Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 34–55 | Cite as

Max Weber, critical theory, and the administered world

  • Harvey C. Greisman
  • George Ritzer

Abstract

The sociological perspectives of Max Weber and the “Frankfurt School” have been viewed as polarities in much of the recent literature. The Frankfurt sociologists were advocates of a neo-Marxism that stressed dialectical reasoning and rejected the notion of value-neutrality. Weber adhered to the canons of causal logic and cultivated the ideal of objectivity in social research. Notwithstanding these theoretical and methodological differences, Weber and the advocates of critical theory arrived at surprisingly similar conclusions about the “fate” of the modern world. Weber saw the advent of a bureaucratic “iron cage” which would effectively negate the role of the individual, while the Frankfurt sociologists posited the onset of an “administered world” in which human activity would be smothered in an ever-expanding network of management and control. Given these commonalities, a revision of the standard evaluation of Weber and critical theory is suggested.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. 1965 “Rede being offiziellen Emfang...” in Otto Stammer (ed.), Max Weber und die Soziologie Heute. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
  2. —— 1967 Prisms. Samuel and Shierry Weber (trs.). London: Neville Spearman.Google Scholar
  3. —— 1974 “The stars down to earth.” Telos 40:83.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, Gregory 1970 “Does the world remain disenchanted?” Social Research 37: 153–202.Google Scholar
  5. Buck-Morss, Susan 1977 The Origins of Negative Dialect. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burroughs, William 1966 Naked Lunch. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  7. Der Spiegel 1968 “Gësprach mit Theodor W. Adorno.” (February 26):116–124.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, Jack 1971 American Social Order. New York: The Free press.Google Scholar
  9. Frankfurt Institute for Social Research 1972 Aspects of Sociology—Frankfurt Institute for Social Research. John Viertel (trs.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gerth, Hans and C. Wright Mills 1958 From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Greisman, H.C. 1974 “Marketing the millennium.” Politics and Society 4: 511–524.Google Scholar
  12. —— 1976 “Disenchantment of the world.” British Journal of Sociology 27: 497–506.Google Scholar
  13. Hegel, G.W.F. 1967 The Phenomenology of the Mind. J. B. Baille (trs.). New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  14. Horkheimer, Max 1972 Critical Theory. Matthew J. O'Connell (trs.). New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
  15. Jay, Martin 1975 The Dialectical Imagination. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  16. Kolko, Gabriel 1959 “A critique of Max Weber's philosophy of history.” Ethics 70(1): 21.Google Scholar
  17. Marcuse, Herbert 1964 One-Dimensional Man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  18. —— 1972 “Industrialization and capitalism.” in Otto Stammer (ed.), Max Weber and Sociology Today. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  19. Mayer, J.P. 1974 Max Weber and German Politics. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  20. Mitzman, Arthur 1970 The Iron Cage. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  21. Mommsen, Wolfgang 1965 “Max Weber's political sociology and his philosophy of world history.” International Social Science Journal 17(1): 26.Google Scholar
  22. New York Times June 15, 1968. p. 38Google Scholar
  23. Remmling, Gunter W. 1975 The Sociology of Karl Mannheim. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ritzer, George 1975 “Professionalization, bureaucratization, & rationalization: The views of Max Weber.” Social Forces 53: 627–634.Google Scholar
  25. Roof, Wade Clark 1978 Community and Commitment. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. Scimecca, Joseph 1975 “Paying homage to the father: C. Wright Mills and radical sociology.” Sociological Quarterly 17: 180–196.Google Scholar
  27. Weber, Max 1958 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
  28. —— 1968a Economy and Society. Totowa, New Jersey: Bedminister.Google Scholar
  29. —— 1968b The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Edward Shils and Henry Finch (trs.). New York: The Free press.Google Scholar
  30. -- N.D. “Nation, state and power.” Rodolf Faller (trs.) Unpublished.Google Scholar
  31. Weinstein, Michael and Deena Weinstein 1972 “Blau's dialectical sociology.” Sociological Inquiry 42: 173–189.Google Scholar
  32. White, John Wesley 1970 Re-entry. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harvey C. Greisman
    • 1
  • George Ritzer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyWest Chester State CollegeWest Chester
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of MarylandUSA

Personalised recommendations