Micromomentary movement and the deconding of face and body cues
- 64 Downloads
A new version of the Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity Test (PONS)—a standardized test of sensitivity to nonverbal cues—was developed to determine the effects of five levels or sequences of micromomentary movement on accuracy in decoding nonverbal face and body cues, presented for 125 microseconds (msecs). The five sequences were: backward movement, partially backward movement, no movement, partially forward movement, and fully forward movement. Two versions of this test—the Test of Micromomentary Movement Effects (TOMME)—were administered to two samples of female high school and college students. The results, averaged over face and body cues, showed that as the movement sequences more closely approximated the fully forward sequence, decoding accuracy increased. These results, showing the benefits of adding properly sequenced information at split second (42 msec) exposures, not only support the findings of previous researchers that micromomentary facial affect displays may be helpful in decoding nonverbal facial cues, but also suggest that micromomentary movements may be important for decoding body cues as well.
KeywordsHigh School College Student Social Psychology Standardize Test Previous Researcher
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dusenbury, D. & Knower, F. H. Experimental studies of the symbolism of action and voice: 1. A study of the specificity of meaning of facial expression.Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1938,24, 424–436.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. & Friesen, W. V. Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,29, 288–298.Google Scholar
- Frijda, N.H. The understanding of facial expression of emotion.Acta Psychologia, 1953,9, 294–362.Google Scholar
- Haggard, E. A. & Isaacs, K. S. Micromomentary facial expressions as indicators of ego mechanism in psychotherapy. In L. A. Gottschalk & A. H. Auerbach (eds)Methods of research in Psychotherapy. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.Google Scholar
- Izard, C. E.The Face of Emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R. Combining results of independent studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1978,85, 185–193.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R. & DePaulo, B. M. Sex differences in accommodation in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.),Skill in Nonverbal Communication: Individual Differences. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain, 1979. (a)Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R. & DePaulo, B. M. Sex differences in eavesdropping on nonverbal cues.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37, 273–285. (b)Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R., Hall, J.A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D.Sensitivity to Nonverbal Communication: The PONS Test. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.)Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 14). New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar