Skip to main content
Log in

Systematic implications of chloroplast DNA variation inLepidium sectionsCardamon, Lepiocardamon andLepia (Brassicaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation was examined amongLepidium taxa usually classified in sects.Lepia, Lepiocardamon andCardamon. By using 15 restriction endonucleases, filter hybridization experiments, and comparative mapping procedures, a total of 119 variable restriction sites was detected. Of these, 56 were phylogenetically informative and were used in a cladistic analysis. The resulting phylogenetic tree agrees with results derived from morphology, isozyme electrophoresis and the analysis of glucosinolates. The data suggest: 1) The recognition of sect.Lepia, and 2) that sect.Lepiocardamon has close relationships to sect.Cardamon and that both should be amalgamated. Low rates of interspecific chloroplast DNA sequence divergence in sect.Lepia correlated well with morphological data and isoelectric focusing analysis of Rubisco, suggesting that taxa of sect.Lepia are closely related and most likely have diversified recently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akeroyd, J. R., Rich, T. C. C., 1993:Lepidium. — InTutin, T. G. & al., (Eds): Flora Europaea1, 2nd edn, pp. 398–402. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, V. A., Mishler, B. D., Chase, M. W., 1992: Character state weighting for restriction site data in phylogenetic reconstruction, with examples from chloroplast DNA. — InSoltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds): Molecular systematics of plants, pp. 369–401. — New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I. A., 1986: The genera ofLepidieae (Cruciferae; Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. — J. Arnold Arbor.67: 265–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1987: Distribution and chemotaxonomic significance of glucosinolates in certain Middle-EasternCruciferae. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.15: 559–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissier, E., 1867:Lepidium. — InBoissier, E., (Ed.): Flora Orientalis1, pp. 353–362. — Genève: H. Georg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, N. A., 1939:Lepidium. — InKomarov, V. L., Bush, N. A., (Eds): Flora of the U.S.S.R.8, pp. 374–391. — Moskva: Izd. Akad. Nauk. SSSR. English translation, Jerusalem 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. A., 1976: Isothyocyanates, nitriles and thiocyanates as products of autolysis of glucosinolates inCruciferae. — Phytochemistry15: 759–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, D. J., Palmer, J. D., Kobayashi, M., 1990: Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and the phylogeny ofCoreopsis sect.Coreopsis (Asteraceae). — Amer. J. Bot.77: 557–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley, J. F., Renfroe, W., Blanton, A., 1987: Restriction site variation in theZea chloroplast genome. — Genetics117: 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. L., 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull.19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S., 1988: HENNIG 86. Version 1.5. Computer software and manual. — Port Jefferson station, N. Y. (publ. by author).

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greuter, W., Burdet, H. M., Long, G., (Eds), 1986: Med-Checklist. A critical inventory of vascular plants of the circum-mediterranean countries,3. — Geneve: Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques and Med-Checklist Trust of OPTIMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. A., Ingram, R., 1991: Chloroplast DNA and biosystematics: the effects of intraspecific diversity and plastic transmission. — Taxon40: 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, H. J., 1982: The genusLepidium L. (Brassicaceae) in Australia. — Brunonia4: 217–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, D. M., Bull, J. J., 1993: An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. — Syst. Biol.42: 182–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, J. D., Thomson, T., 1861: Praecursores ad Floram Indicam:Cruciferae. — J. Proc. Linn. Soc.5: 128–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurka, H., Freundner, S., Brown, A. H. D., Plantholt, U., 1989: Aspartate aminotransferase isozymes in the genusCapsella (Brassicaceae): subcellular location, gene duplication, and polymorphism. — Biochem. Genetics27: 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell, B., 1975:Lepidium L. (Cruciferae) in tropical Africa. — Bot. Not.128: 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, S. R., Doebley, J., 1994: Restriction site variation in the chloroplast genome ofTripsacum (Poaceae): phylogeny and rates of sequence evolution. — Syst. Bot.19: 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latowski, K., 1982: Taksonomiczne studium karpologiczne eurazjatyckich gatunkow rodzajuLepidium L. — Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, W., 1970:Lepidium. — InCodd, L. E., De Winter, B., Killick, D. J. B., Rycroft, H. B., (Eds): Flora of southern Africa13, pp. 83–94. — Pretoria: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, G. A., Frankton, C., 1962: Taxonomy of the genusCardaria with particular reference to the species introduced into North America. — Canad. J. Bot.40: 1411–1425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummenhoff, K., Hurka, H., 1991: Isoelectric focusing analysis of Rubisco inLepidium (Brassicaceae), sectionsLepia, Lepiocardamon andCardamon. — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.19: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1992: Systematics of AustralianLepidium species (Brassicaceae) and implications for their origin: evidence from IEF analysis of Rubisco. — Pl. Syst. Evol.183: 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1994: Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and phylogenetic relationships in the genusThlaspi sensu lato (Brassicaceae). — Syst. Bot.19: 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., Li, W., 1979: Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA76: 5268–5273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J. D., 1987: Chloroplast DNA evolution and biosystematic uses of chloroplast DNA variation. — Amer. Naturalist130: 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1988: Chloroplast DNA variation and plant phylogeny. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.75: 1180–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, G., Doebley, J. F., 1993: Chloroplast DNA variation in the genusSecale (Poaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.187: 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prantl, K., 1891:Cruciferae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien3 (2), pp. 145–206. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg, L. H., Beckstrom-Sternberg, S. M., Liston, A., Arias, D. M., 1991: Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from chloroplast DNA and isozyme variation inHelianthus sect.Helianthus (Asteraceae). — Syst. Bot.16: 50–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1991: Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. — Evol. Trends Pl.5: 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R. C., 1940: On two weedy Crucifers. — Rhodora42: 302–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandbrink, J. V., van Brederode, J., 1991: Different approaches to analysis of restriction fragment patterns of chloroplast DNA and phylogenetic relationships inSilene sect.Siphonomorpha (Caryophyllaceae). — Biochem. Syst. Ecol.19: 559–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze-Motel, W., (Ed.), 1986:Lepidium. Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa4 (1), 3rd edn, pp. 401–417, 590–591. — Berlin: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, O. E., 1936:Cruciferae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien17b, pp. 227–658. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solms-Laubach, H., 1906: Cruciferenstudien. IV. Die Varianten der Embryolage. — Bot. Zeitung64: 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Doyle, J. J., (Eds), 1992: Molecular systematics of plants. — New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1991: PAUP. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1 for Macintosh. Computer package. — Champaign, Ill.: Illinois Nat. Hist. Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sytsma, K. J., Gottlieb, L. D., Berry, P. E., 1991: The use of chloroplast DNA to assess biogeography and evolution of morphology, breeding systems, and flavonoids inFuchsia sect.Skinnera (Onagraceae). — Syst. Bot.16: 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thellung, A., 1906: Die GattungLepidium (L.)R. Br. Eine monographische Studie. — Neue Denkschr. Allg. Schweizer Naturforsch. Ges.41: 1–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. L., Kim, K.-J., 1990: An overview of the genusPyrrhopappus (Asteraceae) with emphasis upon chloroplast DNA restriction site data. — Amer. J. Bot.77: 845–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, S. I., Black, L. D., 1991: Molecular systematics ofBrassica and allied genera (subtribeBrassicinae, Brassiceae) — chloroplast genome and cytodeme congruence. — Theor. Appl. Genet.82: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watrous, L., Wheeler, Q., 1981: The outgroup comparison method of character analysis. — Syst. Zool.30: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, M., 1966:Lepidium. — In: Flora Palaestina1, pp. 299–302. — Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zunk, K., Mummenhoff, K., Hurka, H., 1993: Chloroplast restriction site variation in theBrassicaceae tribeLepidieae. — Pl. Mol. Evol. Newsl.3: 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mummenhoff, K., Kuhnt, E., Koch, M. et al. Systematic implications of chloroplast DNA variation inLepidium sectionsCardamon, Lepiocardamon andLepia (Brassicaceae). Pl Syst Evol 196, 75–88 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985336

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985336

Key words

Navigation