Abstract
The study of human genetics, now greatly accelerated by the federal Human Genome Project, raises important religious questions about human health, two of which are explored. To the first question—whether to terminate a pregnancy for genetic reasons—it is suggested that a pregnancy with a serious genetic defect may be considered at the same level of moral gravity as pregnancy from rape or incest, thereby permitting termination. To the second question—whether genetic predispositions negate personal responsibility—it is argued that genes affect but do not determine personality and behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Watson, J. D., “The Human Genome Project: Past, Present, and Future,”Science, April 6, 1990, 248, 44–49.
James D. Watson quoted inScience, January 13, 1989, 243, 167.
Plomin, R., “The Role of Inheritance in Behavior,”Science, April 13, 1990,248, 183–188; Bouchard, T. J. Jr.; Lykken, D. T.; McGue, M.,et al., “Sources of Human Psychological Difference: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart,”Science, October 12, 1990, 250, 223–228.
op. cit.; Bouchardet al., op. cit., 227.
Blum, K.; Noble, E. P.; Sheridan, P. J.et al., “Allelic Association of Human Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene in Alcoholism,”JAMA, April 18, 1990, 263, 15, 2055–2060 (at 2059).
Ibid..
Bouchard, C.; Tremblay, A.; Despres, J.-P.et al., “The Response to Long-Term Overfeeding in Identical Twins,”The New England J. Medicine, May 24, 1990, 322, 21, 1447–1482 (at 1481).
Ibid..
Cann, R. L.; Stoneking, M.; and Wilson, A. C., “Mitochondrial DNA and Human Evolution,”Nature, January 1, 1987, 325, 31–36.
Handyside, A. H.; Kontongianni, E. H.; Hardy, K.; and Winston, R. M. L., “Pregnancies from Biopsied Human Preimplantation Embryos Sexed by Y-specific DNA Amplifications,”Nature, April 1990, 344, 768–770.
Quoted in Steinbrook, “In California, Voluntary Mass Prenatal Screening,”Hastings Center Report, October 1986, 16, 7.
Fletcher, J., “Moral Problems in Genetic Counseling,”Pastoral Psychology, April 1972, 23, 52.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Instruction on Respect for Human Life in its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation,”Origins, March 19, 1987, 16, 702.
Genetic Science for Human Benefit. New York, The National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A., 1986, p. 3.
Ibid.
Jones, D. G.,Brave New People: Ethical Issues at the Commencement of Life. Grand Rapids, Michigan, William B. Eerdmans, 1985, p. 154. An opposing view is taken by Camenisch, P. F., “Abortion: For the Fetus's own Sake?”Hastings Center Report, April 1976, 6, 40–41.
The topic of individual variation is not addressed in Fowler, J.,Stages of Faith. San Francisco, Harper & Row, 1981, or in Dykstra, C., and Parks, S., eds.,Faith Development and Fowler. Birmingham, Alabama, Religious Education Press, 1986.
Plomin, R.,Development, Genetics, and Psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author wishes to thank Ian Barbour, Gene Fowler, Olivia White, Ted Peters, Brent Waters, and Russell Willis for many helpful criticisms of an earlier draft of this article. Appreciation is also expressed to Memphis Theological Seminary for granting a study leave during which this article was written.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cole-Turner, R. Religion and the Human Genome. J Relig Health 31, 161–173 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986794
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986794