Skip to main content
Log in

Consistency in policy thinking

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines consistency in opinion on a variety of important state and national policy questions. The data come from a two-wave panel study of adult Floridians conducted in 1981 and 1982. Wide variations in consistency of opinion over the 1-year period are found. Salience has an important impact on consistency, with respondents who find an issue salient almost always exhibiting more consistent opinions, but salience cannot explain the variations in consistency across issues. The level of government on which the issue is focused (national or state) has no bearing on consistency. Most important, the particular nature of the issue itself, especially how central it is to the individual and how long it has occupied the political agenda (maturity), affects consistency of opinion. Centrality and maturity both contribute to issue attitude consistency and even can compensate for one another. Both highly central new issues and remote old issues can produce consistent attitudes, but deficiences in centrality seem to override issue maturity. These findings illustrate the value of looking beyond opinion distributions to the meaning of the survey response. With information on consistency and its sources, the public opinion analyst can interpret polling results intelligently, and the study of public opinion can become more objective and scientific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achen, Christopher H. (1975). “Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response.”American Political Science Review 64: 1218–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, George F., Alfred J. Tuchfarber, and Robert W. Oldendick (1978). “Change in the Structure of American Political Attitudes: The Nagging Question of Question Wording.”American Journal of Political Science 22: 250–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, George F., Alfred J. Tuchfarber, and Robert W. Oldendick (1980). “Experiments in Filtering Political Opinions.”Political Behavior 2:339–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (1960).The American Voter. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson (1980). “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.”American Political Science Review 74:78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson (1981). “Issue Evolution, Population Replacement, and Normal Partisan Change.”American Political Science Review 75:107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1964). “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In David Apter (ed.),Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–261. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1966). “Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes.” In Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (eds.),Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley, pp. 136–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1970). “Attitudes and Non-attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” In Edward F. Tufte (ed.),The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 168–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1974). “Comment: The Status of Nonattitudes.”American Political Science Review 68:650–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1975). “Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.),Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 4. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 75–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E., and Gregory B. Markus (1979). “Plus ca change ...: The New CPS Election Study Panel.”American Political Science Review 73:32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E., and Howard Schuman (1970). “‘Silent Majorities’ and the Vietnam War.”Scientific American 222:17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S. (1979). “The SRC Panel Data and Mass Political Attitudes.”British Journal of Political Science 9:89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Benjamin (1982).The Consequences of Consent. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent, and Harmon Zeigler (1970). “The Salience of American State Politics.”American Political Science Review 64 (June):523–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keene, Karlyn H., and Victoria A. Sackett (1981). “An Editor's Report on the Yankelovich, Skelly, and White ‘Mushiness Index’.”Public Opinion 4 (April/May):50–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, V. O., Jr., (1961).Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin (1976). “The Wavering Polls.”The Public Interest 43:70–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman H., with Kristi Andersen (1974). “Mass Belief Systems Revisited: Political Change and Attitude Structure.”Journal of Politics 36:540–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, John C., and Douglas D. Rose (1974). “Nonattitudes and American Public Opinion: The Examination of a Thesis.”American Political Science Review 68:626–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Douglas D., and John C. Pierce (1974). “Rejoinder to ‘Comment’ by Philip E. Converse.”American Political Science Review 68:661–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, Howard, and Stanley Presser (1980). “Public Opinion and Public Ignorance: The Fine Line Between Attitudes and Non-attitudes.”American Journal of Sociology 85:1214–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, John L., James E. Piereson, and George E. Marcus (1978). “Ideological Constraint in the Mass Public.”American Journal of Political Science 22:233–249.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beck, P.A., Parker, S. Consistency in policy thinking. Polit Behav 7, 37–56 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987261

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987261

Keywords

Navigation