Modern Factor Analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jackman, Mary R. (1978). General and applied tolerance: Does education increase commitment to racial integration?American Journal of Political Science 22: 302–324.
Jackman, Robert W. (1972). Political elites, mass publics, and support for democratic principles.Journal of Politics 34: 753–773.
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1979).Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models. Latham, N.Y.: University Press of America.
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D. (1984).LISREL VI. Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala.
Knight, Kathleen (1983). Ideology in the 1980 election: Sophistication does matter. Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Ill.
Kohn, M. L. (1969).Class and Conformity. Homewood, Ill.: The Dorsey Press.
Kohn, M. L. (1976). Social class and parental values: Another confirmation of the relationship: Comment on Wright and Wright.American Sociological Review 41: 538–545.
Kohlberg, Lawrence (1968). The child as a moral philosopher.Psychology Today (September): 25–30.
Kohlberg, Lawrence (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (ed.).Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Kohlberg, Lawrence (1976). Morals stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In T. Lickona (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues, pp. 31–53. New York: Holt Rinehard and Winston.
Kohlberg, Lawrence (1980). The future of liberalism as the dominant ideology of the west. In R. W. Wilson and G. J. Schochet (eds.),Moral Development and Politics, pp. 55–68. New York: Praeger.
Kovesi, Julius (1967).Moral Notions. London: Routledge.
Kurtines, W., and Grief, E. (1974). The development of moral thought: Review and evaluation of Kohlberg's approach.Psychological Bulletin 81: 453–470.
LaPiere, R. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions.Social Forces 13: 230–237.
Lawrence, David (1976). Procedural norms and tolerance: A reassessment.American Political Science Review 70: 80–100.
Levitin, Teresa E., and Miller, Warren E. (1979). Ideological interpretations of presidential elections.American Political Science Review 73: 751–772.
Lickona, Thomas (1976). Critical issues in the study of moral development and behavior. In T. Lickona (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston.
Lipset, S. M. (1960).Political Man. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
McClosky, Herbert (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics.American Political Science Review 58 (June): 361–382.
National Opinion Research Center (NORC) (1982).General Social Surveys, 1972–1982: Cumulative Code Book. Storrs, Conn.: Roper Center.
Nunn, Clyde Z., Crockett, Harry J., and Williams, J. Allen (1978).Tolerance for Nonconformity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). Chicago: McGraw-Hill.
Piaget, J. (1932).The Moral Judgment of the Child (M. Gabain, trans.). London: Kegan Paul.
Popkin, Samuel, Gorman, John W., Phillips, Charles, and Smith, Jeffrey A. (1976). Comment: What have you done for me lately? Toward an investment theory of voting.American Political Science Review 70: 779–805.
Prothro, James W., and Grigg, Charles M. (1960). Fundamental principles of democracy.Journal of Politics 22: 276–294.
Reset, J. R. (1976). New approaches in the assessment of moral judgment. In T. Lickona (ed.),Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues, pp. 198–218. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston.
Saenger, G., and Gilbert, E. (1950). Customer reactions to the integration of Negro sales personnel.International Journal of Opinion and Attitude Research 4: 57–76.
Saltzstein, Herbert D. (1983). Critical issues in Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 48: 108–119.
Schuman, Howard, and Presser, Stanley (1977). Question wording as an independent variable in survey analysis.Sociological Methods and Research 6: 151–176.
Shamir, M., and Sullivan, J. (1983). The political context of tolerance: The United States and Israel.American Political Science Review 77: 911–928.
Stouffer, Samuel (1955).Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. New York: Doubleday.
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James E., and Marcus, George E. (1978). Ideological constraint in the mass public: A methodological critique and some new findings.American Journal of Political Science 22: 233–249.
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E. (1979a). An alternative conceptualization of political tolerance: Illusory increases 1950s–1970s.American Political Science Review 73: 781–794.
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James E., Marcus, George E., and Feldman, Stanley (1979b). The more things change, the more they stay the same: The stability of mass belief systems.American Journal of Political Science 23: 176–186.
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James E., Feldman, Stanley, and Marcus, George E. (1981). The sources of political tolerance: A multivariate analysis.American Political Science Review 75: 92–106.
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E. (1982).Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wagner, J. (1984). An alternative test of rational constraint in mass belief systems: An application of developmental theory. Paper delivered at the Midwest Political Science Association meetings in Chicago, April 1984.
Walker, L. J. (1982). The sequentiality of Kohlberg's stages of moral development.Child Development 53: 1330–1336.
Zellman, Gail L. (1975). Antidemocratic beliefs: A survey and some explanations.Journal of Social Issues 31: 31–53.
Zellman, Gail L., and Sears, David O. (1971). Childhood origins of tolerance for dissent.Journal of Social Issues 27: 109–135.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, J. Political tolerance and stages of moral development: A conceptual and empirical alternative. Polit Behav 8, 45–80 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987592
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987592