Skip to main content
Log in

Time demands on families: Is there a bottom line?

  • Published:
Lifestyles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As families continue to adapt to interpersonal and marketplace pressures, time available for household production is becoming scarce. The purpose of the study reported here is to explore the utility of regional economic analyses in determining minimal levels of household production as measured in terms of time. The results provide a minimum family time required in the long term of approximately 35 hours per week and a short term requirement of 2 hours per week. Theoretical frameworks used in family science are integrated in the discussion to explain these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beutler, I., & Owen, A. (1980). A home production model.Home Economics Research Journal, 9, 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E., & Foa, U. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.),Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 77–101). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keniston, K. (1977).All our children: The American family under pressure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, P., & Nock, S. (1987). Time together among dual-earner couples.American Sociological Review, 52, 391–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavee, Y. (1986, November).The use, non-use and mis-use of contemporary family theories in empirical research. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council of Family Relations, Dearborn, MI.

  • Levinger, G., & Huesmann, L. (1980). An “incremental exchange” perspective on the pair relationship: Interpersonal reward and level of involvement. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.),Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 165–196). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovingood, R. (Ed.). (1981).Family time use: An eleven state urban/rural comparison (Bulletin VPI-2). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miernyk, W. (1978).Regional impacts of rising energy prices. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (1980). The measurement and valuation of nonmarket economic activities. In C. Hefferan (Ed.),The household as producer—a look beyond the market (pp. 139–194). Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D., Sprenkle, D., & Russell, C. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications.Family Process, 18, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, G. (1982). The effects of homemakers' employment level and age level of the youngest child on time-use in two-parent, two-child families. In V. Haldeman (Ed.),Proceedings of Western Regional Home Management Family Economics Educators (pp. 96–99). Corvallis: Oregon State University, College of Home Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. (1973).Regional growth theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. (1962).The community economic base study. New York: Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. (1980). Time measurement and the value of nonmarket household production. In C. Hefferan (Ed.),The household as producer—a look beyond the market (pp. 119–138). Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K., & Woods, M. (1976).Time use: A measure of household production of family goods and services. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association, Center for the Family.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand, E. (1954).Use of time by full-time and part-time homemakers in relation to home management (Bulletin 330). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (1929).Use of time by Oregon farm homemakers (Bulletin 256). Corvallis: Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Pamela N. Olson is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Counseling and Family Studies, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131. Her current research interests are family member time-use and families in debt. She completed her Ph.D. at Oregon State University.

James J. Ponzetti, Jr. received his Ph.D. from Oregon State University. He is currently an Assistant Professor in Family Studies in the Department of Home Economics, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA 98926. His current research interests include divorce, loneliness, and family planning.

Geraldine I. Olson is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director, Family Resource Management, College of Home Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97131. She completed her Ph.D. at The Ohio State University and current research interests include family member time-use, assessing managerial activities, and factors which influence the substitution of marketplace goods with household production.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olson, P.N., Ponzetti, J.J. & Olson, G.I. Time demands on families: Is there a bottom line?. J Fam Econ Iss 10, 311–323 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986865

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986865

Key words

Navigation