The impact of religion on men's blood pressure

Abstract

Most clinical studies examining the relation between religion and blood pressure status have focused on church attendance, finding lower pressures among frequent attenders. The present study examines the effect on blood pressure status of a religious meaning variable, importance of religion, both by itself and together with frequency of church attendance. The relation between blood pressure, self-perceived importance of religion, and frequency of church attendance was examined among a rural sample of 407 white men free from hypertension or cardiovascular disease. The data confirmed an interaction between the effects of both religious variables on blood pressure status, with importance of religion having an even greater association with lower pressures than church attendance. Diastolic blood pressures of persons with high church attendance and high religious importance were significantly lower than those in the low attendance, low importance group. These differences persisted after adjusting the analyses for age, socioeconomic status, smoking, and weight-height ratio (Quetelet Index). The difference in mean diastolic pressures based on response to the religious importance variable alone was statistically and clinically significant, particularly among men aged 55 and over (6 mm) and among smokers (5 mm). These findings suggest that both religious attitudes and involvement may interact favorably in their effects on cardiovascular hemodynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Jenkins, C.D., “Recent Evidence Supporting Psychological and Social Risk Factors for Coronary Disease,”New England J. Medicine, 1976, 294, 987–994.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Larson, D.B., “Religious Involvement.” In Rekers, G.A., ed,Family Building, ch 6. Ventura, Calif., Regal Books, 1985, pp. 121–148.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Larson, D.B., Pattison, E.M., Blazer, D.B.,et al., “Systematic Analysis of Research of Religious Variables in Four Major Psychiatric Journals, 1978–82,”Amer. J. Psychiatry, 1986. 143, 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Craigie, F.C., Liu, I.Y., and Larson, D.B., “A Systematic Analysis of Religious Variables, 1976–1986,”J. Family Practice, 1988, 27, 509–513.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ibid.., in submission.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kaplan, B.H., “A Note on Religious Belief and Coronary Heart Disease,”J. South Carolina Medical Association, Supplement, February 1976, 60–64.

  7. 7.

    Graham, T.W., “Socioeconomic Status, Church Attendance and Blood Pressure Elevation,” A Master's Thesis presented to the School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1976; Graham, T.W.,et al, “Frequency of Church Attendance and Blood Pressure Elevation,”J. Behavioral Medicine, 1978, 1, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Moberg, D.O., “The Development of Social Indicators of Spiritual Well-Being for Quality of Life Research,” inSpiritual Well-Being: Sociological Perspectives, Molberg, D.O. (Ed.), University Press of America: Washington, DC, 1979, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    James, W.,The Variables of Religious Experience. London, Collier MacMillan Publishers, 1961; Allport, G.,The Individual and His Religion. New York, The MacMillan Company, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., and Rodgers, W.L.,The Quality of American Life. New York, Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    McNamara, P.H., and St. George, A., “Measures of Religiosity and the Quality of Life: A Critical Analysis.” In Mober, D.O., ed.,Spiritual Well-Being: Sociological Perspectives. Washington, D.C., University Press of America, 1979, pp. 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., and Rodgers, W.L.,The Quality of American Life, op. cit..

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tyroler, H.A., “Hypertension.” In Last, J.M., ed.,Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 11th Edition. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1980; Stamler, J.,et al., The Epidemiology of Hypertension. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Syme, S.L.,et al., “Social Class and Racial Differences in Blood Pressure,”Amer J. Public Health, 197464, 619–630.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    James, S.A., and Kleinbaum, D.G., “Socioecologic Stress and Hypertension Related Mortality Rates in North Carolina,”Amer. J. Public Health, 1976, 66, 354–358.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chiang, B.W., Perlman, L.V., and Epstein, F.H., “Overweight and Hypertension: A Review,”Circulation, 1969, 39, 403–421; Tyroler, H., Heyden, S., and Hames, C., “Weight and Hypertension: Evans County Studies of Blacks and Whites.” In Oglesby, P., ed.,Epidemiology and Control of Hypertension. New York, Stratton Intercontinental Medical Book Association 1975, pp. 177–204.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Greene, S.B.,et al., “Smoking Habits and Blood Pressure Change: A Seven Year Follow-Up,”J. Chronic Diseases, 1977, 30, 401–413.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Princeton Religion Research Center.Religion in America. Princeton, N.J., The Gallup Poll, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cassel, J.C., “Summary of Major Findings of the Evans County Cardiovascular Studies,”Archives of Internal Medicine, 1971, 128, 887–889; “Review of 1960 Through 1962 Cardiovascular Disease Prevalence Study,”Archives of Internal Medicine, 1971, 128, 890–895.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ibid, p. 893.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tyroler, H.A.,et al., “Blood Pressure and Cholesterol as Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors,”Archives of Internal Medicine, 1971, 128, 907–914.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kaplan, B.H.,et al., “Occupational Mobility and Coronary Heart Disease,”Archives of Internal Medicine, 1971, 128, 938–942.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    McGuire, C., and White, G.D., “The Measurement of Social Status,” Research Paper in Human Development, No. 3 (Revised), Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas.

  24. 24.

    Tyroler, H., Heyden, S., and Harnes, C., “Weight and Hypertension: Evans County Studies of Blacks and Whites,”op. cit., p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Statistical Analysis Systems, 1979 Edition, Cary, N.C.

  26. 26.

    Kleinbaum, D.G., and Kupper, L. L.,Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. N. Scituate, Mass., Duxbury Press, 1978; Neter, J., and Wasserman, W.Applied Linear Statistical Models. Homewood, Illinois, Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ibid..

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nuckolls K., Cassel J. C., and Kaplan B.H., “Psychosocial Assets, Life Crises and the Prognosis of Pregnancy,”Amer. J. Epidemiology, 1972, 95, 431–441; Berkman, L. and Syme, S.L., “Social Networks, Host Resistance and Mortality”,Amer. J. Epidemiology, 1979, 109, 186–204.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Berkman, L., and Syme, S.L., “Social Networks, Host Resistance and Mortality,”op. cit., pp. 186–204.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Weiner, H.,The Psychobiology of Hypertension. New York, Elsevier, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jacob, R.G., Kramer, H.C., and Agras, W.S., “Relaxation Therapy in the Treatment of Hypertension,”Archives of General Psychiatry, 1977, 34, 1417–1427; Blanchard, E.B., and Miller, S.T., “Psychological Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease,”Archives of General Psychiatry, 1977, 34, 1402–1416.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Brody, D.S., “Psychological Distress and Hypertension Control,”J. Human Stress, March 1980, 2–6.

  33. 33.

    Harburg, E.,et al., “Socioecological Stressor Areas and Black-White Blood Pressure, Detroit,”J. Chronic Disease, 1973, 26, 596–611.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    James, S.A., and Kleinbaum, D.G., “Socioecologic Stress and Hypertension Related Mortality Rates in North Carolina.”op. cit., pp. 354–358.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Taylor, C.B., and Fortman, S.P., “Psychosomatic Illness Review: Hypertension,”Psychosomatics, 1983, 24, 433–448; Harburg, E., Blakelock, E.H., and Roeper, P.J., “Resentful and Reflective Coping with Arbitrary Authority and Blood Pressure, Detroit,”Psychosomatic Medicine, 1979, 41, 189–202; Sapira, J.D., Scheib, E.T.,et al, “Differences in Perception Between Hypertensive and Normotensive Populations,”Psychosomatic Medicine, 1971, 33, 239–250; Pilowksi, I.,et al., “Hypertension and Personality,”Psychosomatic Medicine, 1973, 35, 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Linden W., and Feuerstein, M., “Essential Hypertension and Social Coping Behavior,”J. Human Stress, March 1981, 28–34; Harburg, E., Blakelock, E.H., and Roeper, P.J., “Resentful and Reflective Coping with Arbitrary Authority and Blood Pressure,”op. cit., pp. 189–202.

  37. 37.

    Koenig, H.G., George, L.K., and Siegler, I.C., “The Use of Religion and Other Emotion-Regulating Coping Strategies Among Older Adults,”The Gerontologist, 1988, 28, 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Koenig, H.G., Kvale, J.N., and Ferrel, C., “Religion and Well-Being in Later Life,”The Gerontologist, 1988, 28, 18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Koenig, H.G., Smiley, M., and Gonzales, J.,Religion, Health, and Aging. Westport, Conn., Greenwood Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Koenig, H.G., Moberg, D.O., and Kvale, J.N., “Religious Activities and Attitudes of Older Adults in a Geriatric Assessment Clinic,”J. Amer. Geriatric Society, 1988, 36, 362–374.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Larson, D.B., “Religious Involvement,”op. cit.In, pp. 121–148.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Rose, G., “Strategy of Prevention: Lessons From Cardiovascular Disease,”British Medical J., 1981, 282, 1847–1855.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Marmot, M.G., “Diet, Hypertension, and Stroke.” In Turner, M.R., ed.,Nutrition and Health. New York, Alan R. Liss, 1982, p. 243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Funding for this study was provided by the Department of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; the Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center; and the Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

The authors thank Dan Blazer for his advice, assistance, and encouragement. They are also grateful to Dana Anne Mlekush for her help with manuscript preparation and her thoughtful input to this project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larson, D.B., Koenig, H.G., Kaplan, B.H. et al. The impact of religion on men's blood pressure. J Relig Health 28, 265–278 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986065

Download citation

Keywords

  • Church Attendance
  • Importance Variable
  • Religious Variable
  • Meaning Variable
  • Rural Sample