Abstract
On the basis of symposium contributions onChlorella, Hibbertia, Eucalyptus, Ambrosia and on numerical approaches some fundamental problems of (bio)systematics, evolution, and taxonomic categories are discussed: Methods available for analysing “affinities”; conflicting evidence from phenetic, biochemical, cytogenetic and other analyses; further classification problems in cases of “intermediacy”, etc. While “sibs” of various levels and their “natural” hierarchy often can be objectively defined, this appears impossible for particular taxonomic levels itself (e. g. “species”). A single objective taxonomic system of organisms is unrealistic. Certain guiding lines for relative and practicable concepts of “species” and “genus” are proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blair, W. F., andTurner, B. L., 1972: The integrative approach to biological classification. InBehnke, J. A. (Ed.): Challenging Biological Problems, Directions toward their Solution. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Bloom, W., andLewis, H., 1972: Interchanges and interpopulational gene exchange inClarkia speciosa. Chromosomes today3, 268–284.
Bobrov, E. G., 1972: Principal features in the development of plant systematics and nomenclature. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. (Praha)7, 321–327.
Burger, W. C., 1975: The species concept inQuercus. Taxon24, 45–50.
Burtt, B. L., 1970: Infraspecific categories in flowering plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.2, 233–238.
Clayton, W. D., 1972: Some aspects of the genus concept. Kew. Bull.27, 281–287.
Crovello, Th. J., 1976: Numerical approaches to the species problem. Plant Syst. Evol.125, 179–187.
Danesch, O. und E.,Ehrendorfer, F. und K., 1975: Hybriden und hybridogene Sippen ausOphrys bertolonii undO. atrata (Orchidaceae). Plant Syst. Evol.124, 79–123.
Davis, P. H., andHeywood, V. H., 1963: Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. Edinburgh-London: Oliver & Boyd.
Ehrendorfer, F. (Ed.), 1973: Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Stuttgart: Fischer-Verlag.
Gölz, P., undReinhard, H. R., 1975: Biostatistische Untersuchungen überOphrys bertoloniiformis O. etE. Danesch. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.85, 31–56.
Grant, V., 1971: Plant Speciation. New York-London: Columbia Univ. Press.
Jackson, R. C., andCrovello, Th. J., 1971: A comparison of numerical and biosystematic studies inHaplopappus. Brittonia23, 54–70.
Hennig, W., 1966: Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press.
Heywood, V. H., 1974: Systematics—the stone of Sisyphus. Biol. J. Linn.6, 169–178.
Johnson, L. A. S., 1976: Problems of species and genera inEucalyptus (Myrtaceae). Plant Syst. Evol.125, 155–167.
Kessler, E., 1976: Comparative physiology, biochemistry, and the taxonomy ofChlorella (Chlorophyceae). Plant Syst. Evol.125, 129–138.
Legendre, P., 1971: Circumscribing the concept of the genus. Taxon20, 137–139.
—, 1972: The definition of systematic categories in biology. Taxon21, 381–406.
Merxmüller, H., 1972: Systematic botany—an unachieved synthesis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc.4, 311–321.
Payne, W. W., 1976: Biochemistry and species problems inAmbrosia (Asteraceae-Ambrosieae). Plant Syst. Evol.125, 169–172.
Radford, A. E., Dickison, W. C., Massey, J. R., andBell, C. R., 1974: Vascular Plant Systematics. New York-London: Harper & Row.
Scott, P. J., 1973: A consideration of the category in classification. Taxon22, 405–406.
Sneath, P. H. A., andSokal, R. R., 1973: Numerical Taxonomy. The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Cie.
Stebbins, G. L., andHoogland, R. D., 1976: Species diversity, ecology, and evolution in a primitive Angiosperm genus:Hibbertia (Dilleniaceae). Plant Syst. Evol.125, 139–154.
Wagner, W. H., 1969: The construction of a classification. In Systematic Biology, 67–90. Washington, D. C.: Natl. Acad. Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ehrendorfer, F. Concluding remarks. Pl Syst Evol 125, 189–194 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986151
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986151