Abstract
Four studies examined the effects of contextual variables on interpersonal spacing. Contextual variables were defined as transitory factors that involved the setting in which an interaction occurs; these variables were delineated from personal and interpersonal characteristics. In each experimental setting, white male subjects were allowed to choose the distance at which they interacted with a stranger. The first study found that subjects who had experienced social isolation prior to the interaction chose greater distances than subjects who had not been isolated. The second study found that subjects chose greater distances when they believed their interaction would be observed by others than when the interaction was private. Results from the third study yielded an interaction between topic of conversation and expected length of conversation with greatest distance being chosen when subjects expected a long conversation to focus on a personal topic. In the final study, room size and shape influenced interpersonal distance; the interaction indicated that room size affected distance only in rectangular rooms. The results are discussed in terms of equilibrium model (Argyle & Dean, 1965). It is argued that contextual variables affect intimacy, and that the equilibrium model can explicate the effects of contextual as well as personal and interpersonal variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, I.The environment and social behavior. Monterey, California: Brooks Cole. 1975.
Altman, I. & Vinzel, A. An analysis of E. T. Hall's proxemics framework. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.).Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research, (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum, 181–260. 1977.
Archer, R., Hormuth, S., & Berg, J. Avoidance of self-disclosure: An experiment under conditions of self-awareness.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982,8, 122–128.
Argyle, M. & Dean, J. Eye-contact, distance, and affiliation.Sociometry, 1965,28, 289–304.
Arkin, R. Self presentation. In D. Wegner & R. Vallacher (Eds.)The self in social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. 1980.
Ashton, N. & Shaw, M. E. Empirical investigations of a reconceptualized personal space.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980,15, 309–312.
Baker, E. & Shaw, M. E. Reactions to interpersonal distance and topic intimacy: A comparison of strangers and friends.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1980,5, 80–91.
Baum, A. & Valins, S. C.Architecture and social behavior: Psychological studies in social density. Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum, 1977.
Brehm, S.Intimate relationships. New York: Random House, 1985.
Bombard, A.The voyage of the Heritigue. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1953.
Brown, C. Shared space invasion and race.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981,7, 103–108.
Byrd, R. E.Alone. London: Neville Speriman, 1938.
Cochran, C., Hale, W., & Hissam, C. Personal space requirements in indoor versus outdoor locations.The Journal of Psychology, 1984,117, 121–123.
Cottrell, N. B. Performance in the presence of other human beings: Mere presence, audience, and affiliation effects. In E. Samuel, R. Hoppe, & G. Multon (Eds.).Social facilitation and imitative behaviors. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1968.
Desor, J. Toward a psychological theory of crowding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,21, 79–83.
Duval, S. & Wicklund, R.A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press. 1973.
Fisher, J. & Byrne, D. Too close for comfort: Sex differences in response to invasions of personal space.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975,32, 15–21.
Fiske, S. & Taylor, S.Social cognition. Reading Mass.: Addison Wesley. 1984.
Hall, E. T.The silent language. New York: Fawcett, 1959.
Hall, E. T.The hidden discussion. New York: Doubleday. 1966.
Hayduk, L. A. Personal space: An evaluative and orienting overview.Psychology Bulletin, 1978,94, 293–335.
Knight, R., Weitzer, W., & Zimring, C.Opportunity for control and the built environment: The ELEMR Project. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Environmental Institute, 1978.
Knowles, E. S. Boundaries around social space: Dyadic responses to an invader.Environment and Behavior, 1972,4, 437–447.
Lay, G. & Pavio, A. The effect of task difficulty and anxiety on hesitations in speech.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1969,1, 25–37.
McArthur, L. What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and casual attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. Herman, & M. Zanna (Eds.).Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. 1981.
McBride, G., King, M., & James, J. Social proximity effects on galvanic skin responses in adult humans.The Journal of Psychology, 1965,61, 153–157.
Patterson, M. An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy.Psychology Review, 1976,83, 235–245.
Savinar, J. The effect of ceiling height on personal space.Man-Environment Systems, 1975,5, 321–324.
Schachter, S.The psychology of affiliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1954.
Scheier, M. & Carver, C. Self-focused attention and the experience of emotion: Attraction, repulsion, elation, and depression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977,35, 635–636.
Slocum, J.Sailing alone around the world. London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1948.
Storms, M. Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actor's and observer's points of view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973,27, 165–175.
Sundstrom, E. A test of equilibrium theory: Effects of topic intimacy and proximity on verbal and nonverbal behavioral in friends and strangers.Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 1978,3, 3–16.
Swingle, P. Temporal measures of vocalizations: Some methodological considerations.Journal of Personality, 1984,47, 1263–1280.
Tennis, G. & Dabbs, J. Sex, setting, and personal space: First grade through college.Sociometry, 1975,38, 385–394.
White, M. Interpersonal distance as affected by room size, status, and sex.Journal of Social Psychology, 1965,95, 241–249.
Wicklund, R. Objective self-awareness. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.).Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press. 1975.
Worchel, S. & Teddlie, C. The experience of crowding: A two-factor theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 30–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The help of the following people in conducting the research and analyzing the data is gratefully acknowledged: Elizabeth Brown, Brad Reeves, Michael Satir, Sheryl Vaughn, Mary Holland, Quig Lawrence, William Webb, and Kerry Marsh. Thanks are also in order for an unusually thorough reviewer who raised a number of important issues.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Worchel, S. The influence of contextual variables on interpersonal spacing. J Nonverbal Behav 10, 230–254 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987482
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987482