The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences in selected nonverbal behaviors associated with interruptions. Six graduate student groups involving 18 female and 17 male subjects were videotaped. The data for the study were 140 cross-sex interruption sequences and a matched, randomly selected sample of noninterruption sequences. A category system using self-related activity, gestures, body lean, facial expression and eye gaze was developed and used to code the data. There were no significant findings related to interruptions in the categories of self-related activity or gestures. Women leaned away from the group significantly more often than did men and when leaning away, women were more likely to be interrupted. Women were also more likely to be interrupted when smiling than were men, and women smiled significantly more when taking the speaking turn. Finally, women were interrupted significantly more often than men when they did not look at the turn-taker. The high educational status of the subjects was examined in the discussion of the findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Argyle, M., Lalljec, M., & Cook, M. The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad.Human Relations, 1968,21, 3–17.
Cegala, D.J., Alexander, A.F., & Sokuvitz, S. An investigation of eye gaze and its relation to selected verbal behavior.Human Communication Research, 1979,5, 99–107.
Duncan, S. Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972,23, 283–292.
Duncan, S. & Fiske, D.W.Face-to face interaction. New York, LEA Publishers, 1977.
Eakins, B.W. & Eakins, R.G.Sex differences in human communication. Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1978.
Exline, R. Explorations in the process of person perception. Visual interaction in relation to competition, sex, and need for affiliation.Journal of Personality, 1963,13, 1–20.
Exline, R., Gray, D., & Schuette, D. Visual behavior in a dyad as affected by interview content and sex of respondent.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965,1, 201–209.
Goss, B.Processing communication. Belmont, Ca, Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1982.
Harper, R.G., Wiens, A.N., & Matarrazzo, J.D.Nonverbal communication: The state of the Art. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.
Henley, N.Body politics: Power, sex and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1977.
Henley, N. & Freeman, J. The sexual politics of interpersonal behavor. In J. Freeman (Ed.),Women: A feminist perspective. Palo Alto, Ca: Mayfield Publishing Co., 1975.
Ickes, W. & Branes, R. The role of sex and self-monitoring in unstructured dyadic interactions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977,35, 315–330.
Kennedy, C.W. & Camden, C.T. A new look at interruptions.Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1983,47, 45–58.
Kennedy, C.W. & Camden, C.T. Gender differences in interruption behavior: A dominance perspective.International Journal of Women's Studies, 1981,4, 18–25.
Mackey, W.C. Parameters of the smile as a social signal.The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1976,129, 125–130.
Martin, J.N. & Craig, R.T. Selected linguistic sex differences during initial social interactions of same-sex and mixed-sex dyads.Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1983,47, 16–28.
Mehrabian, A. & Friar, J.T. Encoding of attitude by a scaled communicator via posture and position cues.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969,33, 330–336.
Norton, R.W. & Pettegrew, L.S. Attentiveness as a style of communication: A structural analysis.Communication Monographs, 1979,46, 13–26.
Peterson, P. An investigation of sex differences in regard to nonverbal body gestures. In B. Eakins, G. Eakins, & B. Lieb-Brilhart (Eds.),Siscom '75: Women's (and men's) communication. Falls Church Va: SCA, 1976.
Putnam, L.L. & McCallister, L. Situational effects of task and gender on nonverbal display. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention, Acapulco, Mx, 1980.
Rosenfeld, H.M. Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and nonverbal responses in the dyad.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966,4, 597–605.
Rosenfeld, H.M. Conversational control functions of nonverbal behavior. In A. Seigman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Nonverbal behavior and communication. New York: Halstad Press, 1977.
Smith, V.M. & Bass, T.A.Communication for health professionals. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co., 1979.
Zimmerman, D. & West, C. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (Eds.),Language and sex: Difference and dominance, Rowley, Ma: Newbury House, 1975.
About this article
Cite this article
Kennedy, C.W., Camden, C. Interruptions and nonverbal gender differences. J Nonverbal Behav 8, 91–108 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986997
- Gender Difference
- Category System
- Social Psychology
- Facial Expression
- Graduate Student