Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lying and nonverbal behavior: Theoretical issues and new findings

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conceptual issues about deceit, in specific why lies fail and when and how behavior may betray a lie, provides the basis for considering the type of experimental situations which may be fruitful for the study of deceit. New evidence, integrating past reports with new unpublished findings, compare the relative efficacy of facial, bodily, vocal, paralinguistic and textual measures in discriminating deceptive from honest behavior. The findings show also that most people do not rely upon the most useful sources of information in judging whether someone is lying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davidson, R.J., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1988)Emotional expression and brain physiology I: Approach/withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • DePaulo, B., Lanier, K., & Davis, T. (1983) Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 1096–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B.M., Stone, J.I., & Lassiter, G.D. (1985) Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B.R. Schlenker (Ed.)The self and social life (pp. 323–370). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1972) Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.)Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 207–283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1985).Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, marriage, and politics. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1989). The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion. In H. Wagner & A. Manstead (Eds.),Handbook of social psychophysiology. Chichester: John Wiley, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Davidson, R., & Friesen, W.V. (1988).Emotional expression and brain physiology II: Duchenne's smile. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Ekman, P. & Friesen, W.V. (1969a) The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding.Semiotica, 1 49–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1969b). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception.Psychiatry, 32 88–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1974) Detecting deception from body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1978).Facial action coding system. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Ancoli, S. (1980). Facial signs of emotional experience.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1125–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., O'Sullivan, M., & Scherer, K.R. (1988).Behavioral measurement can distinguish when someone is lying. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Scherer, K.R. (1976). Body movement and pitch in deceptive interaction.Semiotica, 16 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K.U., & Tesser, A. (1988) Deceptive behavior in social relationships: a consequence of violated expectations.Journal of Psychology, 122 263–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, M., Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Scherer, K.R. (1988).Which is more important in judging others: Behavior, channel or situation? Manuscript in preparation.

  • Riggio, R.E., & Friedman, H.S. (1983) Individual differences and cues to deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 899–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K.R. (1982) Methods of research on vocal communication: paradigms and parameters. In K.R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 136–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, L.A., Krauss, R.M., Geller, V., Olson, C. & Apple, W. (1977) Pitch changes during attempted deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 345–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Interaction Laboratory, University of California, 401 Parnassus, 94143, San Francisco, CA

    Paul Ekman

Authors
  1. Paul Ekman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The information reported here also appears inCredibility Assessment—A Unified Theoretical and Research Perspective, J. Yuille (Ed.), in press, Kluwer. The work described was supported by a Research Scientist Award from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH 06092) and a previous grant from NIMH (MH11976).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekman, P. Lying and nonverbal behavior: Theoretical issues and new findings. J Nonverbal Behav 12, 163–175 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987486

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987486

Keywords

Search

Navigation