Skip to main content
Log in

Vergleichende Mikromorphologie der Narbenoberflächen bei den Angiospermen; Zusammenhänge mit Pollenoberflächen bei heterostylen Sippen

Comparative micromorphology of stigma surfaces in angiosperms; relations to pollen grain surfaces in heterostylous taxa

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stigmatic surfaces of about 250 species from more than 100 families were examined by scanning electron microscopy. There are five main groups which differ by the amount of secretion, the morphology of the surface and the distribution of receptive cells. The types of stigmatic surfaces are often remarkably constant on the family level.Ericaceae andLiliaceae are examples for very heterogenous families. Particular interest was paid to heteromorphic (heterostylous and cleistogamous) species. In most heterostylous species there is a close morphological correlation between the stigmatic surface and the sculpture of compatible pollen. Heterostyly was established for the genusGoniolimon. The dimorphism of plants with chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers is a phenomenon which is not comparable to the polymorphism of heterostylous forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Baker, H. G., 1948: Dimorphism and monomorphism in thePlumbaginaceae. I. A survey of the family. — Ann. Bot.12, 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1954: Dimorphism and incompatibility in thePlumbaginaceae. — 8ème Congr. Bot., Paris, Rapp. et Comm., Sect.10, 133–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1966: The evolution, functioning and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. I. ThePlumbaginaceae. — Evolution20, 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, N., 1913: Preliminary note on heterostylism inOxalis andLythrum. — J. Genetics3, 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. C. H., 1979: The evolutionary breakdown of tristyly inEichhornia crassipes (Mart.)Solms (Water hyacinth). — Evolution33, 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthlott, W., Ehler, N., 1977: Raster-Elektronenmikroskopie der Epidermis-Oberflächen von Spermatophyten. — Trop. Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt (Akad. Wiss. Lit. Mainz)19, 1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J., 1954: The diversity of incompatibility systems in flowering plants. — 8ème Congr. Bot., Paris, Rapp. et Comm., Section10, 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A. W., 1873: On the floral structure ofImpatiens fulva Nutt., with special reference to the imperfect self-fertilized flowers. — J. Linn. Soc. Bot.13 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer, H., 1927: Beiträge zum Heterostylie-Problem beiLythrum salicaria. — Flora122, 306–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokhari, M. H., 1972: A brief review of stigma and pollen types inAcantholimon andLimonium. — Notes R. Bot. Gard. Edinb.32, 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capus, M. G., 1879: Du tissu conducteur. — Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot.7, 209–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, D., 1979: The evolution and breakdown of tristyly. — Evolution33, 486–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. L., Marlow, D. P., Garner, G. E., 1968: A rapid critical point method using fluorcarbons (“freons”) as intermediate and transitional fluids. — J. Microscopie (France)7, 331–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden, R. W., Miller-Ward, Sh., 1981: Pollen-ovule ratio, pollen size, and the ratio of stigmatic area to the pollen bearing area of the pollinator: an hypothesis. — Evolution35, 964–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Ch., 1864: On the existence of two forms, and on their reciprocal sexual relation, in several species of the genusLinum. — J. Proc. Linn. Soc. London (Bot.)7, 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1877: Die verschiedenen Blütenformen an Pflanzen der nämlichen Art. (Aus dem Englischen übersetzt von J. Victor Carus.) — Stuttgart.

  • Dulberger, R., 1974: Structural dimorphism of stigmatic papillae in distylousLinum species. — Am. J. Bot.61, 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, C., 1978: Stigmates sécréteurs et lipides neutres sécrétés. — Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr.125, 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erben, M., 1978: Die GattungLimonium in südwestmediterranen Raum. — Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München14, 361–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G., 1966: Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy. — London, New York: Hafner Publ. Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1969: Handbook of Palynology. — Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst-Schwarzenbach, M., 1956: Kleistogamie und Antherenbau in der Hydrocharitaceen-GattungOttelia. — Phytomorphology6, 296–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersterberger, P. [sic!],Leins, P., 1978: Rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Blütenknospen vonPhysalis philadelphica (Solanaceae). Anwendung einer neuen Präparationsmethode. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.91, 381–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, K., 1933: Organographie der Pflanzen3. 3. Auflage. — Jena.

  • Hanson, C. H., 1943: Cleistogamy and the development of the embryo sac inLespedeza stipulacea. — Agr. Res.67, 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J., Heslop-Harrison, Y., 1981: The pollen-stigma interaction in the grasses. 2. Pollen-tube penetration and the stigma response inSecale. — Acta Bot. Neerl.30, 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, Y., 1970: Scanning electron microscopy of fresh leaves ofPinguicula. — Science167, 172–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Stigma characteristics and angiosperm taxonomy. — Nord. J. Bot.1, 401–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Shivanna, K. R., 1977: The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. — Ann. Bot.41, 1233–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, F., 1867: Über den Trimorphismus in der GattungOxalis. — Monatsber. Pr. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 352–374.

  • Iversen, J., 1940: Blütenbiologische Studien. I. Dimorphie und Monomorphie beiArmeria. — Biol. Medd.15, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Ch. W., Erikson, H. T., Janick, J., 1979: Cleistogamy inSalpiglottis sinuata. — Am. J. Bot.66, 626–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linskens, H. F., 1974: Fertilization in Higher Plants. — Amsterdam: North Holland, Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, E., 1979: The development of cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers inLamium amplexicaule (Labiatae): An example of heteroblastic inflorescence development. — Bot. Gaz.140, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madge, M. A., 1929: Spermatogenesis and fertilization in the cleistogamous flower ofViola odorata var.praecox hort. — Ann. Bot.43, 545–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Leod, J., 1887: Untersuchungen über die Befruchtung der Blumen. — Bot. Zentralbl.29, 150–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, J., Crompton, C. W., 1978: Pollen dimorphism inSilene alba (Caryophyllaceae). — Can. J. Bot.56, 1280–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff, R., 1979: The morphological nature of distyly inLythrum sectionEuhyssopifolia. — Bull. Torrey Bot. Club106, 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, S. J., Kimmins, F. M., 1981: Stigma morphology inCommelinaceae. — Ann. Bot.47, 771–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plitman, U., Levin, D. A., 1983: Pollen-pistil relationships in thePolemoniaceae. — Evolution37, 957–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. M., 1979: Distyly and pollen dimorphism inLinum suffruticosum (Linaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.131, 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouleau, E., 1970: Guide to index Kewensis and its supplements i–xiv. — Montreal: Bibl. Nationale du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoch-Bodmer, H., 1936: Zur Methode der Größenbestimmung von Pollenkörnern, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung vonCorylus avellana. — Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges.45, 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgley, K. R., Scholefield, P. B., 1980: Stigma secretion in the water melon before and after pollination. — Bot. Gaz.141, 428–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivanna, K. R., Sastri, D. C., 1981: Stigma-surface esterase-activity and stigma receptivity in some taxa characterized by wet stigmas. — Ann. Bot.47, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Heslop-Harrison, J., Heslop-Harrison, Y., 1981: Heterostyly inPrimula: 2. Sites of pollen inhibition, and effects of pistil constituents on compatible and incompatible pollen tube growth. — Protoplasma107, 319–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staedtler, G., 1923: Über Reduktionserscheinungen im Bau der Antherenwand von Angiospermen-Blüten. — Flora116, 85–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, R. G., Linskens, H. F., 1974: Pollen. Biology, Biochemistry, Management. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka, H., 1964: Palynologia Madagassica et Mascarenica. — Pollen et Spores4, 239–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1975: Pollen- und Sporenkunde. — Stuttgart: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, J. A., 1942: Life history ofSpecularia perfoliata in reference to cleistogamy. — Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci.45, 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphof, J. C. T., 1938: Cleistogamic Flowers. — Bot. Rev.4, 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier, B. S., 1967: The origin and evolutionary development of heterostyly in the angiosperms. — Evolution21, 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F., 1981: Morphologie der Blüten und Blütenstände. — Stuttgart: Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, St. G., Ornduff, R., 1977: Cryptic self-incompatibility inAmsinckia grandiflora. — Evolution31, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, G., 1930: Cleistogamy inViola riviniana with special reference to its cytological aspects. — Ann. Bot.44, 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schill, R., Baumm, A. & Wolter, M. Vergleichende Mikromorphologie der Narbenoberflächen bei den Angiospermen; Zusammenhänge mit Pollenoberflächen bei heterostylen Sippen. Pl Syst Evol 148, 185–214 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985924

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985924

Key words

Navigation