Skip to main content
Log in

The consequences of family crowding: A theoretical synthesis

  • Published:
Lifestyles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reviews the literature on crowding in non-family and family settings, identifies flaws in past research, presents a model for the study of crowding, and outlines a theory of crowding. Although the focus of this analysis is on crowding within the family, the model and theory are applicable, in principle, to any context in which too many people live in too little space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiello, J., Baum, A., & Gormley, F. (1981). Social determinants of residential crowding stress.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7 643–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiello, J., & Thompson, D. (1980). Personal space, crowding, and spatial behavior in a cultural context. In I. Altman, A. Raporport, & J. Wohlwill (Eds.),Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research: Vol. 4. Environment and culture (pp. 107–178). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare, M. (1979).Residential crowding in urban America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare, M. (1981). The effects of household density on subgroups.American Sociological Review, 46 110–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1976).Urban crowding and its consequences. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., & Cowell, J. (1976). Crowding and health.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 17 204–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., & Edwards, J. (1976). Crowding and family relations.American Sociological Review, 41 308–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., & Johnson, D. (1975). The effect of crowding on child health and development.American Behavioral Scientist, 18 736–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Edwards, J. (1980a). Reply to Gove and Hughes.American Sociological Review, 45 870–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Edwards, J. (1980b). In pursuit of pathology: The effects of human crowding.American Sociological Review, 45 873–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, J. (1962). Population density and social pathology.Scientific American, 206 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Atri, D., & Ostefeld, A. (1975). Crowding: Its effects on blood pressure in a prison setting.Preventive Medicine, 4 550–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, L., Pugh, W., & Eric Gunderson, E. (1978). The behavioral effects of crowding: Definitions and methods.Environment and Behavior, 10 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., & Booth, A. (1977). Crowding and human sexual behavior.Social Forces, 55 791–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., Booth, A., & Edwards, P. (1982). Housing type, stress and family relations.Social Forces, 61 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, A. (1979). Coping with crowding: Television, patterns of activity, and adaptation to high density environments.Sociological Quarterly, 20 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W., & Geerkin, M. (1977). The effect of children and employment on the mental health of married men and women.Social Forces, 56 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W., & Hughes, M. (1980a). The effects of crowding found in the Toronto study: Some methodological and empirical questions.American Sociological Review, 45 864–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W., & Hughes, M. (1980b). In pursuit of preconceptions: A reply to Booth and his colleagues that household crowding is not an important variable.American Sociological Review, 45 878–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W., & Hughes, M. (1983).Overcrowding in the household. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W., Hughes, M., & Galle, O. (1979). Overcrowding in the home: An empirical investigation of its possible pathological consequences.American Sociological Review, 44 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, G. (1972). The effect of ambient temperature and population density on agression in two inbred strains of mice.Behaviour, 42 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormley, F., & Aiello, J. (1982). Social density, interpersonal relationships, and residential crowding stress.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12 222–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. (1966).The hidden dimension. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heminway, D., & Furumoto, L. (1972). Population density and alcohol consumption in the rat.Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 33 794–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, L. (1980). Overcrowding and inmate behavior.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 7 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langner, T. (1962). A twenty-two item screening score of psychiatric symptoms indicating impairment.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 3 269–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magargec, E. (1976). Population density and disruptive behavior in a prison setting. In A. Cohen, G. Cole, & R. Bailey (Eds.),Prison violence (pp. 188–233). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E., (1977). Mobility, fertility and residential crowding.Sociology and Social Research, 61 363–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E., & Winter, M. (1978).Housing, family, and society. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacci, P., Teitelbaum, H., & Prather, J. (1977). Population density and inmate misconduct rates in the federal prison system.Federal Probation, 41(2), 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. (1980). Crowding. In P. Paulus (Ed.),The psychology of group influence (pp. 245–289). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19 2–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohe, W. (1981). The response to density in residential settings: The mediating effects of social and personal variables.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12 292–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981).Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording and context. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. (1986). Toward a unified theory of ethnic antagonism.Sociological Forum, 1 403–427.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Leonard Beeghley is Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. He received his Ph.D. from the University of California at Riverside. His research interest focuses on issues in stratification and theory development. The research reported here is the initial stage of an attempt at understanding the effect of crowding on families.

Denise Donnelly is a Ph.D. candidate, Department of Sociology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. Her current area of interest focuses on cross-cultural perspectives on women's status.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beeghley, L., Donnelly, D. The consequences of family crowding: A theoretical synthesis. J Fam Econ Iss 10, 83–102 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986693

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986693

Key words

Navigation