Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 236–252 | Cite as

Role distancing: Differentiating the role of the elderly from the person

  • Marnie L. Sayles
Articles

Abstract

Elderly participants in an “extended care” class at a senior citizen's center were observed to determine if some of them could continually distance themselves from the “client” role. Although earlier research suggests that people can use role distancing techniques to disassociate themselves successfully fromoccasionally played roles or certain aspects of a role, it is unclear whether or how people successfully disassociate themselvescontinually from enacted roles. Using a symbolic interactionist's definition of role, this paper attempts to 1) classify the circumstances which give rise to both occasional and continual role distancing; 2) specify the conditions under which disassociation from continually enacted roles may be successful; and 3) suggest the relevance of the data to studies on low-status occupations, deviance, and role theory.

Keywords

Social Psychology Social Issue Early Research Cross Cultural Psychology Senior Citizen 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, Gordon W. 1954 The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Archibald, W. Peter 1976 “Face-to-face: The alienating effects of class, status, and power divisions.” American Sociological Review 41:819–837.Google Scholar
  3. Blumer, Herbert 1969 Symbolic Interaction. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Cavan, Ruth S. 1962 “Self and role in adjustment during old age.” Pp. 526–536 in A. Rose (ed.), Human Behavior and Social Processes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  5. Ford, Julienne, Douglas Young, and Steven Box 1967 “Functional autonomy, role distance and social class.” British Journal of Sociology 18:370–381.Google Scholar
  6. Glaser, Barney G. and A.L. Strauss 1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  7. Goffman, Erving 1961 Encounters. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  8. Henry, Jules 1963 Culture against Man. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  9. Kahn, Robert L., D.M. Wolfe, R.P. Quinn, and J.D. Snoek 1964 Organizational Stress. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Kelly, Harold H. and John L. Michela 1980 “Attribution theory and research.” Pp. 457–501 in M.R. Rosenzweig and L.W. Porter (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology Vol. 31. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
  11. Levitin, T.E. 1964 “Role performance and role distance in a low status occupation: The puller.” Sociological Quarterly 5:251–260.Google Scholar
  12. Louis Harris and Associates, Inc. 1976 The Myth and Reality of Aging in America. Washington, D.C.: National Council on the Aging.Google Scholar
  13. Rosow, Irving 1974 Socialization to Old Age. Berkelely: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sayles, Marnie L. 1980 “Role differentiation in a homogeneous group: A case study of elderly in an extended care group at a multi-purpose center.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  15. Seeman, Melvin 1966 “Status and identity: The problem of inauthenticity.” Pacific Sociological Review 9:67–73.Google Scholar
  16. Sieber, Sam D. 1974 “Toward a theory of role accumulation.” American Sociological Review 39:567–578.Google Scholar
  17. Stebbins, Robert A. 1967 “A note on the concept of role distance.” American Journal of Sociology 73:247–250.Google Scholar
  18. —— 1975 “Role distance, role distance behavior and jazz musicians.” Pp. 133–141 in D. Brissett and C. Edgley (eds.) Life as Theater: A Dramaturgical Sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  19. Turner, Ralph H. 1956 “Role-taking, role standpoint, and reference group behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 61:316–328.Google Scholar
  20. —— 1962 “Role-taking: Process versus conformity.” Pp. 20–40 in A.M. Rose (ed.), Human Behavior and Social Processes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  21. -- “Role theory: A series of propositions.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  22. —— 1968 “Role: Sociological aspects.” Pp. 552–557 in D.L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences Vol. 13. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. —— 1976 “The real self: From institution to impulse.” American Journal of Sociology 81:986–1016.Google Scholar
  24. —— 1978 “The role and the person.” American Journal of Sociology 84:1–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marnie L. Sayles
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Hawaii-HiloHilo

Personalised recommendations