Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of contextual variables on interpersonal spacing

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four studies examined the effects of contextual variables on interpersonal spacing. Contextual variables were defined as transitory factors that involved the setting in which an interaction occurs; these variables were delineated from personal and interpersonal characteristics. In each experimental setting, white male subjects were allowed to choose the distance at which they interacted with a stranger. The first study found that subjects who had experienced social isolation prior to the interaction chose greater distances than subjects who had not been isolated. The second study found that subjects chose greater distances when they believed their interaction would be observed by others than when the interaction was private. Results from the third study yielded an interaction between topic of conversation and expected length of conversation with greatest distance being chosen when subjects expected a long conversation to focus on a personal topic. In the final study, room size and shape influenced interpersonal distance; the interaction indicated that room size affected distance only in rectangular rooms. The results are discussed in terms of equilibrium model (Argyle & Dean, 1965). It is argued that contextual variables affect intimacy, and that the equilibrium model can explicate the effects of contextual as well as personal and interpersonal variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, I.The environment and social behavior. Monterey, California: Brooks Cole. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I. & Vinzel, A. An analysis of E. T. Hall's proxemics framework. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.).Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research, (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum, 181–260. 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R., Hormuth, S., & Berg, J. Avoidance of self-disclosure: An experiment under conditions of self-awareness.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1982,8, 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. & Dean, J. Eye-contact, distance, and affiliation.Sociometry, 1965,28, 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkin, R. Self presentation. In D. Wegner & R. Vallacher (Eds.)The self in social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, N. & Shaw, M. E. Empirical investigations of a reconceptualized personal space.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980,15, 309–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. & Shaw, M. E. Reactions to interpersonal distance and topic intimacy: A comparison of strangers and friends.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 1980,5, 80–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A. & Valins, S. C.Architecture and social behavior: Psychological studies in social density. Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S.Intimate relationships. New York: Random House, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bombard, A.The voyage of the Heritigue. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. Shared space invasion and race.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981,7, 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, R. E.Alone. London: Neville Speriman, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, C., Hale, W., & Hissam, C. Personal space requirements in indoor versus outdoor locations.The Journal of Psychology, 1984,117, 121–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, N. B. Performance in the presence of other human beings: Mere presence, audience, and affiliation effects. In E. Samuel, R. Hoppe, & G. Multon (Eds.).Social facilitation and imitative behaviors. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desor, J. Toward a psychological theory of crowding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,21, 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, S. & Wicklund, R.A theory of objective self-awareness. New York: Academic Press. 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. & Byrne, D. Too close for comfort: Sex differences in response to invasions of personal space.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975,32, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. & Taylor, S.Social cognition. Reading Mass.: Addison Wesley. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T.The silent language. New York: Fawcett, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T.The hidden discussion. New York: Doubleday. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. A. Personal space: An evaluative and orienting overview.Psychology Bulletin, 1978,94, 293–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R., Weitzer, W., & Zimring, C.Opportunity for control and the built environment: The ELEMR Project. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Environmental Institute, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, E. S. Boundaries around social space: Dyadic responses to an invader.Environment and Behavior, 1972,4, 437–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, G. & Pavio, A. The effect of task difficulty and anxiety on hesitations in speech.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 1969,1, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, L. What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and casual attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. Herman, & M. Zanna (Eds.).Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, G., King, M., & James, J. Social proximity effects on galvanic skin responses in adult humans.The Journal of Psychology, 1965,61, 153–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy.Psychology Review, 1976,83, 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savinar, J. The effect of ceiling height on personal space.Man-Environment Systems, 1975,5, 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S.The psychology of affiliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. & Carver, C. Self-focused attention and the experience of emotion: Attraction, repulsion, elation, and depression.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977,35, 635–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, J.Sailing alone around the world. London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storms, M. Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actor's and observer's points of view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973,27, 165–175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, E. A test of equilibrium theory: Effects of topic intimacy and proximity on verbal and nonverbal behavioral in friends and strangers.Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 1978,3, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingle, P. Temporal measures of vocalizations: Some methodological considerations.Journal of Personality, 1984,47, 1263–1280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennis, G. & Dabbs, J. Sex, setting, and personal space: First grade through college.Sociometry, 1975,38, 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. Interpersonal distance as affected by room size, status, and sex.Journal of Social Psychology, 1965,95, 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. Objective self-awareness. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.).Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, S. & Teddlie, C. The experience of crowding: A two-factor theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976,34, 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The help of the following people in conducting the research and analyzing the data is gratefully acknowledged: Elizabeth Brown, Brad Reeves, Michael Satir, Sheryl Vaughn, Mary Holland, Quig Lawrence, William Webb, and Kerry Marsh. Thanks are also in order for an unusually thorough reviewer who raised a number of important issues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Worchel, S. The influence of contextual variables on interpersonal spacing. J Nonverbal Behav 10, 230–254 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987482

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987482

Keywords

Navigation