Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 152, Issue 1–2, pp 101–121 | Cite as

Sieve element characters and the systematic position ofAustrobaileya, Austrobaileyaceae—with comments to the distinction and definition of sieve cells and sieve-tube members

  • H. -Dietmar Behnke
Article

Abstract

The ultrastructure of the sieve elements ofAustrobaileya is compared with that of angiosperm sieve tubes and gymnosperm sieve cells (mostly fromCycadales). Except for the size of the sieve poresAustrobaileya shares all ultrastructural characters (e.g., chromatolytic nuclear degeneration, presence of p-protein, formation of sieve pores from unbranched plasmodesmata) and other features (e.g., companion cells) with angiosperm sieve tubes. Gymnosperm sieve cells on the contrary are characterized by pycnotic nuclear degeneration, absence of p-protein, formation of sieve areas from branched plasmodesmata with median cavities. — The exact ordinal assignment ofAustrobaileya within the subclassMagnoliidae is still disputed, a placement close to eitherMyristicaceae andWinteraceae orMonimiaceae being possible as judged from both S-type sieve-element plastids and p-protein bodies. — On the basis of the ultrastructural results fromAustrobaileya it is proposed to reconsider concepts and terminology of sieve elements. i.e., to include features from sieve pore development, nuclei degeneration and presence of specific proteins into the definitions and to restrict the term sieve cell to gymnospermous sieve elements which differ much from those of other vascular plants.

Key words

Angiosperms Gymnosperms Cycadales Austrobaileyaceae Austrobaileya Sieve cells sieve tubes ultrastructure of sieve pores p-protein sieve-element terminology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, I. W., Swamy, B. G. L., 1949: The morphology and relationships ofAustrobaileya. — J. Arnold Arbor.30, 211–226.Google Scholar
  2. Behnke, H.-D., 1965: Über das Phloem der Dioscoreaceen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Phloembecken. I & II. — Z. Pflanzenphysiol.53, 97–125 & 214–244.Google Scholar
  3. —, 1975a: Phloem tissue and sieve elements in algae, mosses and ferns. InAronoff, S. & al. (Eds.): Phloem Transport, 187–210. — New York, London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  4. —, 1975b: P-type sieve-element plastids: A correlative ultrastructural and ultrahistochemical study on the diversity and uniformity of a new reliable character in seed plant systematics. — Protoplasma83, 91–101.Google Scholar
  5. —, 1981: Sieve-element characters. — Nordic J. Bot.1, 381–400.Google Scholar
  6. —, 1982: Sieve-element plastids, exine sculpturing and the systematic affinities of theBuxaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.139, 257–266.Google Scholar
  7. —, 1983: Cytology and Morphogenesis of Higher Plant Cells—Phloem. — Progress in Bot.45, 18–35.Google Scholar
  8. - 1984: Siebelement-Plastiden und Phloem-Proteine bei ausgewählten Familien derMagnoliidae. — Mitteilungsband der Botaniker-Tagung Wien, S. 96.Google Scholar
  9. —, 1983: Ultrastructure and differentiation of sieve elements in primitive angiosperms. I.Winteraceae. — Protoplasma118, 148–156.Google Scholar
  10. Cheadle, V. I., Whitford, N. B., 1941: Observations on the phloem in theMonocotyledoneae. I. The occurrence and phylogenetic specialization in structure of the sieve tubes in the metaphloem. — Amer. J. Bot.28, 623–627.Google Scholar
  11. Croizat, L., 1940: Notes on theDilleniaceae and their allies:Austrobaileyeae subfam. nov. — J. Arnold Arbor.21, 397–404.Google Scholar
  12. —, 1943: New families. — Cact. & Succ. J. (Los Angeles)15, 64.Google Scholar
  13. Cronquist, A., 1981: An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. — New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlgren, R. M. T., 1980: A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.80, 91–124.Google Scholar
  15. Dute, R. R., Evert, R. F., 1978: Sieve-element ontogeny in the aerial shoot ofEquisetum hyemale L. — Ann. Bot.42, 23–32.Google Scholar
  16. Eames, A. J., McDaniels, L. H., 1947: An Introduction to Plant Anatomy. — New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Ehrendorfer, F., 1983:Angiospermae. — InDenffer, D. v., Ziegler, H., Ehrendorfer, F., Bresinsky, A.: Strassburgers Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen. 32. Aufl., 796–912. — Stuttgart: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  18. Endress, P., 1980: The reproductive characters and systematic position of theAustrobaileyaceae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.101, 393–433.Google Scholar
  19. —, 1983a: The early floral development ofAustrobaileya. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.103, 481–497.Google Scholar
  20. —, 1983b: Dispersal and distribution in some small archaic relic angiosperm families (Austrobaileyaceae, Eupomatiaceae, Himantandraceae, Idiospermoideae-Calycanthaceae). — Sonderbd. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg7, 201–217.Google Scholar
  21. —, 1980: The pollen of theAustrobaileyaceae and its phylogenetic significance. — Grana19, 177–182.Google Scholar
  22. Esau, K., 1969: The Phloem. — InZimmermann, W., Ozenda, P., Wulff, H. D., (Eds.): Encyclopedia of Plant Anatomy, Vol.5, 2, 1–505. — Berlin, Stuttgart: Bornträger.Google Scholar
  23. —, 1979: Phloem. — InMetcalfe, C. R., Chalk, L., (Eds.): Anatomy of the Dicotyledons1, ed. 2, 181–189. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. —, 1979: A crystalline inclusion in sieve element nuclei ofAmsinckia. I & II. — J. Cell Science38, 1–10 & 11–22.Google Scholar
  25. —, 1982: Nuclear crystalloids in sieve elements of species ofEchium (Boraginaceae). — J. Cell Science54, 149–160.Google Scholar
  26. Evert, R. F., 1984: Comparative structure of phloem. — InWhite, R. A., Dickison, D. C., (Eds.): Contemporary Problems in Plant Anatomy. — New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. —, 1971: Lateral sieve-area pores in woody dicotyledons. — Canad. J. Bot.49, 1509–1515.Google Scholar
  28. —, 1974: Sieve-element ultrastructure inPlatycerium bifurcatum and some other polypodiaceous ferns: The nucleus. — Planta119, 301–318.Google Scholar
  29. Haberlandt, G., 1886: Beiträge zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Laubmoose. — Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.17, 359–398.Google Scholar
  30. Hartig, T., 1837: Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Organisation des Stammes der einheimischen Waldbäume. — Jahresb. Fortschr. Forstw. u. Forstl. Naturk.1, 125–168.Google Scholar
  31. Hébant, C., 1977: The Conducting Tissues of Bryophytes. — Vaduz: Cramer.Google Scholar
  32. Huber, B., Graf, E., 1955: Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Geleitzellen der Siebröhren. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.68, 303–310.Google Scholar
  33. Kollmann, R., 1973: Cytologie des Phloems. — InHirsch, G. C., Ruska, H., Sitte, P., (Eds.): Grundlagen der Cytologie, 480–504. — Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  34. Kruatrachue, M., Evert, R. F., 1974: Structure and development of sieve elements in the leaf ofIsoëtes muricata. — Amer. J. Bot.61, 253–266.Google Scholar
  35. Lamoureux, C. H., 1961: Comparative Studies on Phloem of Vascular Cryptogams. — Ph.D. Diss. Univ. of California, Davis (cited afterEsau 1969).Google Scholar
  36. Metcalfe, C. R., Chalk, L., 1950: Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  37. —, 1979: Anatomy of the Dicotyledons1, ed. 2. — Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Parthasarathy, M. V., 1975: Sieve element structure. — InZimmermann, M. H., Milburn, J. A., (Eds.): Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, n. s.1, 198–222. — Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Srivastava, L. M., 1970: The secondary phloem ofAustrobaileya scandens. — Canad. J. Bot.48, 341–359.Google Scholar
  40. Takhtajan, A., 1980: Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). — Bot. Rev.46, 225–239.Google Scholar
  41. Thorne, R. F., 1981: Phytochemistry and angiosperm phylogeny: a summary statement. — InYoung, D. A., Seigler, D. S., (Eds.): Phytochemistry and Angiosperm Phylogeny, 233–295. — New York: Praeger Scientific.Google Scholar
  42. Warmbrodt, R. D., 1980: Characteristics of structure and differentiation in the sieve element of lower vascular plants. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.93, 13–28.Google Scholar
  43. White, C. T., 1933: Ligneous plants collected for the Arnold Arboretum in North Queensland byS. F. Kajewski in 1929. — Contr. Arnold Arbor.4, 1–113.Google Scholar
  44. —, 1948: A new species ofAustrobaileya (Austrobaileyaceae) from Australia. — J. Arnold Arbor.29, 255–256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. -Dietmar Behnke
    • 1
  1. 1.Zellenlehre der UniversitätHeidelbergFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations