Skip to main content
Log in

Heterostyly in the Lamiaceae: The case ofSalvia brandegeei

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterostyly rarely occurs in families with strongly zygomorphic flowers. For this reason Darwin (1877) doubted whether heterostyly would occur in the Lamiaceae and recent reviews have not reported the floral polymorphism in this family. Here we describe distyly in a rare species ofSalvia restricted to bluffs and seaward canyons on Santa Rosa Island (Santa Barbara Co., California) and northwestern Baja California (Mexico).Salvia brandegeei is morphologically distylous with populations composed of equal frequencies of long-and short-styled morphs differing reciprocally in stigma and anther position. Controlled hand pollinations demonstrated no significant differences in the seed set of self, intramorph or intermorph pollinations. Unlike most heterostylous species investigated,S. brandegeei does not possess diallelic incompatibility or ancillary polymorphisms of pollen and stigmas. We propose that the evolution of distyly inS. brandegeei may have been associated with an ecological shift to a new environment in which protandry failed to prevent increased levels of geitonogamy. Heterostyly was then selected because it increased the proficiency of cross-pollination. The origin of distyly in self-compatibleS. brandegeei is consistent with Lloyd and Webb's theoretical model for the evolution of distyly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson W. R. (1973) A morphological hypothesis for the origin of heterostyly in the Rubiaceae. Taxon 22: 537–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker A. M., Thompson J. D., Barrett S. C. H. (2000) Evolution and maintenance of stigmaheight dimorphism in Narcissus: I. Floral variation and style-morph ratios. Heredity (in press).

  • Barrett S. C. H. (ed.) (1992a) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S. C. H. (1992b) Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: model systems for evolutionary analysis. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S. C. H., Cruzan M. B. (1994) Incompatibility in heterostylous plants. In: Williams E. G., Clarke A. G., Knox R. B. (eds.) Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 189–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S. C. H., Richards J. H. (1990) Heterostyly in tropical plants. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 55: 35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S. C. H., Cole W. W., Arroyo J., Cruzan M. B., Lloyd D. G. (1997) Sexual polymorphisms inNarcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): Is this species tristylous? Heredity 78: 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B. (1979) A model for the evolution of distyly. Amer. Natur. 114: 467–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane S. A., Day A. G. (1994) A heterostylousGilia (Polemoniaceae) from central Nevada. Madroño 41: 120–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C. (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulberger R. (1992) Floral polymorphisms and their functional significance in the heterostylous syndrome. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin, pp. 41–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epling C. C. (1938) The Californian Salvias: A review ofSalvia sectionAudibertia. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 25: 95–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epling C. C. (1940) Supplementary notes onSalvia:Audibertia. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 27: 259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganders F.R. (1978) The genetics and evolution of gynodioecy inNemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae). Can. J. Bot. 56: 1400–1408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganders F. R. (1979) The biology of heterostyly. New Zeal. J. Bot. 17: 607–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt P., Bernhardt P. (1990) Pollination biology ofNivenia (Iridaceae) and the presence of heterostylous self-compatibility. Israel J. Bot. 39: 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque Md. S., Ghoshal K. K. (1981) Floral biology and breeding system in the genusSalvia L. Proc. Indian Natn. Sci. Acad. B47: 716–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder L. D., Barrett S. C. H. (1996) Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In: Lloyd D. G., Barrett S. C. H. (eds.) Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 140–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder L. D., Barrett S. C. H., Cole W. W. (2000) The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267: 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck R. B. (1992) Overview of pollination biology in the Lamiaceae. In: Harley R. M., Reynolds T. (eds.) Advances in Labiate science. The Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, UK, pp. 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppik E. E. (1972) Origin and evolution of bilateral symmetry in flowers. Evolutionary Biology 5: 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G., Webb C. J. (1986) The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zeal. J. Bot. 24: 135–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G., Webb C. J. (1992a) The evolution of heterostyly. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin, pp. 151–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd D. G., Webb C. J. (1992b). The selection of heterostyly. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin, pp. 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley D. J. (1987) The plant book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro L. (1997) Is the dichogamy ofSalvia verbenacea (Lamiaceae) an effective barrier to self-fertilization? Plant Syst. Evol. 207: 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisess K. R. (1984) Heterostyly inSalvia brandegeei (Lamiaceae). Madroño 31: 253–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R. (1971) The reproductive system ofJepsonia heterandra. Evolution 25: 300–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R. (1979a) Heterostyly inOplonia (Acanthaceae). J. Arnold Arboretum 60: 382–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R. (1979b) The genetics of heterostyly inHypericum aegypticum. Heredity 42: 271–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens S. J., Ubera-Jiménez J. L. (1992) Breeding systems in Labiatae. In: Harley R. M., Reynolds T. (eds.) Advances in Labiate science. The Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, UK, pp. 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor M., Yeo P., Lack A. (1996) The natural history of pollination. Timber Press, Portland, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards A. J. (1997) Plant breeding systems. Second edn. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards J. H., Koptur S. (1993) Floral variation and distyly inGuettarda scabra (Rubiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 80: 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1994) JMP Users' Guide Version 3.0.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Treuren R., Bijlsma R., Ouborg N. J., Van Delden W. (1993) The effect of population size and plant density on outcrossing rate in locally endangeredSalvia pratensis. Evolution 47: 1094–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier B. S. (1967) The origin and evolutionary development of heterostyly in the angiosperms. Evolution 21: 210–226.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, S.C.H., Wilken, D.H. & Cole, W.W. Heterostyly in the Lamiaceae: The case ofSalvia brandegeei . Pl Syst Evol 223, 211–219 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985280

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985280

Key words

Navigation