Skip to main content
Log in

Job-rejection letters as bureaucratic propaganda

  • Articles
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I analyze job-rejection letters received from departments of sociology, as instances of what Altheide and Johnson (1980) call “bureaucratic propaganda.” My purpose is to show that mundane documents can contain portrayals that legitimate the sending organization. In job-rejection letters, departments consistently are portrayed as meeting ideal norms of conduct: their members are rigorous, fair and nurturant, and they employ universalistic criteria. Rejected applicants are consistently portrayed as possessing superior job qualifications. All failures of departments to attain ideal standards are excused by reference to uncontrollable contingencies. I argue that the portrayals are rhetorical, and are independent of departmental action. Their existence in such mundane documents illustrates both the detailed efforts made to legitimate organizations, and the pervasiveness of bureaucratic propaganda in the society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altheide, David L. and John M. Johnson 1980 Bureaucratic Propaganda. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous 1976 “Reflections of an unemployed sociologist.” The American Sociologist 11:193–8.

  • Bittner, Egon 1974 “The concept of organization.” Pp. 69–81 in Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobys, Richard S. and Cecil L. Willis 1980 “‘We regret to inform you ...’: An analysis of job rejection letters.” Sociological Symposium 31:65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, Aaron V. and John I. Kitsuse 1963 The Educational Decision-Makers. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. 1982 The Asymmetric Society. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, Michel 1966 The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, Robert B. 1981 In the Shadow of Organization. Lawrence, KS: Regents Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, Bonnie T., Evelyn N. Glenn and Bettina J. Huber 1983 “Women in departmental administrative positions.” Footnotes 11:10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray 1977 Political Language. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermann, M. David and Richard J. Lundmann (eds.) 1978 Corporate and Governmental Deviance. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, Gary S. and Edward W. Gregory 1983 “Reflections on a changing academic job market.” Footnotes 11:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1952 “On cooling the mark out.” Psychiatry 15:451–63

    Google Scholar 

  • 1961 Asylums. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974 Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, Joseph 1976 “The literary rhetoric of science.” American Sociological Review 41:16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Joan, John Gagnon, Suzanne Keller, Ronald Lawson, Patricia Miller, and William Simon 1982 “Report of the American Sociological Association's task group on homosexuality.” The American sociologist 17:164–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Jerry 1967 “A phenomenological study of suicide notes.” Social Problems 15:60–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehensen, Roger 1973 “A phenomenological approach to the study of the formal organization.” Pp. 219–47 in George Psathas (ed.), Phenomenological Sociology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledger, Marshall and Arnold Roth 1977 “Poems by chairpersons and their agents.” The American Sociologist 12:148–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Alfred McClung 1976 “Sociology for whom?” American Sociological Review 41:925–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littrell, W. Boyd 1973 “Vagueness, social structure and social research in law.” Social Problems 21:38–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyson, Thomas A., and Gregory D. Squires n.d. “Buddy can you spare a job? Rejection in the halls of academe.” Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC

  • 1978 “The new academic hustle: Marketing a Ph.D.” The American Sociologist 13:233–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Peter 1977 Police Work. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, Herbert and James G. Simon 1958 Organizations: New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, Don 1976 The Romance of a Profession. St. Paul, MN: Windflower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Marshall W. and Brian Rowan 1977 “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83:340–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles 1979 Complex Organization (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, Richard 1975 The Cunning of History. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, Charles M. 1974 The Snoopy Festival. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann 1973 The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Marvin B. and Stanford M. Lyman 1968 “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33:46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, Edwin M. 1949 White Collor Crime. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berghe, Pierre 1970 Academic Gamesmanship. New York: Abelard-Schuman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max 1946 From Max Weber. Trans. by Hans Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westin, Alan F. 1981 Whistle-Blowing! New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Paul R. 1982 “Minorities and women in sociology: An update.” Footnotes 10:6–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to Peter Adler for a thoughtful review of an earlier version of this paper. My thanks to Shulamit Reinharz for her detailed criticism and careful editing of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckberg, D.L. Job-rejection letters as bureaucratic propaganda. Qual Sociol 7, 340–352 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987101

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987101

Keywords

Navigation