Journal of population

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 251–265 | Cite as

Effects of social density on men with “close” or “far” personal space

  • Braddie B. Dooley


Personal Space Social Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baron, M., & Rodin, J. Personal control and crowding stress. In A. Baum & Y. Epstein (Eds.),Human response to crowding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., in press.Google Scholar
  2. Byrne, D.The attraction paradigm New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Calhoun, J.B. Population density and social pathology.Scientific American, 1962,206, 139–148.Google Scholar
  4. Christian, J. Phenomena associated with population density.Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1961,47, 428–449.Google Scholar
  5. Cozby, P.C. Effects of density, activity, and personality on environmental preferences.Journal of Research in Personality, 1973,7, 45–60.Google Scholar
  6. Desor, J.A. Toward a psychological theory of crowding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,21, 79–83.Google Scholar
  7. Dooley, B.B. Crowding stress: The effects of social density on men with “close” or “far” personal space. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1974).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1974,35 2460B. (University Microfilms No. 74-24, 585).Google Scholar
  8. Evans, G.W. Behavioral and physiological consequences of crowding in humans.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, G.W., & Howard, R. Personal space.Psychological Bulletin, 1973,80, 334–344.Google Scholar
  10. Glass, D.C. & Singer, J.E.Urban stress. New York: Academic Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  11. Glass, D.C., & Singer, J.E. Experimental studies of uncontrollable and unpredictable noise.Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1973,4, 165–183.Google Scholar
  12. Griffitt, W., & Veitch, R. Hot and crowded: Influence on population density and temperature on interpersonal affective behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971,17, 92–98.Google Scholar
  13. Karabenick, S., & Meisels, M. Effects of performance evaluations on interpersonal distance.Journal of Personality 1972,40, 275–286.Google Scholar
  14. Lazarus, R. Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
  15. Loo, C. Important issues in researching the effects of crowding on humans.Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1973,4, 219–226.Google Scholar
  16. Paulus, P.B., Annis, A.B., Seta, J.J., Schkade, J.K., & Matthews, R.W. Density does affect task performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 248–253.Google Scholar
  17. Proshansky, H.M., Ittelson, W.H., & Rivlin, L.G. Freedom of choice and behavior setting. In H. Proshansky, W. Ittelson, & L. Rivlin (Eds.),Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Inc., 1970.Google Scholar
  18. Schmitt, R.C. Implications of density in Hong Kong.Journal of American Institute of Planners, 1963,29, 210–217.Google Scholar
  19. Schopler, J., & Stokols, D.A psychological approach to human crowding. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press Modular Studies, 1976.Google Scholar
  20. Sherrod, D. Crowding, perceived control, and behavioral aftereffects.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1974,4, 171–186.Google Scholar
  21. Sommer, R.Personal space. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1969.Google Scholar
  22. Stokols, D. On the distinction between density and crowding.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 275–277.Google Scholar
  23. Stokols, D. A social-psychological model of human crowding phenomena.Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1972,38, 72–83.Google Scholar
  24. Stokols, D. The experience of crowding in primary and secondary environments.Environment and Behavior, 1976,8, 49–86.Google Scholar
  25. Stokols, D., Rall, M., Pinner, B., & Schopler, J. Physical, social, and personal determinants of the perception of crowding.Environment and Behavior, 1973,5, 87–116.Google Scholar
  26. Sundstrom, E. Crowding as a sequential process: Review of research on the effects of population density on humans. In A. Baum & Y. Epstein (Eds.),Human response to crowding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., in press.Google Scholar
  27. Worchel, S., & Teddlie, C. The experience of crowding: A two-factor theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 30–40.Google Scholar
  28. Zajonc, R.B. Social facilitation.Science, 1965,149, 269–274.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Braddie B. Dooley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations