Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reproductive structures and phylogenetic significance of extant primitive Angiosperms

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A brief survey is presented on fossil reproductive structures of early Angiosperms from the Lower and mid-Cretaceous and at the same time on the reproductive structures of those extant Angiosperms which resemble most closely these fossils and which seem to be especially primitive also on other grounds: a first group (Degeneriaceae, Himantandraceae, Eupomatiaceae, Austrobaileyaceae) possessing relatively complicated and conspicuous flowers with elaborated inner staminodes, a second group (Chloranthaceae, Trimeniaceae, Amborellaceae) possessing small and relatively simple, inconspicuous flowers with peculiar features in the carpels, and a third group (Winteraceae) possessing flowers with unusual variability in organ number and size. The three groups exhibit a certain diversity in pollination biology, although cantharophily seems to prevail, however different the cantharophily character syndromes may be between the groups. In the extant primitiveMagnoliidae variability occurs on other morphological levels than in the higher advanced Angiosperms. This has to be taken into consideration in evaluations of the systematic relationships of the various groups of theMagnoliidae. Presumably often their relationships are closer than it may appear at first sight. This is also true for the three groups here discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bailey, I. W., Nast, C. G., 1943: Comparative morphology ofWinteraceae. I. Pollen and stamens. — J Arnold Arbor.24, 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basinger, J. F., Dilcher, D. L., 1984: Ancient bisexual flowers. — Science224, 511–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, W., 1982:Chloranthaceae are related to thePiperales, an ancient dicotyledonous alliance. — Bot. Soc. Amer., Abstr. 87.

  • Carlquist, S., 1983: Wood anatomy ofBelliolum (Winteraceae) and a note on flowering. — J. Arnold Arbor.64, 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, S. G. M., Carr, D. J., 1961: The functional significance of syncarpy. — Phytomorphology11, 249–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornet, B., 1979: Recognition of pre-Cretaceous angiosperm pollen and its relationship to fossil polyplicate pollen. — Amer. Assoc. Stratigraph. Palynol.,12th Annual Meeting, Abstr. 7–9.

  • Crepet, W. L., 1983: The role of insect pollination in the origin of the angiosperms. — InReal, L., (Ed.): Pollination Biology, 29–50. — New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, A. O., Rowley, J. R., 1965: Pollen ofDegeneria vitiensis. — J. Arnold Arbor.46, 308–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R., 1983: General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. — Nord. J. Bot.3, 119–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Arcy, W. G., Liesner, R. L., 1981:Hedyosmum (Chloranthaceae) in Panama. — Syst. Bot.6, 74–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilcher, D. L., 1974: Approach to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. — Bot. Rev. (Lancaster)40, 1–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Early angiosperm reproduction: An introductory report. — Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.27, 291–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: In pursuit of the first flower. — Nat. Hist.93 (3), 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1985:Archaeanthus: An early angiosperm from the Cenomanian of the western interior of North America. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71, 351–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. A., 1969: Cretaceous angiosperm pollen of the Atlantic coastal plain and its evolutionary significance. — J. Arnold Arbor.50, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. A., 1973: The monocotyledons: Their evolution and comparative biology. V. Fossil evidence on early evolution of the monocotyledons. — Quart. Rev. Biol.48, 399–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978a: Origin of angiosperms. — Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.9, 365–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978b: Potentials and limitations of exine structure in studies of early angiosperm evolution. — Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg30, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1976: Pollen and leaves from the mid-Cretaceous Potomac Group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution. — In:Beck, C. B., (Ed.): Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms, 139–206. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Noncolumellar monosulcate angiosperm pollen from the Lower Cretaceous of Africa. — Bot. Soc. Amer., Misc. Ser.,157, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982:Afropollis, a new genus of early angiosperm pollen, with notes on the Cretaceous palynostratigraphy and paleoenvironments of Northern Gondwana. — Bull. Centres Rech. Explor.-Prod. Elf-Aquitaine6, 39–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F., Krendl, F., Habeler, E., Sauer, W., 1968: Chromosome numbers and evolution in primitive angiosperms. — Taxon17, 337–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1971: Bau der weiblichen Blüten vonHedyosmum mexicanum Cordemoy (Chloranthaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.91, 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1972: Zur vergleichenden Entwicklungsmorphologie, Embryologie und Systematik beiLaurales. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.92, 331–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1978: Blütenontogenese, Blütenabgrenzung und systematische Stellung der perianthlosenHamamelidoideae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.100, 249–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980a: Floral structure and relationships ofHortonia (Monimiaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.133, 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980b: Ontogeny, function and evolution of extreme floral construction inMonimiaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.134, 79–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980c: The reproductive structures and systematic position of theAustrobaileyaceae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.101, 393–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: Syncarpy and alternative modes of escaping disadvantages of apocarpy in primitive angiosperms. — Taxon31, 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: The early floral development ofAustrobaileya. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.103, 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984a: The flowering process in theEupomatiaceae (Magnoliales). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.104, 297–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984b: The role of inner staminodes in the floral display of some relicMagnoliales. — Pl. Syst. Evol.146, 269–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: The pollen of theAustrobaileyaceae and its phylogenetic significance. — Grana19, 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Floral structure and relationships of theTrimeniaceae (Laurales). — J. Arnold Arbor.64, 447–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbar, C., 1983: Zum Karpellbau einiger Magnoliiden. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.104, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Zur Spirale in Magnolien-Blüten. — Beitr. Biol. Pfl.56, 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Zur Sequenz von Blütenorganen bei einigen Magnoliiden. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.103, 433–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, P. E., Semir, J., Diniz da Cruz, N., 1977: Floral biology ofTalauma ovata St. Hil. (Magnoliaceae). — Ci. & Cult.29, 1436–1441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P., 1974: A contribution to the knowledge of cytology inMagnoliales. — J. Arnold Arbor.55, 453–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt, P., Briggs, B. G., 1979: Chromosome number in two primitive dicots,Xymalos monospora (Monimiaceae) andPiptocalyx moorei (Trimeniaceae). — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.66, 898–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottsberger, G., 1970: Beiträge zur Biologie von Annonaceen-Blüten. — Österr. Bot. Z.118, 237–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977: Some aspects of beetle pollination in the evolution of flowering plants. — Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl.1, 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Reproductive biology in the primitive relic angiospermDrimys brasiliensis (Winteraceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.135, 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1950: The pollination ofCalycanthus occidentalis. — Amer. J. Bot.37, 294–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heel, W. A. van, 1981: A S.E.M.-investigation on the development of free carpels. — Blumea27, 499–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: The ascidiform early development of free carpels, a S.E.M. investigation. — Blumea28, 231–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Variation in the development of ascidiform carpels, an S.E.M.-investigation. — Blumea29, 443–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, Ch. B., 1962: Some observations on pollination and compatibility inMagnolia. — Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci.72, 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, J. L., Doyle, J. A., 1977: Early Cretaceous fossil evidence for angiosperm evolution. — Bot. Rev. (Lancaster)43, 2–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiepko, P., 1965: Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über das Perianth bei denPolycarpicae. — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.84, 359–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotchkiss, A. T., 1959: Pollen and pollination in theEupomatiaceae. — Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales83, 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, N. F., 1976: Palaeobiology of Angiosperm Origins. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Cretaceous plant taxonomy and angiosperm ancestors: sources of difficulty. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.88, 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1979: Barremian earliest angiosperm pollen. — Palaeontol.22, 513–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jérémie, J., 1980: Notes sur le genreAscarina (Chloranthaceae) en Nouvelle-Calédonie et à Madagascar. — Adansonia, Sér. 2,20, 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus, W., 1979: Zur entwicklungsgeschichtlichen Bedeutung triadischer, angiospermider Pollenapertur- und Strukturanlagen. — Beitr. Paläont. Österr.6, 135–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krassilov, V. A., Shilin, P. V., Vachrameev, V. A., 1983: Cretaceous flowers from Kazakhstan. — Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.40, 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubitzki, K., Kurz, H., 1984: Synchronized dichogamy and dioecy in neotropicalLauraceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.147, 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuprianova, L. A., 1981: Palynological data on the familyChloranthaceae, its relationships and the history of distribution. — Bot. Žurn. (Moscow & Leningrad)66, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leins, P., 1983: Blütenmorphologie. — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.96, 160–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, J. F., 1983a: Interprétation nouvelle des appareils sexuels chez les Chloranthacées (Chloranthales, Magnoliidées). — Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci., Sér. III,296, 747–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983b: The origin of angiosperms: An unrecognized ancestral dicotyledon,Hedyosmum (Chloranthales), with a strobiloid flower is living today. — Taxon32, 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Thomas, A., 1981: Ultrastructural characters of the pollen grains of AfricanAnnonaceae and their significance for the phylogeny of primitive angiosperms. — Pollen & Spores22, 267–342/23, 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorence, D. H., 1980: A systematic and co-evolutionary study of theMonimiaceae in the Malagasy region. — Ph.D. Thesis, St. Louis: Washington University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeuse, A. D. J., 1982: Evolution of theMagnoliophyta: Current and dissident viewpoints. — Ann. Rev. Plant Sci.2, 393–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L. B., 1977: The flowers ofAscarina lucida Hook. f. (Chloranthaceae). — New Zealand J. Bot.15, 491–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J., 1981: Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. — Bot. Rev. (Lancaster)47, 1–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklas, K. J., Tiffney, B. H., Knoll, A. H., 1980: Apparent changes in the diversity of fossil plants. — Evol. Biol.12, 1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr, O., 1984: The pollination ecology ofActaea spicata (Ranunculaceae). — Nord. J. Bot.4, 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retallack, G., Dilcher, D. L., 1981a: Early angiosperm reproduction:Prisca reynoldsii, gen. et sp. nov. from mid-Cretaceous coastal deposits in Kansas, U.S.A. — Palaeontographica179B, 103–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981b: A coastal hypothesis for the dispersal and rise to dominance of flowering plants. — In:Niklas, K. J., (Ed.): Paleobotany, Paleoecology and Evolution2, 27–77. — New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. E., Tucker, S. C., 1979: Floral ontogeny ofIllicium floridanum, with emphasis on stamen and carpel development. — Amer. J. Bot.66, 605–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüdenberg, L., 1963: Documented chromosome numbers of plants. — Madroño17, 116–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, F. B., 1983: A new species ofZygogynum (Winteraceae). — Blumea28, 353–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984: Pollen morphology in theTrimeniaceae. — Grana23, 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöffel, K., 1932: Untersuchungen über den Blütenbau der Ranunculaceen. — Planta17, 315–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. C., 1976: Studies of Pacific Island plants, XXXIII. The genusAscarina (Chloranthaceae) in the Southern Pacific. — J. Arnold Arbor.57, 405–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1981: Flora Vitiensis Nova,2. — Lawai, Kauai, Hawaii: Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., 1984: Mosaic evolution, mosaic selection and angiosperm phylogeny. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc.88, 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, A. B., 1927: The flower behavior of avocados. — Mem. New York Bot. Gard.7, 145–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, B. G. L., 1953a: The morphology and relationships of theChloranthaceae. — J. Arnold Arbor.34, 375–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1953b: A taxonomic revision of the genusAscarina Forst. — Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India19, 371–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. L., Meyer, N. R., 1976: Some additional data on the morphology of pollen grains ofDegeneria vitiensis (Degeneriaceae). — Bot. Žurn. (Moscow & Leningrad)61, 1531–1535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thien, L. B., 1974: Floral biology ofMagnolia. — Amer. J. Bot.61, 1037–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1980: Patterns of pollination in the primitive angiosperms. — Biotropica12, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1982: Fly pollination inDrimys (Winteraceae), a primitive angiosperm. — In:Gressitt, J. L., (Ed.): Biogeography and Ecology of New Guinea, 529–533. — The Hague: Junk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thien, L. B., White, D. A., Yatus, L. Y., 1983: The reproductive biology of a relict—Illicium floridanum Ellis. — Amer. J. Bot.70, 719–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, S. C., 1984: Origin of symmetry in flowers. — In:White, R. A., Dickison, W. C., (Eds.): Contemporary Problems in Plant Anatomy, 351–395. — Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch, G. R., 1983:Ficophyllum leaves from the Lower Cretaceous Potomac Group: Evidence for possible affinities withMagnoliales andAustrobaileyaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.70 (5, 2), 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Leaves with chloranthoid characters from the Lower Cretaceous Potomac Group. — Amer. J. Bot.70 (5, 2), 81–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachrameev, V. A., Krassilov, V. A., 1979: Reproductive organs of flowering plants from the Albian of Kazakhstan. — Paleont. J.1979 (1), 112–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vink, W., 1970: TheWinteraceae of the old world I.Pseudowintera andDrimys — morphology and taxonomy. — Blumea18, 225–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977: TheWinteraceae of the old world II.Zygogynum—morphology and taxonomy. — Blumea23, 219–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. W., 1976: Comparative pollen morphology and phylogeny of the ranalean complex. — In:Beck, C. B., (Ed.): Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms, 241–299. — New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1975: Primitively columellaless pollen: a new concept in the evolutionary morphology of angiosperms. — Science187, 445–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • -Walker, A. G., 1982: Ultrastructural study of Lower Cretaceous angiosperm pollen and its evolutionary implications. — Bot. Soc. Amer., Abstr., 66–67.

  • —, 1985: Ultrastructure of Lower Cretaceous angiosperm pollen and the origin and early evolution of flowering plants. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.71, 464–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1983: Winteraceous pollen in the Lower Cretaceous of Israel: early evidence of a magnolialean angiosperm family. — Science220, 1273–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, A. C., 1981: Algunos aspectos da biología floral deAnnona sericea Dun. (Annonaceae). — Acta Amaz.11, 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodland, P. S., Garlick, P. R., 1982: The fine structure of the pollen ofEupomatiaceae. — Austral. J. Bot.30, 297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavada, M. S., 1983: Comparative morphology of monocot pollen and evolutionary trends of apertures and wall structures. — Bot. Rev. (Lancaster)49, 331–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984a: Pollen wall development ofAustrobaileya maculata. — Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)145, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1984b: The relation between pollen exine sculpturing and self-incompatibility mechanisms. — Pl. Syst. Evol.147, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Systematische Botanik der Universität, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008, Zürich, Switzerland

    Peter K. Endress

Authors
  1. Peter K. Endress
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Endress, P.K. Reproductive structures and phylogenetic significance of extant primitive Angiosperms. Pl Syst Evol 152, 1–28 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985348

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985348

Key words

Search

Navigation