Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 62–74 | Cite as

Information and party voting in “semipartisan” judicial elections

  • Lawrence Baum
Article

Abstract

Research on the relationship between the quantity of information that voters possess and their party voting behavior in partisan elections has produced mixed and confusing empirical results. In an effort to provide a broader perspective, this paper explores that relationship in nonpartisan elections contested by candidates of opposing parties. The paper analyzes survey data on two 1984 contests for seats on the Ohio Supreme Court, using the presidential race for comparison. Despite a highly partisan campaign, party defections by voters were far more common in the supreme court races than in the presidential race, reflecting the importance of party designations on the ballot as a source of information on candidates' party affiliations. At the individual level, levels of information had differing effects in the two supreme court races and for Democratic and Republican voters; this finding suggests that the impact of imformation levels on voters' choices is conditioned by the content of information in particular campaigns.

Keywords

Survey Data Empirical Result Broad Perspective Vote Behavior Political Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adrian, Charles R. (1959). A typology for nonpartisan elections.Western Political Quarterly 12: 449–458.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, Kathleen L. (1971). Ohio judicial elections — nonpartisan premises with partisan results.Ohio State Law Journal 32: 762–789.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, Kathleen L. (1984). Judicial politics in Ohio. In Carl Lieberman (ed.),Government and Politics in Ohio, pp. 89–133. Lanham, Md.: University Press of American.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, Lawrence (1983). The electoral fates of incumbent judges in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas.Judicature 66: 420–430.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, Clifford F. (1984). The trend of workers' compensation in Ohio: Ohio puts the workers back into workers' compensation.Capital University Law Review 13: 521–532.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, Maureen (1984). Battering races for supreme court near finish.Dayton Daily News (October 28): 1-F.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, Angus (1960). Surge and decline: a study of electoral change.Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 397–418.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, Anne (1982). Ohio's high court marked by bickering, partisanship.Columbus Citizen-Journal (October 8): 7.Google Scholar
  9. Converse, Philip E. (1962). Information flow and the stability of partisan attitudes.Public Opinion Quarterly 26: 578–599.Google Scholar
  10. Conway, M. Margaret (1969). Political participation in a nonpartisan local election.Public Opinion Quarterly 33: 425–430.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, Herb, Jr., and West, Sharon Crook (1983). Ohio lawyers ask: Is this any way to run the supreme court? Frank Celebrezze answers: Damn right!Columbus Monthly (July): 50–56, 121–124.Google Scholar
  12. Dubois, Philip L. (1980).From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dubois, Philip L. (1984). Voting cues in nonpartisan trial court elections: a multivariate assessment.Law and Society Review 18: 395–436.Google Scholar
  14. Hawley, Willis D. (1973).Nonpartisan Elections and the Case for Party Politics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Hinckley, Barbara (1976). Issues, information costs, and congressional elections.American Politics Quarterly 4: 131–152.Google Scholar
  16. Hinckley, Barbara, Hofstetter, Richard, and Kessel, John (1974). Information and the vote: a comparative election study.American Politics Quarterly 2: 131–158.Google Scholar
  17. Kessel, John H. (1984).Presidential Campaign Politics: Coalition Strategies and Citizen Response. Homewood, Ill: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lee, Eugene C. (1960).The Politics of Nonpartisanship. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Macaluso, Theodore F. (1977). Political information, party identification and voting defection.Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 255–260.Google Scholar
  20. Mueller, John E. (1970). Choosing among 133 candidates.Public Opinion Quarterly 34: 395–402.Google Scholar
  21. Pomper, Gerald (1966). Ethnic and group voting in nonpartisan municipal elections.Public Opinion Quarterly 30: 79–97.Google Scholar
  22. Salisbury, Robert H., and Black, Gordon (1963). Class and party in partisan and nonpartisan elections: the case of Des Moines.American Political Science Review 57: 584–592.Google Scholar
  23. Shaffer, Stephen D. (1978). Voting behavior in congressional, gubernatorial, and presidential elections: a comparative analysis. Unpublished dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  24. Shaffer, Stephen D. (1982). Voting in four elective offices: a comparative analysis.American Politics Quarterly 10: 5–30.Google Scholar
  25. Welch, Susan, and Bledsoe, Timothy (1986). The partisan consequences of nonpartisan elections and the changing nature of urban politics.American Journal of Political Science 30: 128–139.Google Scholar
  26. Wright, Gerald C., Jr. (1974).Electoral Choice in America. Chapel Hill: Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence Baum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceOhio State UniversityColumbus

Personalised recommendations