Skip to main content
Log in

Concluding remarks

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On the basis of symposium contributions onChlorella, Hibbertia, Eucalyptus, Ambrosia and on numerical approaches some fundamental problems of (bio)systematics, evolution, and taxonomic categories are discussed: Methods available for analysing “affinities”; conflicting evidence from phenetic, biochemical, cytogenetic and other analyses; further classification problems in cases of “intermediacy”, etc. While “sibs” of various levels and their “natural” hierarchy often can be objectively defined, this appears impossible for particular taxonomic levels itself (e. g. “species”). A single objective taxonomic system of organisms is unrealistic. Certain guiding lines for relative and practicable concepts of “species” and “genus” are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blair, W. F., andTurner, B. L., 1972: The integrative approach to biological classification. InBehnke, J. A. (Ed.): Challenging Biological Problems, Directions toward their Solution. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, W., andLewis, H., 1972: Interchanges and interpopulational gene exchange inClarkia speciosa. Chromosomes today3, 268–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrov, E. G., 1972: Principal features in the development of plant systematics and nomenclature. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. (Praha)7, 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, W. C., 1975: The species concept inQuercus. Taxon24, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, B. L., 1970: Infraspecific categories in flowering plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.2, 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, W. D., 1972: Some aspects of the genus concept. Kew. Bull.27, 281–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crovello, Th. J., 1976: Numerical approaches to the species problem. Plant Syst. Evol.125, 179–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesch, O. und E.,Ehrendorfer, F. und K., 1975: Hybriden und hybridogene Sippen ausOphrys bertolonii undO. atrata (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst. Evol.124, 79–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. H., andHeywood, V. H., 1963: Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. Edinburgh-London: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F. (Ed.), 1973: Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Stuttgart: Fischer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gölz, P., undReinhard, H. R., 1975: Biostatistische Untersuchungen überOphrys bertoloniiformis O. etE. Danesch. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.85, 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1971: Plant Speciation. New York-London: Columbia Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. C., andCrovello, Th. J., 1971: A comparison of numerical and biosystematic studies inHaplopappus. Brittonia23, 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., 1966: Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. H., 1974: Systematics—the stone of Sisyphus. Biol. J. Linn.6, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. A. S., 1976: Problems of species and genera inEucalyptus (Myrtaceae). Plant Syst. Evol.125, 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E., 1976: Comparative physiology, biochemistry, and the taxonomy ofChlorella (Chlorophyceae). Plant Syst. Evol.125, 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., 1971: Circumscribing the concept of the genus. Taxon20, 137–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1972: The definition of systematic categories in biology. Taxon21, 381–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merxmüller, H., 1972: Systematic botany—an unachieved synthesis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.4, 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, W. W., 1976: Biochemistry and species problems inAmbrosia (Asteraceae-Ambrosieae). Plant Syst. Evol.125, 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A. E., Dickison, W. C., Massey, J. R., andBell, C. R., 1974: Vascular Plant Systematics. New York-London: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. J., 1973: A consideration of the category in classification. Taxon22, 405–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A., andSokal, R. R., 1973: Numerical Taxonomy. The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Cie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., andHoogland, R. D., 1976: Species diversity, ecology, and evolution in a primitive Angiosperm genus:Hibbertia (Dilleniaceae). Plant Syst. Evol.125, 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. H., 1969: The construction of a classification. In Systematic Biology, 67–90. Washington, D. C.: Natl. Acad. Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ehrendorfer, F. Concluding remarks. Pl Syst Evol 125, 189–194 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986151

Key words

Navigation