Abstract
The “neutrality hypothesis” suggests that the erosion of partisan loyalties in the United States does not reflect a growing sense of alienation from the party system, or a loss of public confidence in political parties generally. Instead, we are told that many independents simply regard the parties as irrelevant in the search for solutions to our most important national problems. The following report challenges the assumption that such beliefs necessarily lead citizens to express neutral feelings toward either the Democrats or the Republicans, or toward both. Data from the CPS election studies show, first, that aggregate levels of neutrality are about the same today as they were 20 years ago and, second, that there is a relationship between nonpartisanship and negative views concerning the parties' capacity to serve as representative (or linkage) institutions in democratic politics. It is our contention that, to some degree, this relationship can help us to account for the weakening of partisan attachments since 1964. If we are correct, a restoration of the parties' mass base will be even more difficult to achieve than the neutrality hypothesis implies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson, Paul R., and Finifter, Ada W. (1981). On the meaning of political trust: new evidence from items introduced in 1978.American Journal of Political Science 25: 297–307.
Black, Merle, and Rabinowitz, George B. (1980). American electoral change: 1952–1972 (with a note on 1976). In William Crotty (ed.),The Party Symbol, pp. 226–256. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Converse, Philip E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In David E. Apter (ed.),Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–261. New York: The Free Press.
Craig, Stephen C., and Maggiotto, Michael A. (1982). Measuring political efficacy.Political Methodology 8: 85–109.
Dennis, Jack (1980). Changing public support for the American party system. In William J. Crotty (ed.),Paths to Political Reform, pp. 35–66. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.
Katz, Richard J. (1979). The dimensionality of party identification: cross-national perspectives.Comparative Politics 11: 147–163.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Schneider, William (1983).The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind. New York: The Free Press.
Miller, Arthur H. (1983). Is confidence rebounding?Public Opinion 6: 16–20.
Miller, Arthur H., and Wattenberg, Martin P. (1983). Measuring party identification: independent or no partisan preference?American Journal of Political Science 27: 106–121.
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R. (1976).The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Shively, W. Phillips (1980). The nature of party identification: a review of recent developments. In John C. Pierce and John L. Sullivan (eds.),The Electorate Reconsidered, pp. 219–236. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Trilling, Richard J. (1976).Party Image and Electoral Behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Wattenberg, Martin P. (1981). The decline of political partisanship in the United States: negativity or neutrality?American Political Science Review 75: 941–950.
Wattenberg, Martin P. (1984).The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1980. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Weisberg, Herbert F. (1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification.Political Behavior 2: 33–60.
Weisberg, Herbert F. (1983). A new scale of partisanship.Political Behavior 5: 363–376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Craig, S.C. The decline of partisanship in the United States: A reexamination of the neutrality hypothesis. Polit Behav 7, 57–78 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987262
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987262