Abstract
This article is based upon a factorial design field experiment conducted during the 1980 election campaign. The experiment was conducted to assess whether there is an optimal message strategy available to local party workers in their efforts to inform and persuade voters. The study assesses whether the timing of communications, i.e., near or distant to election day, and the order of message presentation, i.e., whether presenting important information early or late in a communication, have any effects upon voters' information levels and electoral decisions. The analysis supports an interpretation of recency effects, i.e., information presented last in a partisan appeal was more likely to facilitate information and persuasion effects than information positioned first. However, this finding was conditioned upon the timing of message presentation with appeals referencing familiar partisan material only effective near to election day and appeals referencing less familiar and nonpartisan material only effective further from election day.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agranoff, R. (1976).The Management of Election Campaigns Boston: Holbrook Press.
Atkin, C. K. (1980). Political campaigns: Mass communication and persuasion. In M. E. Roloff and G. R. Miller (eds.),Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
Baer, D. L., Bositis, D. A., and Miller, R. E. (1981). A field experimental study of a precinct committeeman's canvassing efforts in a primary election: cognitive effects. In M. Burgoon (ed.),Communication Yearbook, 5. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.
Ballenger, G., and Hennessy, B. (1974). Door-to-door canvassing pays off: An experimental study in a nonpartisan suburb.Experimental study of politics 3:1–14.
Blydenburgh, J. C. (1971). A controlled experiment to measure the effects of personal contact campaigning.Midwest Journal of Political Science 15:365–381.
Bochel, J. M., and Denver, D. T. (1971). Canvassing, turnout and party support: an experiment.British Journal of Political Science 1:257–269.
Bositis, D. A., and Miller, R. E. (1982). Factors affecting the successful communication of cognitive information by a precinct committeeman. In M. Burgoon (ed.),Communication Yearbook 6. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
Burgoon, M., and Bettinghaus, E. P. (1980). Persuasive message strategies. In M. E. Roloff and G. R. Miller (eds.),Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., and Stokes, D. E. (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Campbell, D. T., and Stanley, J. C. (1963).Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Eldersveld, S. J., and Dodge, R. W. (1954). Personaanl contact or mail propaganda? An experiment in voting turnout and attitude change. In D. Katz (ed.),Public Opinion and Propaganda. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Glaser, W. A. (1965–1966). Television and voting turnout.Public Opinion Quarterly 29:71–86.
Gosnell, H. F. (1927).Getting Out the Vote: An Experiment in the Stimulation of Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hovland, C. I. (1959). Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change.American Psychologist 14:8–17.
Hovland, C. I., and Mandel, W. (1957). Is there a “law of primacy” in persuasion? In Hovland, ed.,Yale Studies in Attitude and Communication, Vol. I.
Hovland, C. I., ed. (1957).Yale Studies in Attitude and Communication, Vol. I, The Order of Presentation in Persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Jennings, M. K., and Niemi, R. G. (1981).Generations and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keppel, G. (1973).Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Kramer, G. (1970–1971). The effects of precinet level canvassing on voting behavior.Public Opinion Quarterly 34:560–572.
Lana, R. E. (1961). Familiarity and the order of presentation of persuasive communications.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62:573–577.
Lana, R. E. (1963). Interest, media and order effects in persuasive communications.Journal of Psychology 56:9–13.
Lana, R. E. (1964). Three theoretical interpretations of order effects in persuasive communications.Psychological Bulletin 61:314–320.
Lund, F. H. (1925). The psychology of belief.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 20:174–196.
Merelman, R. M. (1971).Political Socialization and Educational Climates. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Milbrath, L. W., and Goel, M. L. (1977).Political Participation. (2nd ed.) Chicago: Rand McNally.
Miller, G. R., and Burgoon, M. (1978). Persuasion research: Review and commentary. In B. D. Rubin (ed.),Communication Yearbook 2. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.
Miller, N., and Campbell, D. T. (1959). Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 59:1–9.
Miller, R. E., Bositis, D. A., and Baer, D. L. (1981). Stimulating voter turnout in a primary election: A field experiment with a precinct committeeman.International Political Science Review 2:445–460.
Miller, R. E., Bositis, D. A., and Baer, D. L. (1982). Local party activity and the policy preferences of voters: A field experiment. Paper presented at the Southwestern Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas.
Miller, R. E., and Richey, W. M. (1980). The effects of a campaign brochure “drop” in a county level race for state's attorney. In D. Nimmo (ed.),Communication Yearbook 4. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.
Miller, R. E., and Robyn, D. L. (1975). A field experimental study of direct mail in a congressional campaign: What effects last until election day?Experimental Study of Politics 4:1–37.
Orum, A. M., Cohen, R. S., Grasmuck, S., and Orum, A. W. (1977). Sex, socialization and politics. In M. Githens and J. L. Prestage (eds.),A Portrait of Marginality. New York: David McKay.
Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., and Brock, T. C. (1981).Cognitive Responses in Persuasion. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosnow, R., and Goldstein, J. (1967). Familiarity, salience and order of presentation of communications.Journal of Social Psychology 73:97–110.
Rosnow, R. L., and Robinson, E. J. (1967).Experiments in Persuasion. New York: Academic Press.
Wolfinger, R. (1963). The influence of precient work on voting behavior.Public Opinion Quarterly 27:387–398.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bositis, D.A., Baer, D.L. & Miller, R.E. Cognitive information levels, voter preferences, and local partisan political activity: A field experimental study on the effects of timing and order of message presentation. Polit Behav 7, 266–284 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987309
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987309