Skip to main content

Tactile communication and personality differences


An introspective measure of tactile tendency was developed for college-age students. Personality correlates of high and low tactile tendencies explain some individual differences in the use of tactile communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Anderson, P.A. & Leibowitz, K. The development and nature of the construct touch avoidance.Environmental psychology and nonverbal behavior 1978,3 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berryhill, N. The influence of age, sex, family size, and community size on attitude toward tactile communication. Unpublished master's thesis, Texas Tech University, 1982.

  3. Cattell, R.B., Eber, H.W., & Tatsuoka, M.M.Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). Champaign, III.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clevenger, T. A synthesis of experimental research, in stage fright.Quarterly Journal of Speech 1959,45 134–145.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frank, L.K. Tactile communication.Genetic Psychology Monographs 1957,56 209–255.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Henley, N.Body politics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Tabular Supplement No. 1 to the 16PF Handbook. Champaign: Institute, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jourard, S. An exploratory study of body accessibility.British Journal of Social Clinical Psychology 1966,5 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leibowitz, K., & Anderson, P. The development and nature of the construct touch avoidance. In B.W. Morse & L.A. Phelps (eds.),Interpersonal communication: A Relational Perspective. Minneapolis: Burgess, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCrosky, J.C. Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research.Human Communication Research 1977,4 78–96.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Montague, A.Touching: The Human Significance of the Skin New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morris, D.Intimate Behavior New York: Random House, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nie, N.H.,et al., Statistical Package for the Social Sciences New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Prescott, J.Behavior Today May 15, 1978,9 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scheflen, A.Body Language and the Social Order Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silverman, A.R., Pressman, R., & Bartel, T. Self esteem and tactile communication.Journal of Humanistic Psychology 1973,13 76.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stembridge, D.A.An exploratory study of tactual behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, 1973.

  18. Walker, D.A dyadic interaction model for nonverbal touching behavior in encounter groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1971.

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deethardt, J.F., Hines, D.G. Tactile communication and personality differences. J Nonverbal Behav 8, 143–156 (1983).

Download citation


  • Individual Difference
  • Social Psychology
  • Personality Difference
  • Tactile Communication
  • Introspective Measure