Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 238–254 | Cite as

Getting well: Impression management as stroke rehabilitation

  • Steven J. Gold


Participant observation, interview and photographic data reveal how stroke victims are taught impression management skills to cope with the physical limitations and sick role status brought on by their ailment. Their rehabilitation process is collective, intentional and seeks to have stroke victims redefined as normal, healthy individuals. This analysis focuses on the group's work to demedicalize the social definition of their condition.


Social Psychology Healthy Individual Social Issue Physical Limitation Cross Cultural Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Heart Association 1981a Strokes: A Guide for the Family.Google Scholar
  2. American Heart Association 1981b An Older Person's Guide to Cardiovascular Health.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, Howard S. 1963 Outsiders. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. 1974 “Photography and sociology.” Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication 1:3–26.Google Scholar
  5. Conrad, Peter and Joseph Schneider 1980 Deviance and Medicalization. St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, Fred 1963 Passage Through Crisis. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  7. Durkheim, Emile 1933 The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  8. Emerson, Joan P. 1970 “Behavior in private places: Sustaining definitions of reality in gynecological examinations.” Pp. 74–93 in Hans Peter Drietzel (ed.), Recent Sociology No.2. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, Michel 1965 Madness and Civilization. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  10. 1980 History of Sexualilty. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Fowler, R. S. and Fordyce, W. E. n. d. Stroke: Why do They Behave That Way. Dallas: American Heart Association.Google Scholar
  12. Freese, Dr. Arthur S. 1980 Stroke: The New Hope and the New Help. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  13. Freidson, Elliot 1970 The Profession of Medicine. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  14. Garfinkel, Harold 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Goffman, Erving 1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  16. 1963 Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. 1967 Interaction Ritual. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
  18. 1974 Frame Analysis. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
  19. 1979 Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
  20. Hochschild, Arlie R. 1979 “Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure.” American Journal of Sociology 84: 551–75.Google Scholar
  21. Parsons, Talcott 1951 The Social System. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. 1958 “Definitions of health and illness in the light of American values and social structure.” In E. Gartley Jaco (ed.), Patients, Physicians and Illness, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Roth, Julius 1963 Timetables. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  24. Schutz, Alfred 1944 “The stranger: An essay in social psychology.” American Journal of Sociology 49: 499–507.Google Scholar
  25. Zola, Irving K. 1972 “Medicine as an institution of social control.” Sociological Review 20: 487–504.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven J. Gold
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeley

Personalised recommendations