Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 96–104 | Cite as

Effect of individual differences in nonverbal expressiveness on transmission of emotion

  • Howard S. Friedman
  • Ronald E. Riggio
Article

Abstract

This study tested the possibility that individual differences in nonverbal expressiveness may function as a mediating factor in the transmission of emotion through social comparison. In a quasi-experimental design, small groups consisting of one expressive person and two unexpressive people were created in which the participants sat facing each other without talking for two minutes. Self-report measures of mood indicated that the feelings of the unexpressive people were influenced by the expressive people but the expressive people were relatively unlikely to be influenced by the unexpressive people. The findings have implications for the role of nonverbal communication in the emotional side of group interaction.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argyle, M.Bodily communication. New York: International Universities Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., & Ellsworth, P.Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and integration of findings. New York: Pergamon Press, Inc., 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Ellsworth, P., Friedman, H. S., Perlick, D., & Hoyt, M. Effects of direct gaze on subjects motivated to seek or avoid social comparison.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1978,14, 69–87.Google Scholar
  4. Friedman, H. S. The concept of skill in nonverbal communication: Implications for understanding social interaction. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.)Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, H. S., Prince, L. M., Riggio, R. E., & DiMatteo, R. Understanding and assessing nonverbal expressiveness: The Affective Communication Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980,39, 333–351.Google Scholar
  6. Maranon, G. The psychology of gesture.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1950,112, 469–497.Google Scholar
  7. Marshall, G.D., & Zimbardo, P. G. Affective consequences of inadequately explained physiological arousal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37, 970–988.Google Scholar
  8. Riggio, R. E. Verbal and nonverbal cues of deception. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Riverside, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Rosenthal, R. (Ed.)Skill in nonverbal communication. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. Schachter, S.The psychology of affiliation: Experimental studies of the source of gregariousness. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  11. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotion.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 379–399.Google Scholar
  12. Wrightsman, L.S. Effects of waiting with others on changes in level of felt anxiety.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960,61, 216–222.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard S. Friedman
    • 1
  • Ronald E. Riggio
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiverside

Personalised recommendations