Abstract
Centaurea melitensis is a cleistogamous species of Mediterranean distribution, which normally produces a wide range of capitula varying in terms of morphology, size, position in the shoot system and other aspects. For that reason, and particularly in view of the pseudanthic nature of the flower head in Asteraceae, a preliminary study to characterise cleistogamy in this species was considered of interest. Capitular heteromorphism observed inC. melitensis was confirmed by principal component analysis (PCA). The five capitulum types differentiated [initial cleistogamous (iCL), intermediate cleistogamous (xCL), final cleistogamous (fCL), pseudocleistogamous (PCL) and chasmogamous (CH)] fit development patterns specific for both placement on the plant and timing. The balance between cleistogamy and chasmogamy is correlated with the final height of the plant. All these features are consistent with those reported for other cleistogamous species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burtt B. L. (1977) Aspects of diversification in the capitulum. In: Heywood V. H., Harborne J. B., Turner B. L. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. Academic Press, London, pp. 41–59.
Campbell C. S., Quinn J. A., Cheplick G. P., Bell T. J. (1983) Cleistogamy in grasses. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 411–441.
Carroll M. A. (1919) The development of the chasmogamous and the cleistogamous flowers ofImpatiens fulva. Cont. Bot. Lab. Morris. Arb. University of Pennsylvania 4: 144–183.
Clay K. (1982) Environmental and genetic determinants of cleistogamy in a natural population of the grassDanthonia spicata. Evolution 36: 734–741.
Cronquist A. (1981) An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
Darwin C. (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Appleton, New York.
Dillé J. E., Knowles P. F. (1975) Histology and inheritance of the closed flower inCarthamus tinctorius (Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 62: 209–215.
Ellstrand N. C., Lord E. M., Eckard K. J. (1984) The inflorescence as a metapopulation of flowers: position-dependent differences in function and form in the cleistogamous speciesCollomia grandiflora Dougl. ex Lindl. (Polemoniaceae). Bot. Gaz. 145: 329–333.
Gallardo R., Domínguez E., Muñoz J. M. (1993) The heterochronic origin of the cleistogamous flower inAstragalus cymbicarpos (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 814–823.
Harlan J. R. (1945) Cleistogamy and chasmogamy inBromus carinatus Hook. and Arn. Am. J. Bot. 32: 66–72.
Johansen D. A. (1940) Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Koller D., Roth N. (1964) Studies on the ecological and physiological significance of amphicarpy inGymnarrhena micrantha (Compositae). Am. J. Bot. 51: 26–35.
Le Corff J. (1993) Effects of light and nutrient availability on chasmogamy and cleistogamy in an understory tropical herb,Calathea micans (Marantaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 1392–1399.
Lee C. W., Erickson H. T., Janick J. (1976) Inheritance of cleistogamy inSalpiglossis sinuata. J. Hered. 67: 267–270.
Leppik E. E. (1977) The evolution of capitulum types of the Compositae in the light of insect-flower interaction. In: Heywood V. H., Harborne J. B., Turner B. L. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Compositae. Academic Press, London, pp. 61–89.
Lloyd D. G. (1984) Variation strategies of plants in heterogeneous environments. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 21: 357–385.
Lord E. M. (1979) The development of cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers inLamium amplexicaule L. (Labiatae): an example of heteroblastic inflorescence development. Bot. Gaz. 140: 39–50.
Lord E. M. (1980) An anatomical basis for the divergent floral forms in the cleistogamous speciesLamium amplexicaule L. (Labiateae). Am. J. Bot. 67: 1430–1441.
Lord E. M. (1981) Cleistogamy: a tool for the study of floral morphogenesis, function and evolution. Bot. Rev. 47: 421–449.
Madge M. A. P. (1929) Spermatogenesis and fertilization in the cleistogamous flower ofViola odorata var.praecox Gregory. Ann. Bot. 43: 545–577.
Mayers A. M., Lord E. M. (1983) Comparative flower development in the cleistogamous speciesViola odorata. I. A growth rate studio. Am. J. Bot. 70: 1548–1555.
Minter T. C., Lord E. M. (1983) A comparison of cleistogamous and chasmogamous floral development inCollomia grandiflora Dougl. ex Lindl. (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 70: 1499–1508.
Moore D. M. (1978) Asterales, Compositae. In: Heywood V. H. (ed.) Flowering plants of the world. Oxford Univ. Press, London, pp. 263–268.
Porras R. (1998) Biología reproductiva y evolutiva enCentaurea melitensis L. (Asteraceae). Doctoral Thesis. Universidad de Córdoba, Spain.
Porras R., Muñoz J. M. (1999) Breeding system in the cleistogamous speciesCentaurea melitensis L. (Asteraceae). Can. J. Bot. 77: 1632–1640.
Proctor M., Yeo P. (1973) The pollination of flowers. Collins, London.
Redbo-Torstensson P., Berg H. (1995) Seasonal cleistogamy: a conditional strategy to provide reproductive assurance. Acta Bot. Neerl. 44: 247–256.
Ritzerow H. (1908) Über Bau und Befruchtung kleistogamer Blüten. Flora 98: 163–212.
Rongeot H., Nitsch C., Reynoird J. P. (1989)Gerbera kunzeana: une espèce cléistogame. Bull. Soc. Bot. France. Lett. Bot. 136: 71–77.
Ruiz de Clavijo E., Jiménez M. J. (1993) Cleistogamy and chasmogamy inCeratocapnos heterocarpa (Fumariaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 154: 325–333.
SAS Institute (1988) SAS Procedures Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, North Carolina.
Schemske D. W. (1978) Evolution of reproductive characteristics inImpatiens (Balsaminaceae): the significance of cleistogamy and chasmogamy. Ecology 59: 596–613.
Schoen D. J., Lloyd D.G. (1984) The selection of cleistogamy and heteromorphic diaspores. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 23: 303–322.
Talavera S. (1987) Centaurea. In: Valdés B., Talavera S., Fernández-Galiano E. (eds.) Flora vascular de Andalucía Occidental, vol. 3. Ketres editora, Barcelona, pp. 146–160.
Uphof J. C. T. (1938) Cleistogamic flowers. Bot. Rev. 4: 21–49.
Van der Pjil L. (1972) Principles of dispersal in higher plants. Springer, New York.
Waller D. M. (1980) Environmental determinants of outcrossing inImpatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Evolution 34: 747–761.
Wilken D. H. (1982) The balance between chasmogamy and cleistogamy inCollomia grandiflora (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 69: 1326–1333.
Zeide B. (1978) Reproductive behaviour of plants in time. Am. Nat. 112: 636–639.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porras, R., Muñoz, J.M. Cleistogamy inCentaurea melitensis (Asteraceae): Capitulum variability and spatio-temporal development patterns. Pl Syst Evol 223, 251–262 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985283
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985283