Advertisement

Journal of population

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 216–230 | Cite as

Reducing crowding without increasing space: Some applications of an attributional theory of crowding

  • Stephen Worchel
Article

Summary

Given a choice, few people would actively choose to be crowded. Crowding, or more correctly, the lack of crowding, has become a commodity that often determines the value of a particular piece of real estate or location. Viewing crowding as synonomous to density gives a rather dismal prognostication for the fate of millions of people. It is simply impossible to increase the amount of space available to individuals incarcerated in cities, prisons, mental institutions, or other situations where space is at a premium.

However, the present view that links crowding to personal space and attribution offers a more optimistic view. I have attempted to simply scratch the surface of the possible measures that can be utilized to reduce crowding without increasing space. These measures fit both the theory and the research and seem not only to affect perceptions of crowding but also behavioral and interpersonal processes.

While I think the results are encouraging, there are numerous questions that still must be answered before the personal space-attribution formula can be prescribed for public consumption. Such questions involve how lasting the effects of misattribution are in changing people's perceptions and behaviors. Also, can we actually get people to misattribute the cause of their arousal in situations that are familiar to them? That is, will the seasoned subway rider who has taken the subway to work for the last 20 years rearrange his perceptions and feel less crowded in this familiar environment? Before dismissing the possibility of causing these effects, it should be pointed out that this misattribution process has been utilized with some success to treat phobic individuals who have experienced phobia for much of their lives (Cooper, personal communication). In summary, there are still a number of questions to be answered but there are potential benefits from the resent approach to crowding.

Keywords

Personal Communication Potential Benefit Real Estate Public Consumption Personal Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello, J., Epstein, Y., & Karlin, R. Effects of crowding on electrodermal activity.Sociological Symposium, 1975,14, 43–57.Google Scholar
  2. Altman I.The environment and social behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R., & Rodin, J. Perceived control and crowding stress. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, A., Reiss, M., & O'Hara, J. Architectural variants of reaction to spatial invasion.Environment and Behavior, 1974,6, 91–100.Google Scholar
  5. Baum, A., & Valins, S.Architecture and social behavior: Psychological studies in social density. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, in press.Google Scholar
  6. Bergman, B. The effects of group size, personal space, and success-failure on physiological arousal, test performance, and questionnaire response. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Psychology, Temple University, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Desor, J.A., Toward a psychological theory of crowding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,21, 79–83.Google Scholar
  8. Fry, A., & Willis, F. Invasion of personal space as a function of age of the invader.Psychological Record, 1971,21, 385–389.Google Scholar
  9. Freedman, J.Crowding and behavior. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. Hall, E.The hidden dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. Kutner, D. Overcrowding: Human response to density and visual exposure.Human Relations, 1973,26, 31–50.Google Scholar
  12. Middlemist, R., Knowles, E. & Matter, L. Personal space in the lavatory: Suggestive evidence for arousal.Journal for Personality and Social Psychology 1976,33, 541–546.Google Scholar
  13. Petterson, M. An arousal model of intimacy.Psychological Review 1976,83, 235–245.Google Scholar
  14. Paulus, P., Annis, A., Seta, J., Schkade, J., & Matthews, K. Crowding does affect performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 197634, 248–253.Google Scholar
  15. Rodin, J., Crowding, perceived choice, and response to controllable and uncontrollable outcomes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976,12 564–578.Google Scholar
  16. Schachter, S. The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional state. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. I. New York, Academic Press, 1964, 49–81.Google Scholar
  17. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional state.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 379–399.Google Scholar
  18. Stokols, D. On the distinction between density and crowding: Some implications for future research.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 275–278.Google Scholar
  19. Stokols, D. A typology of crowding experiences. In A. Baum & S. Valins (Eds.),Human response to crowding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, in press.Google Scholar
  20. Stokols, D., Rall, M., Pinner, B., & Schopler, J. Physical, social, and personal determinants of the perception of crowding.Environment and Behavior, 1973,5, 87–117.Google Scholar
  21. Stokols, D., Smith, T., & Prostor, J. Partitioning and perceived crowding in a public space.Animal Behavioral Science, 1975,18, 792–814.Google Scholar
  22. Worchel, S., Esterson, C., & Yohai, S. Misattribution and crowding: The effects of arousing and nonarousing films on the experience of crowding. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, 1977.Google Scholar
  23. Worchel, S., & Teddlie, C. The experience of crowding: A two factor theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 30–40.Google Scholar
  24. Worchel, S., & Yohai, S. Role of attribution in the experience of crowding.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
  25. Zanna, M., & Cooper, J. Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,29, 703–709.Google Scholar
  26. Ziller, R. Individuation and socialization.Human Relations 1964,17, 341–360.Google Scholar
  27. Zimbardo, P. The human choice: Individuation, reason and order vs. deindividuation, impulse, and chaos.Nebraska Symposium of Motivation, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Worchel
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VirginiaUSA

Personalised recommendations