Skip to main content

Candidate choice before the convention: The democrats in 1984

Political Behavior volume 9, pages 49–61 (1987)Cite this article

Abstract

This paper analyzes prenomination presidential candidate preferences, using data from the Center for Political Studies' 1984 Continuous Monitoring Survey. Among Democratic identifiers, affective evaluations of the candidates were the strongest influence on candidate preference, but judgments concerning the candidates' nomination prospects and electability also influenced candidate preference, as did strength of party identification. The outcomes of particular primaries strongly influenced voters' opinions regarding the candidates' nomination prospects and, indirectly, their electability. Walter Mondale's decisive victory in the New York primary on April 3 apparently led to a “bandwagon effect” among Democratic voters across the nation; that is, the perception that Mondale was very likely to win the nomination produced a dramatic shift in candidate preference toward Mondale and away from Gary Hart.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (Canada)

References

  • Abramowitz, Alan I., and Stone, Walter J. (1984).Nomination Politics: Party Activists and Presidential Choice. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arterton, F. Christopher (1984).Media Politics. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. M. (1985). Expectations and preferences in presidential nominating campaigns.American Political Science Review 79: 804–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopoian, J. David. (1982). Issue preferences and candidate choice in presidential primaries.American Journal of Political Science 26: 523–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lengle, James I. (1981).Representation and Presidential Primaries. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, William D., and Davis, Otto (1975). The sport of kings: turnout in presidential preference primaries. Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.

  • Ranney, Austin (1968). The representativeness of primary electorates.Midwest Journal of Political Science 12: 224–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, Austin (1972). Turnout and representation in presidential primary elections.American Political Science Review 66: 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, Austin (1983).Channels of Power: The Impact of Television on American Politics. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Walter J., and Abramowitz, Alan I. (1983). Winning isn't everything, but it's more than we thought: presidential party activists in 1980.American Political Science Review 77: 945–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattier, Mark J. (1983). Ideological voting in 1980 Republican presidential primaries.Journal of Politics 45: 1016–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Daniel C., Weber, Stephen J., Haaland, Gordon A., Mueller, Ronald H., and Craig, Robert E. (1976). Voter decision-making in a primary election: an evaluation of three models of choice.American Journal of Political Science 20: 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 11794-4392, Stony Brook, NY

    Alan I. Abramowitz

Authors
  1. Alan I. Abramowitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abramowitz, A.I. Candidate choice before the convention: The democrats in 1984. Polit Behav 9, 49–61 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987278

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987278

Keywords

  • Strong Influence
  • Continuous Monitoring
  • Dramatic Shift
  • Affective Evaluation
  • Party Identification