Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 352–373 | Cite as

Who riots? An empirical examination of the “new urban black” versus the social marginality hypotheses

  • T. David Mason
  • Jerry A. Murtagh
Article

Abstract

Much of the research on the socioeconomic characteristics of rioters has centered around the question of whether rioters were the dispossessed fringes of the black community who rioted “for fun and profit” or the more upwardly mobile segments of the black community who used civil violence as a means of political influence. This study presents evidence that willingness to participate in civil violence is fairly evenly distributed across income, educational, and occupational strata, thereby disconfirming the social marginality hypothesis. However, militancy involves nonviolent protest as well as civil violence. In order to explore the complexities of this concept, the authors use discriminant function analysis to demonstrate that, while violence propensity is related to age but not socioeconomic status, the willingness to participate in nonviolent protests is associated with higher socioeconomic status. A tentative explanation of this pattern of relationships is offered, with the more politically motivated militancy of higher status groups being linked to their desire to eliminate various forms of racial discrimination.

Keywords

Socioeconomic Status Discriminant Function High Status Status Group Racial Discrimination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banfield, Edwin (1968).The Unheavenly City Revisited. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, Gary S. (1958).The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, Angus, and Schuman, Howard (1968). Racial attitudes in fifteen American cities.Supplemental Studies for the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Caplan, Nathan (1970). The new Ghetto man: A review of recent empirical findings.Journal of Social Issues 26:59–73.Google Scholar
  5. Caplan, Nathan, and Paige, Jeffrey (1968). A study of ghetto rioters.Scientific American 219:15–21.Google Scholar
  6. Chalmers, James A., and Shelton, R. B. (1975). An economic analysis of riot participation.Economic Inquiry 13:322–336.Google Scholar
  7. Downes, Brian (1968). Social and political characteristics of riot cities: A comparative study.Social Science Quarterly 49:504–520.Google Scholar
  8. Downes, Brian (1970). A critical reexamination of the social and political characteristics of riot cities.Social Science Quarterly 51:349–360.Google Scholar
  9. Feagin, J. A., and Hahn, Harlan (1973).Ghetto Revolts: The Politics of Violence in American Cities. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  10. Fogelson, R. M., and Hill, R. B. (1968). Who riots: A study of participation in the 1967 riots.Supplementary Studies for the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government.Google Scholar
  11. Ford, W. F., and Moore, J. H. (1970). Additional evidence on the social and political characteristics of riot cities.Social Science Quarterly 51:339–348.Google Scholar
  12. Gerschwender, J. A. (1968a). Civil rights protest and riots: A disappearing distinction.Social Science Quarterly 49:474–483.Google Scholar
  13. Gunning, Patrick (1972). An economic approach to riot analysis.Public Choice 13:31–46.Google Scholar
  14. Kerner, Otto et al. (1968).Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  15. Lieske, Joel A. (1978). The conditions of racial violence in American cities: A developmental synthesis.American Political Science Review 72:1324–1340.Google Scholar
  16. Lupsha, Peter (1969). On theories of urban violence.Urban Affairs Quarterly 4:273–296.Google Scholar
  17. McCone Commission (1965).Violence in the City—An End or a Beginning? Google Scholar
  18. Mason, T. David (1984). Individual participation in collective racial violence: A rational choice synthesis.American Political Science Review 78:1040–1056.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, A. H., Bolce, L., and Halligan, M. R. (1976). The new urban black revisited.Ethnicity 3:338–367.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, A. H., Bolce, L., and Halligan, M. R. (1977). The J-curve theory and black urban riots: An empirical test of progressive relative deprivation theory.American Political Science Review 71:864–882.Google Scholar
  21. Morgan, R. J., and Clarke, T. (1970). The causes of racial disorders: A grievance level explanation.American Sociological Review 38:611–624.Google Scholar
  22. Murtagh, Jerry (1983). The preconditions of public goods discrimination: The effects of metropolitan segregation on riot occurrence. Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Sears, D. O., and McConahey, J. B. (1969). Participation in the Los Angeles riot.Social problems 17:3–20.Google Scholar
  24. Sears, D. O., and McConahey, J. B. (1973).The Politics of Violence: The New Urban Black and the Watts Riot. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  25. Spilerman, Seymour (1970). Causes of racial disturbances: A comparison of alternative explanations.American Sociological Review 35:627–649.Google Scholar
  26. Spilerman, Seymour (1971). The causes of racial disturbances: Tests of an explanation.American Sociological Review 36:427–451.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. David Mason
    • 1
  • Jerry A. Murtagh
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceMississippi State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Fort Valley State CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations