Abstract
Data from the 1980 National Election Study are used to examine how well participation theory variables and group consciousness variables account for the nonvoting political activity of traditional-role women. Of the little variance in this activity that is explained by a regression analysis among these women (.070 after adjustments for number of respondents and variables, compared to .240 among modern-role women), most is due to two participation theory variables: party identification and efficacy. However, a discriminant function analysis emphasizes two group consciousness variables (gender consciousness and religious consciousness) and only one participation theory variable (political ideology) as the main forces that distinguish active traditional-role from active modern-role women. These findings indicate the need to make clear which comparison group — other traditional-role women or politically active modern-role women — is being used in efforts to understand traditional-role women's political conduct. The findings also call for new theoretical directions about traditional-role women's nonvoting participation, because of the weak explanatory ability exhibited by all fourteen variables together.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Andersen, Kristi (1975). Working women and political participation 1952–1972.American Journal of Political Science 79:439–453.
Andersen, Margaret (1981). Corporate wives: longing for liberation or satisfied with the status quo?Urban Life 10:311–327.
Arrington, Theodore S., and Kyle, Patricia A. (1978). Equal Rights Amendment activists in North Carolina.Signs 3:666–679.
Bourke, Susan, and Grossholtz, Jean (1974). Politics as an unnatural practice: political science looks at female participation.Politics and Society 4:255–266.
Brady, David W., and Tedin, Kent L. (1976). Ladies in pink: religion and political ideology in the anti-ERA movement.Social Science Quarterly 56:564–575.
Burris, Val (1983). Who opposed the ERA? An analysis of the social bases of antifeminism.Social Science Quarterly 64:305–317.
Cassell, Carol (1979). Change in electoral participation in the South.Journal of Politics 41:907–917.
Conover, Pamela J., and Gray, Virginia (1983).Feminism and the New Right: Conflict over the American Family. New York: Praeger.
Conway, M. Margaret (1979). Women as voluntary political activists: a review of recent empirical research. In Bernice Cummings and Victoria Schuck (eds.),Women Organizing: An Anthology. New York: Scarecrow Press.
Danigelis, Nicholas L. (1982). Race, class and political involvement in the U.S.Social Forces 61:532–550.
Domhoff, William (1970).The Higher Circles. New York: Random House.
Ehrenreich, Barbara (1981). The women's movements: feminist and anti-feminist.Radical America 15:93–101.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (1974). Moral man and immoral woman: a consideration of the public-private split and political ramifications.Politics and Society 4:453–473.
Fulenwider, Claire K. (1981). Feminist ideology and the political attitudes and participation of white and minority women.Western Political Quarterly 34:17–30.
Hougland, James G., Jr., and Christenson, James A. (1983). Religion and politics: the relationship of religious participation to political efficacy and involvement.Sociology and Social Research 67:405–420.
Huber, Joan, and Spitze, Glenna (1981). Wives' employment, household behaviors, and sex-role attitudes.Social Forces 60:150–169.
Kelly, Rita Mae, and Boutilier, Mary (1978).The Making of Political Women: A Study of Socialization and Role Conflict. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Klecka, William R. (1975). Discriminant analysis. In Norman H. Nie et al. (eds.),Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Madron, Thomas W., Nelson, Hart M., and Yokley, Raytha L. (1974). Religion as a determinant of militancy and political participation among black Americans.American Behavioral Scientist 17:783–796.
Mason, Karen O., and Bumpass, Larry L. (1975). U.S. women's sex-role ideology, 1970.American Journal of Sociology 80:1212–1219.
McGrath, Wilma E., and Soule, John W. (1974). Rocking the cradle or rocking the boat: women at the 1972 Democratic National Convention.Social Science Quarterly 55:141–150.
McPherson, J. J., Welch, Susan, and Clark, Cal (1977). The stability and reliability of political efficacy: using path analysis to test alternative models.American Political Science Review 71:509–521.
Miller, Arthur H., Gurin, Patricia, Gurin, Gerald, and Malanchuck, Oksana (1981). Group consciousness and political participation.American Journal of Political Science 25:404–511.
Miller, Warren E., and the National Election Studies Center for Political Studies (1982).American National Election Study. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Mueller, Carol, and Dimieri, Thomas (1982). The structure of belief systems among contending ERA activists.Social Forces 60:657–675.
Ostrander, Susan A. (1980). Upper-class women: the feminine side of privilege.Qualitative Sociology 3:23–44.
Powell, L. W. (1981). Male and female differentials in elite political participation: an examination of the effects of socio-economic and familial variables.Western Political Quarterly 34:31–45.
Prince-Embury, Sandra, and Deutchman, Iva (1981). Sphere of influence profile as a predictor of political behavior in women.Psychology Review 48:876–878.
Rapp, Rayna (1982). Family and class in contemporary America: notes toward an understanding of ideology. In Barrie Thorne and Marilyn Yalom (eds.),Rethinking the Family, pp. 168–187. New York: Longman.
Sapiro, Virginia (1983).The Political Integration of Women: Roles, Socialization and Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Smith, David H. (1980). General activity model. In David H. Smith, Jacqueline Macaulay, et al. (eds.),Participation in Social and Political Activities, pp. 461–530. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sokoloff, Natalie J. (1980).Between Money and Love: The Dialectics of Women's Home and Market Work. New York: Praeger.
Spitze, Glenna, and Huber, Joan (1980). Changing attitudes towards women's non-family roles.Sociology of Work and Occupations 7:317–335.
Tedin, Kent L., Brady, David W., Buxton, Mary E., Gorman, Barbara M., and Thompson, July L. (1977). Social background and political differences between pro- and anti-ERA activists.American Politics Quarterly 5:395–407.
Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H. (1972).Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., and Kim, Jae-On (1978).Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Volgy, Thomas J., and Volgy, Sandra Sue (1975). Women and politics: political correlates of sex-role acceptance.Social Science Quarterly 55:967–974.
Welch, Susan (1977). Women as political animals? A test of some explanations for male-female political participation differences.American Journal of Political Science 21:711–730.
Wilson, John (1978).Religion in American Society: The Effective Presence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wimberley, Ronald C. (1978). Dimensions of commitment: generalizing from religion to politics.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 17:225–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, D.L., Peek, C.W. Ladies against women: Explaining the political participation of traditional- and modern-role females. Polit Behav 8, 158–174 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987181
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987181
Keywords
- Regression Analysis
- Function Analysis
- Comparison Group
- Discriminant Function
- Political Activity