Skip to main content
Log in

Agent credibility and receptivity influences on children's political learning

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the child's perception of primary agents (parent, teacher, and friend) as political references. It differs in emphasis from earlier socialization studies by adopting the perspective of the child and asking how and why the child regards these agents as authorities. Using two studies (an original and a replication performed a year later with a separate sample), we demonstrate that fifth- and sixth-grade children exhibit two evaluative dimensions, credibility and receptivity. They discriminate among the agents using these two dimensions, and this discrimination is specific to the type of issue. These dimensions affect successful attitude transmission from agent to child: increasing agent credibility and receptivity factors increase opinion congruence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, Kenneth D. (1982).Methods of Social Research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Paul Allen (1977). The role of agents in political socialization. In Stanley Allen Renshon (ed.),Handbook of Political Socialization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, C. V. (1963). Adolescent choices and parent-peer pressures.American Sociological Review 28: 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, Steven H., McLeod, Jack M., and Wackman, Daniel B. (1973). Family communication patterns and adolescent political participation. In Jack Dennis (ed.),Socialization to Politics, pp. 349–364. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1971).The Child's Construction of Politics. Australia: Melbourne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, Richard E., Prewitt, Kenneth, and Dawson, Karen (1977).Political Socialization (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, Jack (1968). Major problems of political socialization research.Midwest Journal of Political Science 12, no. 1: 85–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, Herbert, and Opper, Sylvia (1969).Piaget's Theory of Intellectual Development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Robert D., and Torney, Judith V. (1967).The Development of Political Attitudes in Children. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, Charles A., Collins, Barry E., and Miller, Norman (1969).Attitude Change. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, Richard G. (1974).How Family Members Perceive Each Other. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedin, Kent (1974). The influence of parents on the political attitudes of adolescents.American Political Science Review 68, no. 4 (Dec.): 1579–1592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedin, Kent (1980). Assessing peer and parent influence on adolescent political attitudes.American Journal of Political Science 24, no. 1 (Feb.): 136–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, Robert, and Joslyn, Richard (1977). Methodological appropriateness in political socialization research. In Stanley Allen Renshon (ed.),Handbook of Political Socialization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplements, vol. 9, no. 2, part 2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, C.B., Minns, D.R. Agent credibility and receptivity influences on children's political learning. Polit Behav 8, 175–200 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987182

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987182

Keywords

Navigation